The effect of collaborative learning method on first grade students of Yasouj city
Subject Areas : Planning science
Gulnar Salehikhah
1
(Payam Noor Yasouj University)
Maryam Bastam
2
(Bushehr Azad University)
ziba Bastam
3
(Dr. Moin State University)
Keywords: Collaborative learning method, individual teaching method of dyslexic students, the first grade of elementary school in Yasouj city,
Abstract :
The purpose of this research is the effect of cooperative learning method on the first grade students of Yasouj city and whether their reading problems can be solved in a group and with each other's help or not. Therefore, two learning methods, One Saw I and Jake Saw II, have been used to investigate its effect on improving children's reading and learning. According to the subject, the semi-experimental method of the pre-test-post-test design has been chosen. Hoshi and Kessler's scale was used to collect the data, and to determine the level of students' reading disorder, the reading recognition test known as the Shirazi test was used. Also, the data obtained from the results of the pre-test, post-test, post-test and delayed test were used to collect information. . The validity coefficient was estimated to be 0.85 and the reliability coefficient was 0.95 for the total scale, 0.93 for the class scale and 0.9 for the practical scale, and the mean of the reliability coefficients was 0.73. In the learning disorders center, an instructor provided educational services to 20 students during the week, and preferably 40 students were trained on two occasions. In this research, 20 students of the first term were randomly selected as the experimental group and 20 students of the second term were included as the control group. The information collected using the t-test of independent groups (t-test) and spss software was used for statistical work to compare the performance of two independent test and reference groups. The findings of the research show that cooperative learning is effective in reducing the problems of the first grade of elementary school compared to the individual education method. It is concluded from the hypotheses that cooperative learning is effective in not adding or removing words in the text compared to the individual education method, so we can conclude It was concluded that the students who were trained in cooperative method have better performance in acquiring reading skills.
• ارنشتاین، آلن سی،(۱۹۹۳). مبانی اصول و مسائل برنامه‌ی درسی جلد ۱و۲ ترجمه‌ی قدسی.احثر.(۱۳۷۶). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات
• تبریزی، مصطفی.(۱۳۸۰). درمان اختلالات خواندن. تهران: نشر گفتمان خلاق.
• سیف نراقی، مریم و نادری، عزت‌الله. (۱۳۸۷). روانشناسی کودکان عقب‌مانده ذهنی و روش‌های آموزش آن‌ها . تهران: انتشارات سمت (در دست چاپ)
• سیف نراقی، مریم و نادری، عزت‌الله.(۱۳۷۱). بررسی روند رشد تکلم و زبان فارسی کودکان از تولد تا ۸ سالگی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت‌معلم.
• فقیهی، فاطمه.(۱۳۸۱). جمع‌بندی تحقیقات انجام‌شده پیرامون یادگیری مشارکتی. فصلنامه اعیان و تربیت، دوره هشتم، شماره ۳.
• قلتاش، عباس.(۱۳۸۳). بررسی تأثیر یادگیری مشارکتی بر رشد مهارت‌های اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان پسر پایه‌ی پنجم ابتدایی شهرکرد. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت‌معلم تهران.
• ناعمی، محمد.(۱۳۸۳). روانشناسی آموزش خواندن مشهد. انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی.
• نریمانی، محمد (۱۳۸۰). رفتاردرمانی. انتشارات اتقیا.
• Fleycher, J. and Forman. B. (1994). Issues In Definition and Measurment of Learning Disabilities. In G. Lyon Ed, Frames of Refernce For The Assessment of Children Whith Learning Disabilities. (pp. 185-202). Baltimor: Paul H. Brookes.
• Kavil. K. (1981). Psychopharmacologic Treatment: A Note On Classroom Effects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 48-55.
• Poblano,Adrian.(2005).Characteristies of Speeific Reading in Children From Neuro Psychologic in Mexico:Salud
• Rareky, B.P. (1991). Neuropsychological Validation of Learding Disability Subtypes. New York: Guliford Press.
• Ring, T. Richard.A. Wesiz. (1976).Intrceduction to Pbychology. Mc Graw- Hill. International Edition. New York.
• Slavin, R. (1990). Research on Cooperative Learning: Consus and Contoovry. Educational Leadership Vol. 4 No. 47.
• Thomson, M. (1995). Developmental Dyslecxia. Third Eddition, Whurr Book, London.
• Torgesen, J. (1981) Problems In The Study of Learning Disabilities. Hertyheri- ngton & J. Hagen (EDS.), Review of Research In Child Development Vol. 5. pp. 162-184.
• Torgesen., J. (1994). Issuse In The Assessment of Executive Function. Batimore: Paul H. Brookes.
