The role of construction and exploitation of the Alavian dam in the evolution of the spatial system of rural settlements in Maragheh and Bonab areas (1995-2017)
Subject Areas :
Rasol Ghaffarirad
1
,
ِAbaas Saidi
2
1 -
2 -
Abstract :
Dam construction is one of the most important development activities to respond to the increasing demand of potable, agricultural and industrial water. The effects and consequences (positive and negative) of a dam, as is directly visible in each component that are considered as a part of geographical spaces has also various visible and invisible signs and symptoms. In this regard dam construction has spatial dimensions and is considered within the spatial planning framework. So as various structures and functions (environmental, social, cultural, political, etc. are considered in spatial systems, therefore reviewing the structural-functional changes caused by the construction of dams and irrigation networks is necessary since it causes organization or disturbances/disruption of a spatial system. This paper aim to investigate the role of implementation and exploitation of Alavian dam irrigation network (which is operating with more than twenty-three years) in organizing the spatial system of rural settlements. The research method has been logical and by using quantitative and qualitative methods, the required information was collected. 370 households were selected using Cochran formula as the statistical sample. For analyzing the data, descriptive and inferential statistics has been used in SPSS (Kendal correlation test, Chi-square, Independence squared, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney). The results has been showed that structural-functional changes due to the implementation of the project, in terms of top-down approach did not lead to the organization and development of the spatial system of rural settlements in the study area. Also, there is a significant relationship between the location of settlements, political-administrative divisions of the districts and the developments of the spatial system and the dam, in such a way that the construction of the dam has caused uneven development and disturbance of the spatial system between upstream settlements of the dam (in reservoir area) and downstream of the dam (irrigation network) and in Maragheh and Bonab.
1. بهنام، جمشید(1375)، ايرانيان و انديشه تجدد، تهران، انتشارات نشر و پژوهش روزافزون، چاپ اول
2. تقي¬¬¬¬¬¬¬ زاده طبري، اباصالح(1388)، "اصلاحات در مكتب نوسازي(از نوسازي تا پسانوسازي)"، مجله ره آورد سیاسی، تابستان و پاییز 1388، سال هفتم، شماره 24 و 25، صص 91- 106
3. سعيدي، عباس(1393)، "توسعه پايدار: شالوده ها و الزامات"، انتشارات دانشگاه شهيد بهشتي، 1دانشكده علوم زمين، چاپ اول، 1393، صص 61- 91
4. سعيدي، عباس(1391)، "مفاهيم بنيادين در برنامه‌ريزي کالبدي- فضايي(بخش اول)"، فصلنامه برنامه‌ريزي كالبدي- فضائي، شماره 1، زمستان 1391، صص 9- 26
5. سعيدي، عباس(1391)، "پويش ساختاري- کارکردي، رويکردي بديل در برنامه‌ريزي فضايي"، فصلنامة اقتصاد فضا و توسعة روستايي، سال يکم، شمارة 1، پاييز 1391، صص 1- 19
6. سعيدي، عباس و صدوق، سيد حسن (1385)، "نظام فضائي به مثابه جوهرة مطالعات جغرافيائي"، نشريه علمي- پژوهشي جغرافيا، سال چهارم، شماره 10 و 11، پائيز و زمستان 1385، صص 7- 20
7. سعيدي، عباس، كاوه معصومي، عبدالرضا رحماني فضلي و جواد اطاعت(1397): "حكمراني آب و توسعه منطقه اي، مورد: منطقه آبياري كرخه(خوزستان)"، فصلنامة جغرافيا، سال شانزدهم، شمارة 56، بهار 1397
8. شركت مديريت منابع آب ايران (1397)
9. مركز آمار ايران (1395)، داده هاي سرشماري عمومي نفوس و مسكن 1395
10. مظفري نيا، مهدي و همكاران( 1395): "اندیشه شناسی سیاسی نظریه مراحل رشد اقتصادی روستو"، فصلنامه مطالعات ميان رشته اي در علوم انساني، شماره 2، بهار 95، صص 157- 176
11. مهندسين مشاور مهاب قدس (1358): "طرح چندمنظوره صوفي چاي، مطالعات مرحله دوم، گزارش جامعه شناسي"
12. مهندسين مشاور مهاب قدس (1365): "طرح چندمنظوره صوفي چاي، مطالعات مرحله دوم، گزارش نهائي توجيه اقتصادي سد علويان و شبكه آبياري صوفي چاي"
13. Frank Vanclay,(2015),Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social imoacts for projects, International Association for Impact Assessment,pp1-107
14. Jansson, Roland,(2014),The effect of dams on biodiversity, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science,Umeå University, Ecological Applications 10, 203-224
15. Kibler, K., D. Tullos, B. Tilt, A. Wolf, D. Magee, E. Foster-Moore, F. Gassert,(2012), Integrative Dam Assessment Model (IDAM) Documentation: Users Guide to the IDAM Methodology and a Case Study from Southwestern China. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, pp1-90
16. Kirchherr, J. and Charles, (2016), The social impacts of dams: A new framework for scholarly analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99-114
17. Leturq, Guillaume (2016), Diffedences and Simlarities in impacts of Hydroeletric Dams between north and south of Brazil, 265-286
18. M. Sait Tahiscioglu and Nermin Anul,(2005), Positive and Negative impacts of dams on the Environment, 759-769
19. Paul Reig, Andrew Maddocks and Francis Gassert (2013), World’s 36 Most Water-Stressed Countries, Published on World Resources Institute
20. Philip H. Brown, Desiree Tullos, Bryan Tilt, Darrin Magee, Aaron T. Wolf (2008), Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective, Journal of Environmental Management, 1-9
21. Régis Garandeau, Stephen Edwards, Mark Maslin,(2014), Biophysical, socioeconomic and geopolitical impacts assessments of large dams: an overview, 1-16
22. Shirazu Alhassan, Henry,(2008), Large dams:a development imperative, a tyranny of Technology”, or a Subversion of Southern Countries’ Development?, University of East Angelia,School of Developmen studies,1-294
23. United Nations Development Programe, (2016), Local action for the global goals: Promoting innovative conservation and development solutions. New York, NY: UNDP.
24. World Commission on Dams (WCD)(2010), Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making; Earthscan: London, 1-356
