List of Articles Credits

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Application of Allameh Tabatabai and Allameh Mesbah Yazdi's views on the origin of obligation and moral value
  seyed morteza hoseini motlagh Mehdi  Imani Moghaddam
  The general philosophers of Muslim ethics, in accordance with the application and permanence of Islamic law and the eternal authority of the tradition of the Infallibles (pbuh) and also in accordance with rational reasoning and stability of human nature and despite the More

  The general philosophers of Muslim ethics, in accordance with the application and permanence of Islamic law and the eternal authority of the tradition of the Infallibles (pbuh) and also in accordance with rational reasoning and stability of human nature and despite the difference in the method of explanation, consider the criteria for values and They have become moral norms. Two great philosophers of Shiite ethics in the contemporary period, namely Allameh Tabatabai and Allameh Mesbah Yazdi, have theorized in their seemingly different explanation of moral realism and the application of moral criteria; The present article seeks to prove that these two explanations can be referred to a single explanation.Allameh Tabatabai (in the common interpretation of his theory) considers moral necessity as a matter of credit and considers the real and developmental necessity between the action of the active force and its objective effect, figuratively (meaning unity in meaning and difference in instance) to the resulting mental and sensual necessity. It has spread from the idea of a mental end, but Allameh Mesbah has reached the necessity of moral requirements due to the necessity of comparison to others. By considering the necessity of comparative necessity and referring it to the necessity of others, these two theories can be considered as different interpretations of a truth. The present research has explained this important point. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Quran-based systematization; What, why and how
  Hussein  Babaee Mojarad Mohammad AbdolHusseinZadeh
  Systemization in common language and sometimes in scientific discourse have spiritual common meaning for four proof of “system logy” (in genesis field), “finding system” (in legislation field), “making system” (in credits field) and “stablishing system” (in objective fi More

  Systemization in common language and sometimes in scientific discourse have spiritual common meaning for four proof of “system logy” (in genesis field), “finding system” (in legislation field), “making system” (in credits field) and “stablishing system” (in objective field). Although, in particular, “making system” is observing credits and social contracts which, is establish in any sub-system. Hence, the author believed that “making system” with its general meaning is contain all four fields and Holy Qur’an, as a religious epistemology source, is in all four field. According to this, each field is acquired to that field. Furthermore, if the process of “making system” became ignored or did not based on Qur’an principles then the process of solving problems and system’s challenges won’t base on monotheistic realism and idealism. Therefore, different social sub-systems would become panacea for delusive or non-priority issues, imposition and oriented toward non-Islamic ideals. This deviation from religious trusted sources, on one hand, would failed Islamic system in establishing its material and spiritual purposes, which, this would have doubted elites and people of the system through revolutionary identity of Islamic system. And on other hand, this would lead to establishment of social sub-system, autocracy (though small), arrogance (though in a small part) and establishment of secular governance (though smoothly but theorized). The process of “making system” is making credit in form of moving from origin to matters (having brief knowledge through recognizing the basis and giving priority to matters), and moving from matters toward sources (for re-reading) and reforming (re-defining), origins (having lasting knowledge through origins) and finally moving from origins to matters for defining, explaining, sensing and solving problems. Although, must bear in mind that in this movement, which, is detailed and brevity, having inner flexibility for reformation, moving gradually toward evolution is continuation for making system. Manuscript profile