Psychometric Adequacy of Women's Sexual Well-being Scale in Married Women: Validity, Reliability and Factor Structure
Subject Areas : Other related topics
reza chalmeh
1
,
fatemeh abdolahi
2
1 -
2 - دانشگاه فاطمیه
Keywords: Sexual well-being, Women, Married Women, Factor Structure, Validity, Reliability.,
Abstract :
The aim of this study was to investigate the validity, reliability and factor structure of the Female Sexual Well-Being Scale in Iranian married women. For this purpose, a sample of 297 married women (with a mean age of 33.7 years and an age range of 24 to 45 years) was selected by simple random sampling. The Psychological Well-Being Questionnaire (Reef, 1995) and Women's Sexual Well-Being Scale (Rosen et al., 2009) were completed by the sample group. The validity of this scale was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis methods, convergent and simultaneous validity. The reliability of the scale was evaluated by two methods of Cronbach's alpha and halving. The results of factor analysis using principal component method and varimax rotation showed that this scale consists of 4 factors with the titles of interpersonal relationships, cognitive-emotional domain, physical stimulation and orgasm satisfaction, which is more than 66% of the variance. They explain the whole. The convergent validity of this scale indicated a satisfactory correlation between the dimensions of the female sexual well-being scale and the total score. To determine the simultaneous validity of the scale, the correlation between the dimensions of the female sexual well-being scale and the psychological well-being scale was used, which indicated a favorable correlation (p <0.001). Cronbach's alpha and halving coefficients for the whole scale and its dimensions ranged from 0.63 to 0.82. The final result is that the Persian form of the Women's Sexual Welfare Scale has good validity and reliability in Iranian society and can be used in research, educational and clinical situations.
باقیان، اعظم.(1393). بررسی برخی علل منجر به تقاضای طلاق در زوجین متقاضی طلاق در دادگاه های
تهران، مجله تخصصی اپیدمیولوژی ایران، (1):83-93.
جوشن لو، محسن؛ رستمي، رضا و نصرت آبادي، مسعود .(1385). بررسي ساختار عاملي مقياس بهزيستي جامع، فصلنامه روانشناسي تحولي: روانشناسان ايراني، سال سوم، شماره 9،35-51.
شاکرمی، محمد؛ داورنیا، رضا؛ زهراکار، کیانوش و گوهری، شیوا.(1393). تاثیر آموزش جنسی بر صمیمیت جنسی زنان متاهل. روان پرستاری. ۲ (۱) :۳۴-۴۲.
نائينيان، محمدرضا؛ نيك آذين، امير.(1391). رابطه صميميت و رضايت جنسي با سلامت عمومي و بهزيستي شخصي: بررسي تفاوت هاي جنسيتي و سني؛ 745-735 .
Adelson, E., Nastasi, B. K., Maitra, S., Ballal, D., & Rajan, L. (2016). Sexual health, gender roles, and psychological well-being: Voices of female adolescents from urban slums of India. In B. K. Nastasi & A. P. Borja (Eds.), International Handbook of Psychological Well-Being in Children and Adolescents (pp. 79–96). New York, U.S.A.: Springer.
Brotto, L. A., & Ginsberg, S. (2010). Sexual consequences of cancer survivorship. In S. E. Althof (Ed.), Handbook of clinical sexuality for mental health professionals(pp. 347-366). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Casique, I. (2019). Gender differences in the sexual well-being of Mexican adolescents. International Journal of Sexual Health, 31(1), 1-16.
Harden, K. P. (2014). A sex-positive framework for research on adolescent sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 455–469.
Meston, C., & Trapnell, P. (2005). outcomes assessment: development and validation of a five‐factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: the sexual satisfaction scale for women (SSS‐W). The journal of sexual medicine, 2(1), 66-81.
Mona, L., Syme, M., Goldwaser, G., Cameron, R., Chen, S., Clemency, C. ... Lemos, L. (2011). Sexual health in older adults: Conceptualization and treatment In K. Sorocco & S. Lauderdale (Eds.), Implementing CBT for older adults: Inno-vations across care settings (pp. 263-287). New York: Springer.
Rosen, R.C., Bachmann, G.A., Reese, J.B., Gentner, L., Leiblum, S., and Wanser, R.(2009). Female Sexual Well-Being Scale™ (FSWB Scale™): Development
and Psychometric Validation in Sexually Functional Women, Journal of Sex Media,6, 1297–1305.
Rust, J., & Golombok, S. (1983). Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction. International Society for Research on Sex Education.
Ryff, C. D & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 719-727.
Sanchez, F.M., Santos I.p., Sierra J.C.(2014).A systematicreview of sexual satisfaction.International Journal of Clinical andHealth Psycology, 14(1): 67-75.
Stevens, P.(2015). Culture and sexuality, The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality, First Edition. Edited by Patricia Whelehan and Anne Bolin. Published Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Syme, M.L., & Cohn, T.J. (2016). Examining aging sexual stigma attitudes among adults by gender, age, and generational status. Aging Ment Health 20(1),36–45.
Tavares, I.M., Schlagintweitb, H.E., Nobre, P.J., & Rosen, N.O.(2019). Sexual well-being and perceived stress in couples transitioning to parenthood: A dyadic analysis, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 19, 198---208.
Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. (2005). The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 31(1), 1-20.
