Identification and Classification of Action Plans Influencing Sustainable Production, using Repertory Grid and Principal Component Analysis Case Study: Industrial Production Companies in Semnan Province
Subject Areas :Mohammad ali Shariat 1 , Soleyman Iranzadeh 2 , Alireza Bafandeh Zendeh 3
1 - Islamic Azad University
2 -
3 - Islamic Azad University
Keywords: Principal Component Analysis Sustainable Production Repertory Grid Personal construct theory,
Abstract :
The production sector has come under severe pressure to both cope with its problems and maintain competitiveness, by such factors as diminishing natural resources, climate change, worsening environmental pollution, ecological incompatibility of the industrial age activities with the environment, and the decline in quality of human life due to the increasing global industrialization. Meanwhile, sustainability, especially in production, and progress towards sustainable production have grown in importance for developed countries aiming to overcome their challenges for a sustainable development. Sustainability is an increasingly significant need for human activities, and achieving a sustainable development has turned into a major priority for human development. Sustainable development is a landscape that simultaneously targets social, economic, and environmental issues in general within the process of development. Meanwhile, the concept of sustainable production, which is intertwined with the concept of sustainable development, targets manufacturing companies and service providers. This study is focused on sustainability of manufacturing businesses, aiming to both identify sustainable production constructs, and evaluate and classify programs that can play a more effective role in this regard. First, dimensions and constructs of sustainable production were identified through interviews and relying on repertory grid technique, from the viewpoint of 33 managers in successful industrial production companies with at least five consecutive and sustainable years of activity across Semnan Province in Iran. Then 33 personal repertory grids and a total of 175 primary personal constructs were elicited for sustainable production. These constructs were explored and analyzed, and an aggregated grid consisting of 87 secondary constructs was drawn. Next, using principal component analysis (PCA), the principal constructs contributing to sustainable production were categorized into two major concepts and their components were determined
1. داناییفرد، حسن، کاظمی، سید حسین (1389). «ارتقای پژوهشهای تفسیری در سازمان: مروری بر مبانی فلسفی و فرآیند اجرای روش پدیدار نگاری». مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول، شماره 69، صفحات 121-148#
2. داناییفرد، حسن، الوانی، سید مهدی، آذر، عادل (1387). روششناسی پژوهش کمی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات صفار – اشراقی#
3. داناییفرد، حسن، جندقی، غلامرضا؛ الوانی، مهدی؛ نیکرفتار، طیبه (1389). «الگوهای ذهنی خبرگان در مورد چالشهای دولت افقی در ایران». چشمانداز مدیریت دولتی، شماره 2، صفحات 9-24#
4. داناییفرد، حسن؛ خائف الهی، احمدعلی؛ خداشناس لیلا السادات (1391). «فهم جوهره تجربه بازنشستگی کارکنان در بخش دولتی؛ پژوهشی پدیدارشناسانه». اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی، شماره 2، صفحات 153-176#
5. داناییفرد، حسن؛ زنگویی نژاد، ابوذر (1390). «تئوری شایستهسالاری مدیریتی بر مبنای استراتژی داده بنیاد: برداشتی از نهجالبلاغه». راهبردهای بازرگانی، شماره 47، صفحات 243-264#
6. داناییفرد، حسن، نوری، علی (1390). «گفتمانی بر تحلیل گفتمان در مطالعات سازمانی: تأملی بر مبنای نظری و اسلوب اجرا». روششناسی علوم انسانی. شماره 69، صفحات 163-192#
7. کیمیایی، سید علی (1388). «مشاوره و رواندرمانی پستمدرن». تازههای رواندرمانی، شمارههای 53 و 54، صفحات 50-70#
8. داناییفرد، حسن؛ مرتضوي، ليلا؛ فاني، علیاصغر؛ آذر، عادل (1394). «فهم شناختي مديران از اثربخشي مديريتي: كاربست روش شبكه خزانه». مديريت فرهنگسازمانی. شماره 2، صفحات 317-342#
9. Bhattacharya, A.; Jain, R.; Choudhary, A. (2011). “ Green Manufacturing”. The Boston Consulting Group Report: 7-18.
10. Bourne, H.; Jenkins, M. (2005). “Eliciting managers` personal values: An adaptation of the laddering interview method“. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4): 410-428.
11. Basmer, S.; Buxbaum-Conradi, S.; Krenz, P.; Redlich, T.; Wulfsberg, J. P.; Bruhns, F.-L. (2015) .”Open Production: Chances for Social Sustainability in Manufacturing “Procedia CIRP 26: 46-51.
12. B. Hamner, “What is the relationship between cleaner production, pollution prevention, waste minimization and ISO 14000? ” The 1st Asian Conference on cleaner production, Taipei, Taiwan, 1996.
13. Cohen-Rosenthal, E. (2000), “A walk on the human side of industrial ecology”, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol.44, No.2: 245-264.
14. Costa, I. Massard, G., Agarwal, A. (2010), “Waste mana- gement policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.18, No.8: 815–822.
15. Chertow, M. R. (2000), “Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy”, Annual Review of Energy and the Envi- ronment, Vol.25: 313-337.
16. Chiarini, A.(2014) “Sustainable manufacturing-greening processes using specific Lean Production tools: an empirical observation from European motorcycle component manufacturers”, Journal of Clear Production 85 (2014): 226-233.
17. Chatterjee, R.; Sharma, V.; Kumar, S. (2012). “Eco-efficiency from cradle to grave design system based on atmospheric conditions in the biodiesel manufacturing sector produced from Jatropha curcas for sustainable cleaner production”, Int. J. Sustainable Manufacturing, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2012: 261-275.
18. Erkman, S. (1997), “Industrial ecology: a historical view”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.5, No.1-2: 1-10.
19. Fransella, F.; Bell, R.; Bannister, D. (2004). A Manual For Repertory Grid Technique.
20. Feng, Shaw C.; Joung, Che B. (2009). “An Overview of a Proposed Measurement Infrastructure for Sustainable Manufacturing “The 7th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing.
21. Jankowicz, Devi. (2004). The easy guide to repertory grids. John wily & sons. England.
22. Joung, Che B. ; Carrell, John; Sarkar, Prabir; C. Feng ,Shaw. (2012).” Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing”. Ecological Indicators 24 (2012): 148–157.
23. Loures, L.(2008).” Industrial Heritage: the past in the future of the city”,,Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development ,Issue 8, Volume 4, August 2008: 687-699.
24. Ma, A.; Norwich, B. (2007). “Triangulation and Theoretical Understanding“. Social Research Methodology, 10(3):211-226.
25. Manly. B.F., 1986,Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. London, UK:Chapman and Hall.
26. Niu, N.; Easterbrook, S. (2007).“So you think you know others` goals? A repertory grid study“.Journal IEEE Software, 24(2):53-61.
27. Nambiar, A. (2010), “Challenges in Sustainable Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industr ia l Engineering and Ope r ations M a n a g e m e n t , Dhaka , Bang l a d e sh, January 9-10,2010.
28. Posch, A. (2010), “Industrial Recycling Networks as Star- ting Points for Broader Sustainability-Oriented Coope- ration?”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol.14, No.2 :242-257.
29. Ralley, C.; Allott, R.; Hare, D. J.; Wittkowski, A. (2009). “The use of the repertory grid technique to examine staff beliefs about clients with dual diagnosis“. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 16(2):148-158.
30. Senior, B. (1997). “Team performance: using repertory grid technique to gain a view from the inside”. Team Performance Management, 3(1):33-39.
31. Sustainability, Team Spotlights Top 50 Corporate Sustainability Reports. GreenBiz, November15, 2000, http://www.greenbiz.com/news/newsFthird.cfm?NewsID-13397.
32. Tan, F. B.; Hunter, M. G. (2002). “The Repertory Grid Technique: A Method for the Study of Cognition in Information Systems“. MIS Quarterly, 26(1):39-57.
33. Von, V. (2009). An integrated method to assess consumer motivation in difficult market Niches: A case of the premium car segment Russia. master of science in Economics. MarinaShcheglova, Berlin University.
34. Vision 2020 , Additional Sustainability information to the Siemens Annual Report 2014, [on line: siemens.com].
35. Van de Kerkhof, M.; Cuppen, E.; Hisschemoller, M. (2009). “The repertory grid to unfold conflictingpositions: The case of a stakeholder dialogue on prospects for hydrogen“. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(3):422-432.
36. V. Veleva, M. Ellenbecker (2001). “Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology”. Journal of Cleaner Production 9:519–549.
37. Wright R. P. (2008). “Eliciting Cognitions of Strategizing Using Advanced Repertory Grids in a World Constructed and Reconstructed“. Organizational Research Methods 11(4):753-769.
38. Wilson, F.; Tagg, S. (2010).” Social constructionism and personal constructivism: Getting the business owner`s view on the role of sex and gender“. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(1):68-82