Spatial analysis of the impact of social capital on the viability of urban neighborhoods
Subject Areas :
Ayub Manuchehri
1
()
Hasan Ahar
2
()
Mirnajaf Musavi
3
()
Keywords: Maragheh, social capital, habitability, urban neighborhoods,
Abstract :
Urban livability is complex and affected by many factors. according to goals, different approaches are used to measure the livability. The purpose of this research is to analyze the role of social capital on livability of Maragheh neighborhoods. The present study consists of three stages: the study of the livability of neighborhoods, social capital Survey of neighborhoods and Finally, an assessment of the impact of social capital indicators on the level of urban livability. The number of livability indicators was 15. Social capital indicators were 5 main indicators and 39 sub-indicators. The research method has been descriptive – analytical. Data collection was field survey and the tool for data collection questionnaires. the sample size is 383. for data analysis, Multiple Regression and Geographically Weighted Regression has been used. The results show that the results of Geographically Weighted Regression has a better reliability than multivariate regression due to the nature of spatial data. The coefficient of social capital impact has been positive in most neighborhoods of the city of Maragheh. The results showed that 90 percent of the livability of Maragheh neighborhoods is estimated by social capital indicators, these results show the important and influential role of social capital on the livability of urban neighborhoods
˗ توکلي، مرتضي؛ تاجبخش،جهانبخش(1387)بررسي و تحليل ميزان سرمايه اجتماعي در مناطق شهري و روستايي مرزي سيستان،فصلنامه روستا و توسعه، سال11،شماره2،صص143
˗ خراسانی،محمد امین؛ رضوانی، محمد رضا(1392) شناخت و تحلیل تفاوت زیست پذیری روستاهای پیرامون شهری در شهرستان ورامین،فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی،شماره2،پیایی4
˗ عیسی لو، علی اصغر؛ بیات، مصطفی؛ بهرامی، عبدالعلی(1393) انگاره زیست پذیری رهیافی نوین جهت ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در جوامع روستایی، مطالعه موردی:شهرستان قم،بخش کهک،فصلنامه مسکن و محیط روستا،شماره 146، تهران.
˗ مركز آمار ايران (1335- 1390) : نتايج سرشماري عمومي نفوس و مسكن شهرستان مراغه.
˗ موسوي، ميرنجف و همکاران(1391) تحليل فضايي رابطه اي سرمايه اجتماعي و توسعه پايدار شهري مورد: شهرهاي استان آذربايجان غربي،فصلنامه جغرافيا و توسعه،سال دهم،شماره27،تابستان1391
˗ موسوی، میرنجف، حسنی، محمد؛منوچهری، ایوب(1392) تحليل سرمايه اجتماعي شهروندان و تاثير آن بر کيفيت زندگي مورد: محلات شهر مياندوآب،فصلنامه پژوهش های جغرافیایی،شماره
- Appleyard, Donald. )1981( Livable streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Benzeval, M., Judge, K., & W hitehead, M. (1995). Tackling inequalities in health London, England: Kings Fund
- Bosselmann, Peter, & Arens, Edward. )1990( Sun, wind, and pedestrian comfort: A study of Toronto's central area . Toronto: City of Toronto
- Cooper Marcus, Clare, & Francis, Carolyn, eds. ) 1990( People places:Design guidelines for urban open space . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
- Cooper Marcus, Clare, & Sarkissian, Wendy) 1986( Housing as if people mattered. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Crowhurst Lennard, Suzanne H., & Lennard, Henry L.. ) 1995( Livable communities observed. Carmel: Gondolier Press.
- Hills, J. (1995). Inquiry into income and wealth (Vol. 2). York, England: Joseph Rowntree Foundation
- Jacobs, Allan.) 1993( Great streets . Cambridge: MIT Press
- Jacobs, Jane. )1961( The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage
- Lynch, Kevin (1981) A theory of good city form. Cambridge: MIT Press
- Narayan, D. and Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change. Vol. 47(4), pages871 897.
- North Central Texas Council of Governments(2011). Mobility 2035. Retrieved from http://www.nctcog.org
- Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeingd a socialgeographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65,19 e30
- Putnam, R D )2000( Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York,.
- Ruth,M & Franklin, R(2014) Livability for all? Conc eptual limits and practical implications, Applied Geography 49 (2014) 18 e23
- Shamsuddin, S; Abu Hassanb,N; Bilyamin, S(2012) Walkable Environment in Increasing the Liveability of a City, ASEAN Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies .Bangkok, Thailand, 16-18 July 2012, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50 ( 2012 ) 167 – 178
- Wheeler ,S(2001) Livable Communities: Creating Safe and Livable Neighborhoods, Towns, and Regions in California, University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
-Coleman, J.S., (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94, 95–120
-Forrest, R., Kearns, A.,( 2001) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood.Urban Studies 38, 2125–2143.
-House, J.S., Landis, K.R., Umberson, D., (1988) Social relationships and health. Science241, 540–545
-Storper, M., Venables, A.J., (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy.Journal of Economic Geography 4, 351–370
-Yusuf, S.A. (2008). Social Capital and Household Welfare in Kwara State, Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology, Vol. 23, No.3, pp. 219-229.[18] Woolcock, M. And Narayan, D. (2000). Soci
