Model and Guiding Framework for Innovative and Entrepreneurial University
Subject Areas : General
reza mahdi
1
,
masoud shafiee
2
1 -
2 -
Keywords: Relation of Industry and University, Innovative and Entrepreneurial University, Value-creating University, Third Generation University, Guiding Framework for Innovative Higher Education Institute (HEInnovative).,
Abstract :
Moving on the path of innovation and entrepreneurship (value-creating) and fulfilling the desired social responsibility is one of the axes of the evolution of universities in recent years, especially in the last two decades. Innovative and value-creating university, for which various definitions have been proposed and various dimensions and criteria have been proposed for its introduction and creation, is one of the new initiatives and ideas for transformation in university systems. Despite identifying and introducing various components and criteria for an innovative and value-creating university, creating this type of university and purposeful and managed movement in the path of innovation and entrepreneurship requires a comprehensive roadmap and a balanced action guide. In order to evolve and achieve a comprehensive model, a guideline framework consisting of eight dimensions, as an action plan and operational model of an innovative and value-creating university by the European Commission and OECD, design and more than 600 universities and higher education institutes in Europe and OECD has evaluated this model. In this paper, through a review of documents, the guide to innovative and value-creating university is introduced as a guide for mainly European programs, for the gradual and systematic transformation of existing universities into innovative and value-creating universities with local considerations. All Iranian universities and higher education institutions with any mission, by learning and adapting actively and productively from this framework and gradually adapting their conditions to its dimensions and criteria, can take fundamental steps in the path of innovation and entrepreneurship and become an innovative and value-creating university in the Relation of Industry and University, Innovative and Entrepreneurial University, Value-creating University, Third Generation University, Guiding Framework for Innovative Higher Education Institute (HEInnovative)true and actual word.
1. دراکر، پیتر (1373)، مدیریت آینده، مترجم: عبدالرضا رضایی‌نژاد، تهران: نشر رسا.
2. عزیزی، محمد و شفیع‌زاده، احسان (1392)، دانشگاه کارآفرین، تهران: گزارش مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
3. مهدی، رضا و شفیعی، مسعود (1397)، نقش¬آفرینی و ظرفیت سازی دانشگاههای نسل چهارم برای توسعه محلی و منطقه‌ای، نشریه صنعت و دانشگاه، شماره 36-35، صص 22-1.
4. مهدی، رضا (1398)، درآمدی بر تعامل دانشگاه با محیط پیرامون، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
5. مهدی، ر.ضا، شفیعی، مسعود. و سینایی، عطاالله. (1398)، درآمدی بر دانشگاه نوآور و کارآفرین، تهران: نشر جامعه‌شناسان.
6. Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: Definition and boundaries. Technical Innovation Management Review, 22–27. Retrieved from http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Saifan_TIMReview_February2012_2.pdf.
7. Blackmore P., Blackwell P. (2006), Strategic leadership in academic development, Higher Education 31(3), pp. 373-387.
8. Bok, D. (2003), Universities in the market place, the commercialization of higher education, Princeton University Press, USA.
9. Clark, B.R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways to Transformation. Oxford, New York, and Tokyo: IAU Press, Pergamon. Coduras, A., D. Urbano, A. Rojas and S. Martínez (2008). The relationship between university support to entrepreneurship with entrepreneurial activity in Spain: A GEM data based analysis’, International Advances in Economic Research, 14(4): 395–406.
10. Coduras, A., J., Levie, D. Kelley, R. Saemundsson and T. Schott (2010), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Special Report: A Global Perspective on Entrepreneurship Education and Training, Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
11. Davies, G. K. (1986). The importance of being general: Philosophy, politics, and institutional mission statements. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 85–102). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
12. Deem R. (2001), Globalization, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: is the local dimension important? Comp Education 37(1), pp. 7-20.
13. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university –industry linkages, Research Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 823-833.
14. Etzkowitz, H. & Mello J. (2004), Rise of the Brazilian Triple Helix’, International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 2(3), pp. 159-171.
15. EU/OECD (2012), A Guiding Framework for Entrepreneurial Universities, Final version 18th December 2012
16. EU/OECD (2018), Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in The Netherlands, OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris/EU, Brussels, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292048.
17. EU/OECD (2019a), Introduction to HEINNOVATE and its seven dimensions, www.heinnovate.eu
18. EU/OECD (2019b), Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in The Italy, OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris/EU, Brussels, https://doi.org/10.1787/43e88f48.
19. EU/OECD (2019c), Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in the Croatia, OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris/EU, Brussels.
20. Fayolle A., O. Basso & Bouchard V. (2010), Three levels of culture and firms’ entrepreneurial orientation: A research agenda, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(7), p707-730.
21. Gibb, A. (2005), Towards the Entrepreneurship University; Entrepreneurship Educdation as a Lever for Change. The National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship (NCGE), UK, policy paper 3.
22. Hendrickson, R. M., Lane, J.E., Harris J.T. & Dorman, R. H. (2013). Academic Leadership and Governance of Higher Education, USA, Stylus Publishing.
23. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M. & Hellsmark, H. (2003), Entrepreneurial Transformations in the Swedish University system: The Case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), pp. 1555-1568.
24. Keyton J. (2002), Understanding Communication Processes, University of Colorado Press.
25. Kirp D.L. (2003), Shakespeare, Einstein and the bottom line. The marketing of higher education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
26. Kirby, D.A. (2006), Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), pp. 599-603.
27. Kreitner, R. & Kinicki A. (2003), Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill Press, pp. 46-49.
28. Mackanzie N. G. & Zhang Q. (2014), A regioanal perspective on the EU: Practices and Policies, Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.188-208.
29. Maurrasse, D. J. (2001). Beyond the campus: How colleges and universities form partnerships with their communities. New York, NY: Routledge.
30. OECD (2017). Knowledge Triangle Synthesis Report – Enhancing the Contributions of Higher Education and Research to Innovation, Paris: OECD.
31. Ropke, J. (1998). The Entrepreneurial University: Innovation, Academic Knowledge Creation and Regional Development in a Globalized Economy. Department of Economics, Philipps-Universitat, Marburg, Germany.
32. Sijde, Peter V. D. (2006), New Concepts for Academic Entrepreneurship, Twente University. Subotzky, G. (1999), ‘Alternatives to the entrepreneurial university: New modes of knowledge production in community service programs’, Higher Education, 38(4), pp. 401-440.
33. Van Vught F. (2008), Mission Diversity and Reputation in Higher Education. Higher Education Policy, 2008, 21, pp. 151-174, International Association of Universities 0952-8733/08, www.palgrave-journals.com/hep.
34. Wissema, J. G. (2009), Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, SA: Edward Elgar.
