A comparative analysis of the education systems in Iran and the United States and their respective statutory legal frameworks
Subject Areas : Civil LawHadi Abangah 1 , Hamideh Farivar vishkayi 2 , Zeynab Keshavarz shirkodehi 3 , Kosar Ghobadi azbari 4 , Fatemeh Gholami 5
1 - Assistant Professor, Theology Department, Bent-e-Hoda Sadr Farhangian Campus, Gilan, Iran.
2 - Bachelor's degree student in Elementary Education, Bent Al-Hoda Sadr Campus Branch, Farhangian University, Rasht, Iran
3 - Bachelor's degree student in Elementary Education, Bent Al-Hoda Sadr Campus Branch, Farhangian University, Rasht, Iran
4 - Bachelor's degree student in Elementary Education, Bent Al-Hoda Sadr Campus Branch, Farhangian University, Rasht, Iran
5 - Bachelor's degree student in Elementary Education, Bent Al-Hoda Sadr Campus Branch, Farhangian University, Rasht, Iran
Keywords: Education System, The Iranian Education System, Education in the United States of America, Education Structure,
Abstract :
The educational systems of Iran and the United States, despite their structural and cultural differences, both aim to develop capable and competent citizens. However, each faces challenges related to educational equity and quality.The Iranian education system is largely centralized, operating based on unified curricula and nationwide standardized assessments. This approach has made issues such as educational inequality and limited resources more apparent. In contrast, the U.S. education system is decentralized, with each state having the autonomy to determine its own curriculum and standards. This structure, due to reliance on local taxes, has led to significant disparities in educational quality.Assessment methods also differ considerably between the two systems. In Iran, Konkur serve as the primary means of evaluation, placing substantial pressure on students. In contrast, the U.S. system places greater emphasis on skill development and employs a wider variety of assessment methods, which can enhance educational dynamism.Ultimately, despite these differences, both systems share the common goal of preparing future generations and meeting the educational needs of society. Both also face similar challenges regarding educational equity and must strive to reduce inequalities and improve the overall quality of education.
1. Aghazadeh, A., & Armand, M. (2025). History of education in Iran. SAMT. [In Persian]
2. Armand, M. (2014). Education and curriculum in the United States. [In Persian]
3. Babalouyan, R., Binaei, H., Pouresmaeil, H., Abbaszadeh-Moghadam, N., & Hosseinzadeh, Y. (2016). The education system in Iran. University Research Publications. [In Persian]
4. Connolly-Sporing, A., Cody, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2024). Gifted students learning in homeschool settings: Research and policy recommendations. Journal of School Choice, 18(4), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2024.2422246
5. Eguz, S. (2023). Contemporary education systems: The case of United States. In The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (Vol. 33, pp. 126–134). ISRES Publishing.
6. Lin, A. (2025). Comparative analysis of public and private secondary school education systems in the United States. Journal of Education and Educational Policy Studies, 3(2), 23519. https://doi.org/10.54254/3049-7248/2025.23519
7. National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Report. U.S. Department of Education.
8. National Education Association. (n.d.). Report.
9. National Institute for Early Education Research. (n.d.). Report on universal pre-K programs. https://nieer.org
10. New York State Education Department. (n.d.). A parent’s guide to the New York State Next Generation Learning Standards.
11. Religion in the public schools. (n.d.).
12. Spring, J. (2021). American education (18th ed.). Routledge.
13. Spring, J. (2021). American education (20th ed.). Routledge.
14. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Report.
