Recent Advanced in Minimally Invasive Surgery; A Review on New Procedures and Instruments
Subject Areas : Veterinary Soft and Hard Tissue SurgeryMahdieh Katebian 1 , Mir Sepehr Pedram 2 , Mohammad Yasan Bangash 3 , mahbobeh abdi 4
1 - Tehran University
2 - University of Tehran
3 - Tehran University
4 - ندارد
Keywords: , Endoscopy Laparoscopy, minimally invasive procedures ,
Abstract :
Minimally invasive surgeries are one of the most important revolutions in the history of surgery. recently, different methods of this type of surgery are widely used in medicine and veterinary medicine. With recent advances in minimally invasive surgery, a variety of surgical methods have been introduced. Laparoscopic gallbladder resection is the most common type of minimally invasive surgery and many other surgeries have been introduced in the same way. This article introduces new methods in minimally invasive surgery. The further use of this type of surgery depends entirely on the development of new technologies in this field. The success of surgical procedures in the treatment of diseases is always measured by the amount of pain and trauma that the surgical method inflicts on the patient. Reducing these two factors has led to the progression and change surgical methods with minimal invasions in general and laparoscopic surgeries particularly in the last century.
1- Lee WJ, Chan CP, Wang BY, Recent Advances in Laparoscopic Surgery. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery 2013, vol.6, no13, 1-8.
2- Matsuda T, Recent advances in urologic laparoscopic surgeries: laparoendoscopic single site surgery, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, robotic and navigation. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery 2013. Vol 6, no 10. 68-77
3- Bingener J, Ibrahim-zada I, Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for intra-abdominal emergency condition. British Journal of Surgery, Volume 101, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages e80–e89
4- Halim I, Tavakkolizadeh A, NOTES: The next surgical revolution? International Journal of Surgery, 2008 Aug; 6(4): 273-6
5- Dhumane PW, Diana M, Leroy J, Marescaux J, Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: A technological review. J Minim Access Surg, 2011 Jan; 7(1): 40-51
6- Pan A, Poi M, Matos J, et al, Long-Term Outcomes of Single-Port Laparoscopic Placement of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter, Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Lul; 50(5): 343-8
7- Ates O, Hakguder G, Olguner M, Akgur FM, Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture. J Pediatric surgery. 2007 Jun; 42 (6): 1071-4
8- Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel Ph, Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Oct; 23(10): 1013-6
9- Payne T, Dauterive FR, A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. May-Jun 2008; 15(3): 286-91
10- Dhepnorrarat RC, Witterick IJ, New technologies in thyroid cancer surgery. Oral Oncol. 2013 Jul; 49(7): 659-64
11- Lui H, Lu D, Wang L, et al. Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012. Vol 2: 78-89
12- Zidan N, Durand A, Guevar J, et al. Minimally invasive spine surgery in dogs: Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a thoracolumbar approach to the spinal cord. Veterinary Surgery. Volume 49. Issue S1. June 2020. Pages 076-085
13- Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique. SPINE Volume 33, Number 9, pp 322-28, 2008, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
14- Park J, Ham D, et al. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications. Asian spinal Journal. Oct 2020. 14(5):694-701
15- Harrell A, Kercher K, Heniford B, Energy sources in laparoscopy Surgery. Semin laparosc Surg, 2004, vol 11: 201-9,
16- Hancock R, Comparison of Postoperative Pain Following Ovariohysterectomy via Harmonic Scalpel-Assisted Laparoscopy Versus Traditional Celiotomy In Dogs, Thesis MSc, 2005
17- Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003 Dec; 13(6):377-80
18- Sutton PA, Awad S, Perkins AC, Lobo DN, Comparison of lateral thermal spread using monopolar and bipolar diathermy, the Harmonic Scalpel™ and the Ligasure. British Journal of Surgery, Volume 97, Issue 3, March 2010, 428–433
19- Klingler C, Remzi M, Marberger M, Janetschek G, Haemostasis in Laparoscopy. European Urology. Volume 50, Issue 5, November 2006, Pages 948-957
20- Greenberg JA, SonicisionTM cordless ultrasonic dissection device. Rev Obs Gynecol, 2013, 6(2): 100-101
21- Mishra V. Comparative Study between Harmonic Scalpel and LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: In Open and Laparoscopic Surgery. World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2013;6(2):74-76
