The Role of Agile Manufacturing in Improving Organizational Productivity
Subject Areas :
gholamreza hashemzade khorasegani
1
,
Mohammad Reza Bahrami
2
1 -
2 -
Keywords: Agile Manufacturing Organizational Productivity Customer Orientation Cost Management,
Abstract :
Today, the increase in instability and turbulence in organizational environments has made organizations achieve certain levels of agile manufacturing to meet the needs of their customers in unpredictable conditions, as agile manufacturing is considered the major contributor to the success and survival of firms. However, many manufacturing firms do not pay much attention to such issues. This paper was mainly aimed at investigating the role of agile manufacturing in improving organizational productivity. To this end, a number of employees at Moghan Wire & Cable Company were selected as the study sample. The research was an applied cross-sectional survey. Simple random sampling was used to select 134 managers, specialists and employees familiar with agile manufacturing at Moghan Wire & Cable Company. After identifying productivity and agile manufacturing indicators, a questionnaire was designed. The questionnaire’s validity was confirmed by professors and a group of experts at Moghan Wire & Cable Company. Cronbach’s alpha was used to evaluate the questionnaire’s reliability. The questionnaire’s Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to analyze the collected data and find the relationships between the variables. The analyses were performed using SPSS 20 and SmartPLS 2. The results showed that high levels of agile manufacturing had a significant influence on productivity at Moghan Wire & Cable Company.
1. آذربايجاني، کریم. ١٣۶٨، اندازه‌گیری و تجزیه‌وتحلیل بهره‌وری صنايع کشور؛ اصفهان، سازمان برنامه‌وبودجه استان اصفهان.
2. العبیدی, م ج. 1392 ، مطالعه نقش کیفی نگهداری و تعمیرات بر چابک سازی فرآیند نگهداری و تعمیرات ( مطالعه موردی : کارخانه فولاد آلیاژی ایران )
3. خوش‌سیما, غ. ( 1382 ). مقدمه‌ای بر چابکی در سازمان¬ها. مدیریت, تدبیر شماره 134. 55-58
4. سکاران, ا. (1384). روش‌های تحقيق در مديريت (نسخه چاپ سوم). (ت. م. شيرازي, مترجم) تهران: موسسه عالي آموزش و پژوهش مديريت و برنامهريزي.
5. سرمد، ز. بازرگان، ع. حجازي، ا. 1380. روش‌های تحقيق در علوم رفتاري (نسخه چاپ پنجم). تهران: انتشارات آگاه.
6. شهائی، ب. و رجب زاده، ع. 1384، بررسی ابعاد ارزیابی چابکی سازمانی در سازمان‌های دولتی با رویکرد فناوري اطلاعات، دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت فناوري اطلاعات و ارتباطات، اسفندماه.
7. نیک پور, ا و برکم, ی. ( 1391 ). چابکی سازمانی و مدل دست‌یابی به یک سازمان چابک. اقتصاد, راهبرد توسعه/یاس شماره 30 ( علمی-ترویجی ). 151-171
8. Arteta ,B.M. & Giachetti, R.E.,(2004). A Measure of Agility as the complexity of enterprise system, Robotics and computer integarted manufacturing,24: 495-503
9. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. ((1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research. 18(1),: 39-50.
10. Khalili-Damghani, Tavana. (2013). A new fuzzy network data envelopment analysis model for measuring the performance of agility in supply chains. Int J Manuf Techno,1: 291-318
11. Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H., (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12. Parmenter, D ,((2009. Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs, John Wiley and Sons.
13. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V.E., Chantelinc, Y.M & Lauro, c. (2005),” PLS Patch Modeling”, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48 : 159- 205.
14. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). “Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration”. MIS quarterly.
15. Wireman, T 2005, Developing performance indicators for managing maintenance, Industrial Press Inc.
16. Vazquez-Bustelo, D., Avella, L. & Fernandez, E. (2007), Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, :(27)12 1303-1332
