Analytical Study Of The Differences Between The 1956 And 1976 Rent Laws And Their Advantages And Disadvantages
Subject Areas : Civil Law
Fateme Farad_e_falsafi
1
(Master of Private Law, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Humanities, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.)
Keywords: Rent Law, Right to Occupation, Profession, or Trade, Advantages, Disadvantages, Iran,
Abstract :
The right to goodwill and the right to acquire or trade are among the most important issues related to rent, which have a very important place in legal and economic issues. The change and evolution of this legal institution and the legislation in relation to them have always caused sensitivity and controversy. Finally, I will briefly present what we conclude in this thesis as follows: What is clear is that the majority of jurists agree on this matter that the right to acquire or trade is a financial right that is different from goodwill that is realized for the tenant of the place of business or trade and its collection by the tenant depends on the mention of it. It is not in the contract. But its realization depends on the material and immaterial elements of the merchant's or professional's capital, or in other words, one of the components of the business. This right is based on a series of material and spiritual principles and criteria that merchants or artisans use in order to meet the needs of their customers. In this research, we intend to examine the differences between the goodwill of the 1956 law and the 1976 law and its advantages and disadvantages in the form of a library.
1. Bahrami, Z. (2007). The Right to Rent, Occupation, Profession, or Trade, Negah-e-Binah Publications. [In Persian]
2. Panjtan, S. (2010). Relations between Landlord and Tenant, Kanun Journal, No. 112. [In Persian]
3. Jafari Langroudi, M. (2001). Terminology of Law, Ganj-e-Danesh Library. [In Persian]
4. Helli, S.(2000). Research on Jurisprudence Issues, Al-Manar Institute. [In Persian]
5. Darkhshani, A. (1978). Legal Institutions, Kanun-e-Vakil Law Journal, No. 142. [In Persian]
6. Danir, M. (2003). Research Journals of Knowledge Seekers, No.
7. Rouhani, S.(1995). Modern Issues, Dar al-Quran Karim Publications. [In Persian]
8. Zinali, M.(2011). Practical Methods of Presenting and Defending Rent and Occupation Claims, Jangal Publications. [In Persian]
9. Sayfi Golpayegani, L.(2006).Tawdih al-Masa'il, Dar al-Quran Karim Publications. [In Persian]
10. Abdipour-Fard, E. (2005). Analytical Approach to the Nature of Occupation or Profession Right, Fiqh and Law Journal, No. 6. [In Persian]
11. Fazl-e-Lankarani, M.(2000). Jame' al-Masael, Mehr Publications. [In Persian]
12. Katibi, H.(1956).Rent Law or Commercial Ownership, Kanun-e-Vakil Law Journal, No. 51[In Persian]
13. Katozian, N. (1977). Analytical Critique of Landlord and Tenant Law, Law Journal (Kanun), Autumn. [In Persian]
14. Kashavarz, B.(2003).Rent Law and the Right to Occupation, Profession, or Trade in Iranian Law and Islamic Jurisprudence, Kashavarz Publications. [In Persian]
15. Katozian, N.(1977). Civil Law - Specific Contracts, University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
16. Kashavarz, B. (2003). Rent Law and the Right to Occupation, Profession, or Trade in Iranian Law and Islamic Jurisprudence, p.25-26. [In Persian]
17. Makarem Shirazi, N.(2010).Tawdih al-Masa'il, Hadaf Publications. [In Persian]
18. Nori Hamedani, S.(2001).Rent Law, Research and Field Journal, No. 8. [In Persian]
19. Nori Hamedani, S. (2001). Rent Law, Research and Field Journal, No. 8. [In Persian]
20. Novin, (1997).Overview of the Landlord and Tenant Law of 1997, Kanun Journal, No. 15. [In Persian]
21. Yavari Ahari, B. (1962).Right to Occupation, Profession, or Trade, Kanun-e-Vakil Law Journal, No. 79. [In Persian]
22. Yavari, F. (1978).Judicial Developments in the Resolution of Landlord and Tenant Disputes, Law Journal (Hoqouq), No. 143. [In Persian]
