International Institutions; Mathematica Modeling of Change from G5 to G20
Subject Areas : Politics
1 -
Keywords: International Institutions G5 G20 Performance Evaluation Quantification,
Abstract :
International Institutions, though one of key global actors and topics of International Studies, are rarely studied by focusing on the internal processes of change. A justification for lack of research could be the challenges in quantifying internal changes and processes. Hence, the proliferation of qualitative takes relying on personal analysis. Given the importance of cooperation groups in global governance, this article asks what is the degree of change in the process of expansion of G5 into G20? Utilising quantitative and mathematical methods, the study offers an equation based on data provided by the World Back. The equation proves a model to analyse track-records, which seemingly suggests highest performance by G7 and lowest for G8.
اماميميبدي، علي (1379)، اصول اندازهگیری کارایی و بهرهوری (علمی- کاربردی)، تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات پژوهشهاي بازرگاني.
تسليمي، محمدسعيد (1380) مديريت تحول سازماني، تهران: سمت.
مولر، جان هنري (1389)، استدلال آماري در جامعهشناسی، ترجمه هوشنگ نايبي، تهران: ني.
Arora, Akshita (2013), Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study from India, Doctoral thesis, Faridabad, Haryana, India: National Institute of Financial Management
Bayne, Nicholas (2009), Staying Together: the G8 Summit Confronts the 21st Century, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bayne, Nicholas & Woolcock, Stephen (2007), the New Economic Diplomacy, Aldershot: Ashgate
Clinton, B. (2005), My Life: Volume II, The Presidential Years, Vintage.
Cooper, Andrew F. (2009), In Search of a Global Solution, Available at: www.cigionline.org/articles/2009/04/search-global-solution
Fardoust, S. (2010), Postcrisis growth and development: A development agenda for the G-20, World bank publications.
Gutner, T. & Thompson, A. (2010), “The politics of IO performance: A framework”, The review of international organizations, Vol.5, No.3: 227-248.
King, G. (1990), “On political methodology”, Political Analysis, Vol.2, No.1: 1-29.
Kirton, J. (2005), “Toward multilateral reform: the G20’s contribution”, Reforming from the Top: A leaders, Vol.20, No.3: 141-168.
Kirton, John J. (2005), Toward Multilaterl Reform: the G20’s Contribution in Reforming from the top: A Leaders’ 20 Summit, Tokyo: UNU press
Leininger, J. (2009), “Think big!” Future prospects of the international summit architecture–the G20, G8, G5, and the Heiligendamm Dialogue Process.
Lesage, D. (2007), “Globalisation, Multipolarity and the L20 as an Alternative to the G8”, Global Society, Vol.21, No.3: 343-361.
MacGranahan, D. Pizarro, E. & Richard, C. (1985), Measurement and Analysis of Socio-economic Development: An Enquiry Into International Indicators of Development and Quantitative Interrelations of Social and Economic Components of Development, United Nations research institute for social development.
Maoqing, Z. (2010), “From G8 to G20”, The Beijing Review, Vol 8.
Martin, P. (2007). “Breaking Deadlocks in Global Governance: The L-20 Proposal”, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, Vol.13, No.3: 301-305.
Mc Granahan, Donald, Pizaro, Edvardo & Richard Claude (1985), Measurment and Analysis of Socio-Economic Development, Geneva: UNRISD Publications
Putnam, Robert & Nicholas Bayen (1987), Hanging Toghether: Cooperation and Conflict in the Seven-Power Summits, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Wouters, Jan & Marx, Axel (2007), “Efficiency of Accountability Instruments in International Organizations”, Leuven Center for Global Governance, Brussels, Belgium
Yule, G. U. & Kendall, M. G. (1924), An introduction to the theory of statistics, Bull Amer Math Soc: 465-466.
