Criticism of the Unanimous Decision No. 845 Dated 27 ⁄ 2 ⁄ 2024 of the General Panel of the Supreme Court Regarding the Cancellation of the Auction
Subject Areas : حقوق مدنیآرمان یعقوبی مقدم 1 , خیرالله هرمزی 2
1 - Master of Private Law, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 -
Keywords: Auction, unanimous vote, annulment, judicial procedure,
Abstract :
Before the issuance of the unanimous decision No. 845 of the General Panel of the Supreme Court, there was a serious difference of opinion in the judicial procedure regarding the hearing or non-hearing of the auction cancellation lawsuit in general and also the instances of auction cancellation. The result of this difference of opinion led to the issuance of the aforementioned unanimous decision. In this article, we will examine the formal and substantive aspects of the auction cancellation lawsuit and criticize the unanimous decision issued.
1. Jafari Tabar, H. (2020).Demon in the Glass: Philosophy of Judicial Procedure, second edition, Tehran: Negah Moasar Publishing House. [In Persian]
2. Shams, A.(2018) Execution of Civil Judgments, Volume 2: Order (Method) of Execution, Second Edition, Tehran: Drak Publications. [In Persian]
3. Nahrini, F.(2022). Temporary Order in Iranian Law and Research in Comparative Law, 4th edition, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publications. [In Persian]
