مفهوم‌سازی «سوژۀ مقیّد» و بازنمود آن در میان روشن‌فکران دینی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش سیاست نظری
1 - دانش‌آموخته دکتری، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: سوژۀ مقیّد, مکتب انتقادی, بازرگان, شبستری و سروش.,
چکیده مقاله :
سوژه در غرب، از شأنیتی یکسره آزاد و آگاه و مستقل و خودبنیاد به موقعیتی وابسته به ناخودآگاه، دیگری، تاریخ، سنت، ساختار، گفتمان و قدرت محدود شده و در نهایت توصیفی دیالکتیکی از آن مطرح می‌گردد. در این پژوهش، پرسش اصلی این است که در جریان روشنفکری دینی در ایران -پس از انقلاب اسلامی- سوژه، چه جایگاهی داشته است؟ فرضیۀ پژوهش این خواهد بود که در جریان روشنفکری دینی در ایران به سوژگی آدمی -آن هم سوژۀ فردی- توجّه و تأکید شده و قرائتی جدید -انسانی- از دین عرضه می‌شود که در سازگاری با اقتضائاتِ تمدن مدرن، بر محوریّتِ انسان، اراده، آزادی، حقّ انتخاب، شکوفایی، فردیّت و سوژگی است. در این مقاله برآنیم تا ضمن ارائۀ مروری تاریخی از دگرگونی‌ها در درک و برداشت از مفهوم «سوژگی» در دوران مدرن، رویکردِ روشنفکری دینی بدان، به‌ویژه در آرا و آثار مهدی بازرگان را مورد مداقه قرار دهیم. همچنین با روش توصیفی- تحلیلی و بر پایة منابع اسنادی و کتابخانه‌ای به تجزیه و تحلیل مطالب گرد‌آوری‌شده خواهیم پرداخت.
Conceptualizing the “Bound Subject” and Its Representation Among Religious Intellectuals
Majid Sarvand*
In the West, the subject has shifted from a wholly free, conscious, independent, and self-grounded entity to a position constrained by the unconscious, the other, history, tradition, structure, discourse, and power—ultimately leading to a dialectical description of it. The central question of this study is: What position has the subject occupied within the current of religious intellectualism in Iran after the Islamic Revolution? The research hypothesis is that within Iranian religious intellectualism, attention and emphasis have been placed on human subjectivity—specifically individual subjectivity—and that a new, human-centered interpretation of religion is offered which, in harmony with the requirements of modern civilization, emphasizes human centrality, will, freedom, the right to choose, flourishing, individuality, and subjectivity. This article seeks to, first, present a historical review of the transformations in the understanding and interpretation of the concept of "subjectivity" in the modern era, and then examine the approach of religious intellectualism to it, with particular focus on the thought and works of Mehdi Bazargan. Furthermore, using a descriptive-analytical method and based on documentary and library sources, the collected material will be analyzed.
Keywords: Constrained subject, Critical Theory, Bazargan, Shabestari, Soroush.
Introduction
The concept of the "subject" in the history of political and philosophical thought in the West has undergone profound and foundational transformations. If, at the dawn of modernity, the subject was recognized as a "knowing agent," a free, self-grounded, and independent being in Cartesian philosophy and Enlightenment rationality, it did not take long before various intellectual currents challenged this absolutist and individualistic conception. Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, structuralist linguistics, post-structuralist schools, and the critiques of the Frankfurt School each, in their own way, emphasized the limitations of the subject and its entanglement with social, historical, discursive, and power structures. Within this framework, the "free subject" became the "constrained subject"—an agent who, though possessing freedom, will, and individuality, is always in tension with history, structures, power, and the other.
On the other hand, in post-revolutionary Iran, the current of religious intellectualism has been one of the most important arenas in which the concept of the subject and individuality has been rethought through a religious, human-centered interpretation. Thinkers such as Mehdi Bazargan, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Abdolkarim Soroush have sought, in response to the exigencies of the modern world and intellectual transformations, to reread the relationship between religion, human beings, and freedom. From this perspective, the essential question is: What place does the subject occupy in religious intellectualism, and how can it be conceptualized within the framework of the "constrained subject"?
Significance of the Research
The importance of addressing this topic can be explained from several perspectives:
- Theoretical necessity: In modern political thought and philosophy, the subject has always been central to epistemic and social reflections and transformations. Understanding the relationship between human beings and freedom, agency, morality, and society is impossible without analyzing the subject.
- Historical necessity: In the context of post-revolutionary Iran, religious intellectualism has attempted to establish a new relationship between religious tradition and the requirements of modernity. These efforts cannot be understood without attention to the question of the subject and individuality.
- Practical-political necessity: Re-examining the concept of the subject in the thought of religious intellectuals can contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundations of democracy, citizenship rights, and popular sovereignty in contemporary Iran.
- Discursive necessity: In contrast to the official, jurisprudential-ideological reading of religion, religious intellectuals have offered an alternative interpretation that emphasizes individual experience, inner freedom, and conscious choice. Clarifying the concept of the subject can help further delineate the boundaries of this discourse.
Research Objective
The main goal of this study is to conceptualize the "constrained subject" and explain its representation among Iranian religious intellectuals. More specifically, this research aims to:
- Review the historical transformations of the concept of the subject in the West.
- Analyze the understanding of subjectivity and individuality in the thought of religious intellectuals.
- Show how these thinkers, while affirming human freedom and individuality, emphasize the subject’s connection with God, morality, and religious experience.
- Re-examine the political implications of this perspective concerning democracy, individual freedoms, and the relationship between religion and politics.
Research Questions and Hypothesis
The main research question is:
What is the position of the subject in Iranian religious intellectualism after the Islamic Revolution, and how can it be conceptualized as a "constrained subject"?
Sub-questions:
- How have transformations in Western thought influenced our understanding of the subject?
- What is the relationship between the modern subject, postmodern critiques, and the constrained subject?
- How have religious intellectuals (especially Bazargan, Shabestari, and Soroush) redefined the subject in relation to religion and modernity?
- What are the political and social implications of this perspective for understanding democracy and popular sovereignty in Iran?
The central hypothesis of this research is that in Iranian religious intellectualism, emphasis has been placed on the individual subject, freedom, agency, and human flourishing; at the same time, this subject is constrained by its relationship with God and religious experience. Thus, contrary to the jurisprudential-ideological approach that emphasizes obedience and authority, religious intellectuals have offered a human-centered and liberty-seeking interpretation of religion that is more compatible with modernity and democracy.
Findings
- Historical review: In the Western tradition, the subject has traversed a complex path from the Cartesian cogito to the critiques of Husserl, Wittgenstein, Adorno, Horkheimer, and Foucault. This path has taken the subject from being self-grounded to being deeply entangled with power and history.
- Constrained subject: This study argues that the modern human condition is a dual one; while the subject enjoys freedom and agency, it is always formed in connection with the other, tradition, history, and power. This condition may be termed the "constrained subject."
- Role of Foucault: In Foucault’s thought, the subject is simultaneously a knowing agent and an object of subjugation. He speaks of the possibility of resistance and the creation of alternative ways of living. This provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the constrained subject.
- Bazargan: In Mehdi Bazargan’s thought, the human being possesses innate dignity and inner freedom. He emphasizes individuality, agency, and personal initiative, yet ultimately holds that this freedom must be employed in the pursuit of divine elevation and spiritual perfection. Hence, he can be seen as a prominent representative of the concept of the "subject constrained by God."
- Shabestari and Soroush: These thinkers, by critiquing the official reading of religion, emphasize individual religious experience and freedom in interpreting religion. From their perspective, religion is not a set of rigid prescriptions but a spiritual experience that transforms the individual into a free subject who is nonetheless bound by ethics and faith.
- Political implications: According to this approach, democracy is the best environment for the flourishing of the subject and the realization of individuality. Popular sovereignty, individual freedoms, and citizenship rights are all grounded in the intrinsic value and dignity of the human being. In contrast, authoritarian or jurisprudential-ideological systems suppress individuality by subjugating the subject.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that the concept of the "constrained subject" can serve as a key to understanding both the freedom and limitations of human beings in the modern world. Iranian religious intellectuals, inspired by the foundations of modernity and while remaining faithful to the religious tradition, have sought to offer a new interpretation of religion in which the human being is both free and autonomous, yet finds meaning through connection with God and religious experience. Thus, the "constrained subject" is neither a passive agent crushed by power nor the absolute Cartesian subject, but a human being who continually creates and recreates themselves in the field of tension between freedom and necessity, history and faith, individuality and community. This concept can provide a theoretical foundation for rethinking the relationship between religion, politics, and democracy in contemporary Iran.
References
Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2017) Dialectic of Enlightenment (M. Farhadpour & O. Mehregan, Trans., 2nd ed.). Hermes. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1948) The infinitely smalls. In Collected Works, Vol. 14: Scientific, social, and Islamic discussions. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1955) Review of Erich Fromm’s theory. In Collected Works, Vol. 10: Comparative discussions and scientific critiques. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1956) The prophetic mission and evolution. In Collected Works, Vol. 2: Prophethood 1. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1958) The social and global Muslim. In Collected Works, Vol. 2: Prophethood 1. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1959) Man and God. In Collected Works, Vol. 2: Prophethood 1. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1961) Spontaneity. In Collected Works, Vol. 2: Prophethood 1. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1965) The endless particle. In Collected Works, Vol. 1: Fundamental discussions. Ghalam. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1967) The prophetic mission and Abraham. In Collected Works, Vol. 17: Prophethood 2. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1968) The kingdom of God. In Collected Works, Vol. 17: Prophethood 2. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1972) The afterlife and God as the goal of prophetic missions. In Collected Works, Vol. 17: Prophethood 2. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1979) Return to the Qur’an 2: Anthropology and human perspective in the Qur’an. In Collected Works, Vol. 19. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1984) The Iranian Revolution in Two Movements (4th ed.). Mazaheri Press. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1956) Definition of government from below. In Collected Works, Vol. 22: The Islamic Revolution of Iran. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1955) The path taken. In Collected Works, Vol. 1: Fundamental discussions. Ghalam. [In Persian/Farsi]
Bazargan, M. (1948) The source of independence. In Collected Works, Vol. 14: Scientific, social, and Islamic discussions. Bazargan Cultural Foundation. [In Persian/Farsi]
Descartes, R. (1993) Discourse on method. In The history of philosophy in Europe (M. A. Foroughi, Trans.). Zavar. [In Persian/Farsi]
Foucault, M. (2010) Subject and power. In Theater of philosophy (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans.). Ney. [In Persian/Farsi]
Kant, I., et al. (1997) What is Enlightenment? Theories and definitions (S. Aryanpour, Trans.). Agah. [In Persian/Farsi]
Lawrence, B. (2009) Michel Foucault. In Great Sociological Thinkers by Rob Stones (M. Mirdamadi, Trans.). Markaz. [In Persian/Farsi]
Matick, P. (1965) Humanism and socialism (V. Taghavi, Trans.). http://www.kavoshgar.org
Miller, P. (2005) Subject, domination, and power (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans., 2nd ed.). Nashr-e Ney. [In Persian/Farsi]
Mojtahed Shabestari, M. (2000a) Faith, politics, and government. In Faith and freedom. Tarh-e No. [In Persian/Farsi]
Mojtahed Shabestari, M. (2000b) Faith and freedom (3rd ed.). Tarh-e No. [In Persian/Farsi]
Mojtahed Shabestari, M. (2004a) Freedom and ethics. In Reflections on interpretation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0-yjlhQeOc
Nazari, A. (2012) Subject, power, and politics: From Machiavelli to post-Foucault. Ashian. [In Persian/Farsi]
Sabir, Z., & Shahabi, P. (2012) The relationship between subject and power in Don Quixote and Madame Bovary based on Michel Foucault’s views. Political Theory Research, 11(Spring & Summer), 181–200. [In Persian/Farsi]
Sluga, H. (1983) Subjectivity in the Tractatus (M. Sadeghi & E. Karamati, Trans.). http://tarjomaan.com/archives:5456
Spiegelberg, H. (2013) The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction (M. Aliya, Trans., Vols. 1–2, 2nd ed.). Minouye Kherad. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (1991) Islam and development– Infidelity and underdevelopment. In Heavier than ideology (8th ed.). Serat Cultural Institute. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (1996a) Interpretation of the sacred text. In Expansion of the prophetic experience (5th ed.). Serat Cultural Institute. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (1996b) Straight paths. Kiyan, 36, 2–16. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (1997a) Freedom as method. In Ethics of the Gods (4th ed.). Tarh-e No. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (1997b) Disturbed mentality, disturbed identity. In Ethics of the gods (4th ed.). Tarh-e No. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (2003a) Freedom and political power. In The etiquette of power, the etiquette of justice. Serat Cultural Institute. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (2003b) Religion and political power. In The etiquette of power, the etiquette of justice. Serat Cultural Institute. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (2008) Wisdom and livelihood (6th ed.). Serat Cultural Institute. [In Persian/Farsi]
Soroush, A. (2009) Attributes of the pious (10th ed.). Serat Cultural Institute. [In Persian/Farsi]
Vahdat, F. (2004) Iran’s intellectual encounter with modernity (M. Haghighatkhah, Trans.). Qoqnoos. [In Persian/Farsi]
Woodruff Smith, D. (2015) Husserl (S. M. T. Shakeri, Trans.). Hikmat. [In Persian/Farsi]
* Ph.D Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
majid.sarvand@gmail.com
آدورنو، تئودور و ماکس هورکهایمر (1396) دیالکتیک روشنگری، ترجمۀ مراد فرهادپور و امید مهرگان، چاپ دوم، تهران، هرمس.
اسپیگلبرگ، هربرت (1392) جنبش پدیدارشناسی (درآمدی تاریخی)، ترجمۀ مسعود علیا، ج 1 و 2، چاپ دوم، تهران، مینوی خرد.
اسلوگا، هانس (1983) سوبژکتیویته در تراکتاتوس، ترجمۀ محسن صادقی و الهه کرامتی، قابل دسترسی در: http://tarjomaan.
com/archives:5456.
بازرگان، مهدی (1327) «سرچشمه استقلال»، در: مجموعه آثار 14 (مباحث علمی، اجتماعی، اسلامی)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1328) «بی¬نهایت کوچک¬ها»، در: مجموعه آثار 14 (مباحث علمی، اجتماعی، اسلامی)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1334) «راه طی¬شده»، در مجموعه آثار 1 (مباحث بنیادین)، تهران، قلم.
----------- (1335) «تعریف حکومت از پایین» (1335)، در: مجموعه آثار 22 (انقلاب اسلامی ایران)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1338) «مسلمان اجتماعی و جهانی»، در: مجموعه آثار 2 (بعثت 1)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1339) «انسان و خدا»، در: مجموعه آثار 2 (بعثت 1)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1340) «خودجوشی»، در: مجموعه آثار 2 (بعثت 1)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1344) «ذرّۀ بی¬انتها»، در: مجموعه آثار 1 (مباحث بنیادین)، تهران، قلم.
----------- (1346) «بعثت و تکامل»، در: مجموعه آثار 2 (بعثت 1)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1355) «بررسی نظریۀ اریک فروم»، در: مجموعه آثار 10 (مباحث تطبیقی و نقدهای علمی)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1363) انقلاب ایران در دو حرکت، چاپ چهارم، تهران، چاپ مظاهری.
----------- (1366) «بعثت و ابراهیم»، در: مجموعه آثار 17 (بعثت 2)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1367) «پادشاهی خدا»، در: مجموعه آثار 17 (بعثت 2)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1372) «آخرت و خدا هدف رسالت انبیا»، در: مجموعه آثار 17 (بعثت 2)، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
----------- (1388) «بازگشت به قرآن 2» (انسان¬بینی و انسان¬شناسی قرآن)، در: مجموعه آثار 19، تهران، بنیاد فرهنگی مهندس مهدی بازرگان.
دکارت، رنه (1372) «گفتار در روش»، در: سیر حکمت در اروپا، ترجمۀ محمدعلی فروغی، تهران، زوار.
سروش، عبدالکریم (1370) «مسلمانی و آبادانی- کافری و کم¬رشدی»، در: فربه¬تر از ایدئولوژی، چاپ هشتم، تهران، مؤسسه فرهنگی صراط.
-------------- (1375الف) «آزادی چون روش»، در اخلاق خدایان، چاپ چهارم، تهران، طرح نو.
-------------- (1375ب) «ذهنیّت مشوّش، هویت مشوّش»، در: اخلاق خدایان، چاپ چهارم، تهران، طرح نو.
-------------- (1376الف) «تفسیر متین متن»، در: بسط تجربه نبوی، چاپ پنجم، تهران، مؤسسه فرهنگی صراط.
-------------- (1376ب) «صراط¬های مستقیم»، کیان، ش 36، صص 2-16.
-------------- (1382الف) «آزادی و قدرت سیاسی»، در: ادب قدرت، ادب عدالت، تهران، موسسه فرهنگی صراط.
-------------- (1382ب) «دین و قدرت سیاسی»، در: ادب قدرت، ادب عدالت، تهران، موسسه فرهنگی صراط.
-------------- (1387) حکمت و معیشت، چاپ ششم، تهران، مؤسسه فرهنگی صراط.
-------------- (1388) اوصاف پارسایان، چاپ دهم، تهران، مؤسسه فرهنگی صراط.
صابر، زینب و پرویز شهابی (1391) «نسبت سوژه و قدرت در رمان¬های دن‌کیشوت و مادام بوواری با ابتنای بر دیدگاه¬های میشل فوکو»، پژوهش سیاست نظری، شماره 11، بهار و تابستان، صص181- 200.
فوکو، میشل (1389) «سوژه و قدرت»، در: تئاتر فلسفه، ترجمۀ نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران، نشرنی.
کانت، ایمانوئل و دیگران (1376) روشنگری چیست؟ نظریه¬ها و تعریف¬ها، ترجمۀ سیروس آرین-پور، تهران، آگه.
لارنس، بارث (1388) «میشل فوکو»، در: متفکران بزرگ جامعه¬شناسی راب استونز، ترجمۀ مهرداد میردامادی، تهران، مرکز.
ماتیک، پُل (1965) «اومانیسم و سوسیالیسم»، ترجمۀ وحید تقوی، قابل دسترسی در: http://www.
kavoshgar.
org.
مجتهد شبستری، محمد (1379الف) «ایمان، سیاست و حکومت»، در: ایمان و آزادی، تهران، طرح نو.
------------------- (1379ب) ایمان و آزادی، چاپ سوم، تهران، طرح نو.
------------------- (1383الف) «آزادی و اخلاق»، در: تأمّلاتی در قرائت، قابل دسترسی در: https://www.
youtube.
com/watch?v=e0-yjlhQeOc.
میلر، پیتر (1384) سوژه، استیلا و قدرت، ترجمۀ نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، چاپ دوم، تهران، نشرنی.
نظری، اشرف (1391) سوژه، قدرت و سیاست: از ماکیاولی تا پس از فوکو، تهران، آشیان.
وحدت، فرزین (1383) رویارویی فکری ایران با مدرنیت، ترجمۀ مهدی حقیقت‌خواه، تهران، ققنوس.
وودراف اسمیت، دیوید (1394) هوسرل، ترجمۀ سید محمدتقی شاکری، تهران، حکمت.
