List of Articles Wrong

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - OmoureHasbieh in beliet geometiy of shia jurisprudence
  Javad   Panjehpour siyamak baharloei
  The subject of public welfare and public works are important issues among Muslim philosophers such as Shi'a and Sunni. On the one hand, this issue, similar to some other issues in governmental jurisprudence, has partly been influenced by verbal differences between Sunni More

  The subject of public welfare and public works are important issues among Muslim philosophers such as Shi'a and Sunni. On the one hand, this issue, similar to some other issues in governmental jurisprudence, has partly been influenced by verbal differences between Sunnis and Shi'as. Accordingly, the Sunni people had paid more attention to the public aspect of public affairs due to the acceptance of caliphate sovereignty, but Shiite jurisprudents had often considered most non-governmental aspects of public affairs. The proper unity and appropriate consensus between the jurists (in their foundations and approaches to the public welfare and public works) in the expansion and limitation of the extent of the implementation of these divine commandments are not observed (although there is a consensus in the sense of affairs). This discrepancy indicates that each of them has different foundations and approaches compared to public welfare. According to the above descriptions, there are two theories and views on the excerpts of the public works. The first view is that the domain of this institution is limited to the guardianship of the estate of the orphans, insane people, and bankrupt orphans. The second view does not limit the scope of public works to specific issues and has a wider perspective than the first view, which also includes social, economic, political, and cultural issues. Even though the public works are one of the vague issues in legal affairs, legislators have not considered a comprehensive definition of it and have not provided an effective criterion for identifying it. Therefore, the main objective of this research is the comparative study of public works for the jurisprudence of Shia and Sunni jurisprudence' views by the codified statue. Also, the findings of this research show that the scope of public works in the Sunni jurisprudence is limited to the issue of Enjoining good and forbidding wrong, but for the Shiite jurisprudents, it covers everything that leads to the disorder in a social system and the fault in society. Thus, the concept of public works is beyond enjoining good and forbidding wrong. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Social Trust in Islam’s Social System
  hassan khairi
  Social trust is an issue that is interested to sociologists and social reformers. Despite penetrating traditional culture with deep trustworthy elements, our society is faced with this phenomenon. Without any doubt, modern society committed to religious traditions has m More

  Social trust is an issue that is interested to sociologists and social reformers. Despite penetrating traditional culture with deep trustworthy elements, our society is faced with this phenomenon. Without any doubt, modern society committed to religious traditions has moral, intellectual, arithmetical, and obligatory elements. In this study, with an integrated approach of agent-structure and acknowledging the necessity of these three elements has provided a picture of Islam’s trustworthy teachings. In addition, this study shed light on some issues extracted from individual jurisprudence’s dominance over social jurisprudence, and lack of clear distinction between action domain and structural domain. And finally, the study investigated the religious duty of commending to good deeds and prohibiting from wrong deeds. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Manager Deserving Ujrat ul Misl in Managing Other’s Property in View of Quran and Iranian Law
  Hamideh  Dadashpour Seyed Mohammad  Assadinejad
  Ujrat ul Misl (compensation for one’s work) of the tenant or manager in managing other’s property is among issues about which the law has remained silent just as it has been silent about other related issues such as civil liability, characteristics of manager, condition More

  Ujrat ul Misl (compensation for one’s work) of the tenant or manager in managing other’s property is among issues about which the law has remained silent just as it has been silent about other related issues such as civil liability, characteristics of manager, conditions for managing the property and conditions of the property being managed, etc. This paper, using the descriptive-analytical method, seeks to prove that, based on verses of the Quran, manager of other’s property does not deserve to receive Ujrat ul Misl. In view of most jurists and scholars, the main reason for Hisbah is the verses related to Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong. Apart from several verses in which there is the term “Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong”, it seems that other verses, including even verses related to managing other’s property can be considered verses of Hisbah, given the extension of the concept of Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong by some jurists and thinkers who deem Hisbah the same thing as Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong. May be it could be said that based on the principle of respect for action, manager deserves Ujrat ul Misl of his action. However, the main purpose is studying if manager deserves Ujrat ul Misl based on verses of the Quran and God has frequently promised great reward in the Hereafter for His servants and described Himself as the greatest Muhasib (bookkeeper). Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - The wrong impact on criminal crime and criminal law
  sima ghobadvand
  One of the important topics in criminal law and jurisprudence and consequently criminal responsibility is the "wrong" discussion. Mistake or suspicion means, like, like, and synonymous with errors and arises from ignorance and cognitive disabilities and individual knowl More

  One of the important topics in criminal law and jurisprudence and consequently criminal responsibility is the "wrong" discussion. Mistake or suspicion means, like, like, and synonymous with errors and arises from ignorance and cognitive disabilities and individual knowledge and experiences. The mistake is divided into two types of "the subject matter" and the "judgmental mistake". The criminal act is the result and product of the offender's will to achieve the purpose of the offender and obtain the criminal path through the criminal path, but in many cases the offender, although the criminal path to the end. The material and the material element of the criminal act also commits, but for the reason, it does not achieve the purpose it does not have, and one of these is the wrong cause of identity and identity. As the most important crime that has an inherent crime at all times and places, it is the result of taking the life of a person who is one of the most important assets of any individual. For this reason, much of the investigation is centered on this crime and issues that are raised following the commitment of the crime, including the purpose of the purpose of identity in the discussion of murder. The content is library. key words: Wrong, crime, science and ignorance in crime, crime elements, jurisprudence, criminal law Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  5 - The wrong impact on the person or personality in the crime on the soul
  Afshin Rahimi Pardanjani
  The murder of human life and the deprivation of human life is one of the most important crimes against individuals, and in all societies, it is accompanied by severe reaction and consideration of severe punishments for the killers. In the Islamic legal system, the punis More

  The murder of human life and the deprivation of human life is one of the most important crimes against individuals, and in all societies, it is accompanied by severe reaction and consideration of severe punishments for the killers. In the Islamic legal system, the punishment of murder is retribution if it is deliberate and justice, and this punishment is mentioned in the Holy Qur'an as the source of society's life. Physical and crime against spiritual personality is divided. In the meantime, crimes against physical integrity (such as murder, amputation, multiplication, miscarriage) against crimes against spiritual personality (such as insult, defamation, Qaddaf, false publication, etc.) More important. Among the crimes against physical entirety, the crime of murder is, most importantly, because murder is the deprivation of life from living man. In this way, the crime of murder takes him the most valuable divine blessing to man, which is his body and soul. Therefore, in all the legal systems of the world, the crime of murder is of great importance, and especially for its deliberate type, heavy penalties such as imprisonment or life imprisonment are projected in criminal laws in different countries. We can kill the murder by "mistake in the victim" (wrong in the goal) or "mistake in the personality of the victim" (mistake in the identity). Manuscript profile