• List of Articles حضوری

      • Open Access Article

        1 - A Critical Evaluation of Ibn Sina’s Arguments on the Presential Perception of Essence
        somayyeh ajalli sahar kavandi
        According to Islamic philosophers, the soul’s self-perception is of the type of presential knowledge. In other words, the soul’s awareness of its own essence, unlike what Descartes states in his concept of Cogito, does not occur through external objects, body organs, or More
        According to Islamic philosophers, the soul’s self-perception is of the type of presential knowledge. In other words, the soul’s awareness of its own essence, unlike what Descartes states in his concept of Cogito, does not occur through external objects, body organs, or soulish acts. Rather, the soul perceives its self free from its acts and states and with no reliance on the activities of material body. The prominent Islamic philosopher, Ibn Sina, has posed different arguments in order to demonstrate this claim, the most important of which is the argument of “floating man” or “suspended man”. However, an evaluation of such arguments seems to reveal that they are not capable of demonstrating their claim and, under the best circumstances, they can merely prove the difference between the soul’s self-knowledge and its knowledge of other objects. Therefore, it seems that either more solid arguments are necessary to demonstrate the soul’s independence in self-perception or the soul should not be considered independent of the body and, particularly, the brain in this regard. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Possibility and characteristics of transcendent obligatory presence knowledge from Ibn Arabi's point of view
        Souriah  Gheravand Mohammad Kazem Rezazadeh Joudi Nafiseh  Fayaz Bakhsh
        Ibn Arabi, as one of the prominent philosophers in the field of the possibility and characteristics of the knowledge of the necessary, transcendent presence, has raised issues and arguments. This article intends to examine Ibn Arabi's views on the possibility and charac More
        Ibn Arabi, as one of the prominent philosophers in the field of the possibility and characteristics of the knowledge of the necessary, transcendent presence, has raised issues and arguments. This article intends to examine Ibn Arabi's views on the possibility and characteristics of transcendent obligatory presence knowledge with an analytical approach. The study of Ibn Arabi's views in this regard indicates that from Ibn Arabi's point of view, present knowledge is one of the true and certain conditions and knowledge, and the seeker of the knowledge of the Supreme Being must step on the path of present knowledge. Ibn Arabi's presence knowledge and knowledge is based on esoteric observation, so in Ibn Arabi's view, knowledge and knowledge is an inadequate and unreal product. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - A study of combined teaching methods (face-to-face) during the corona period on students
        Mohsen  Pasandeh
        The purpose of this study is to investigate the methods of combined education (face-to-face) during the coronation period for students. We had a face-to-face (traditional) training model and a face-to-face (virtual) training model, and we examined the advantages and dis More
        The purpose of this study is to investigate the methods of combined education (face-to-face) during the coronation period for students. We had a face-to-face (traditional) training model and a face-to-face (virtual) training model, and we examined the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods. Of course, given the current situation in the field of Quid 19 disease, we decided to give an overview of the best teaching method in critical situations where it is not possible to physically attend the teacher and learner, which is ultimately based on several months of practical experience. The latter in schools and universities may be the best possible combination of both face-to-face (traditional) and face-to-face (virtual) teaching methods, so the success of one of the two methods cannot be conclusively proven. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - A Critical Study of the Views of ‘Alī Qulī Khān Qarchoghāi Khān on Acquired and Presential Types of Knowledge
        Hamid Reza  Khademi
        ‘Alī Qulī Khān Qarchoghāi Khān was one of the philosophers of the Safavid era, many of whose works have remained unknown. However, his book Revival of Wisdom, which contains many of his philosophical ideas, has been edited and published. Among the innovative accomplishm More
        ‘Alī Qulī Khān Qarchoghāi Khān was one of the philosophers of the Safavid era, many of whose works have remained unknown. However, his book Revival of Wisdom, which contains many of his philosophical ideas, has been edited and published. Among the innovative accomplishments of this philosopher, reference can be made to his novel classifications and interpretations of acquired and presential types of knowledge. When describing his approach in this regard, while presenting the views of early philosophers regarding the truth of knowledge, prior to explaining the two types of true knowledge – essential knowledge and accidental knowledge – he introduces acquired and presential types of knowledge as subcategories of accidental knowledge. On the one hand, some of his classifications of acquired knowledge and presential knowledge are unprecedented in the history of Islamic philosophy. On the other hand, he maintains that the truth of knowledge is an accidental affair that is added to the rational soul. In fact, through his analysis of the problem of the union of the intellect and intelligible, ‘Alī Qulī Khān views knowledge as a quality that has occurred to the qualified. Here, his approach has been studied at four stages: examining different types of acquired knowledge and presential knowledge, investigating the incompleteness of his first argument about the accidental nature of presential knowledge and acquired knowledge, revealing the shortcomings of the second and third arguments, and illustrating the insufficiency of his view regarding the union of the intellect and intelligent. In this paper, the author has initially tried to provide an accurate explanation of ‘Alī Qulī Khān’s innovative view on acquired and presential types of knowledge and, then, to examine and criticize this view following an analytic-descriptive method. Manuscript profile