غریبه‌هایی پیش چشمان آشنایان (مطالعه جامعه‌شناختی کودکان کار)
محورهای موضوعی : عدالت اجتماعی، نابرابری و فقر
مهناز پیروزیان
1
,
حمیده دباغی
2
,
فرح ترکمان
3
1 - کارشناسی ارشد جامعه‌شناسی، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه مطالعات زنان، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران
3 - استادیار گروه جامعه‌شناسی، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران
کلید واژه: کودکان کار, فرهنگ فقر, تبعیض, قوانین ناکارآمد و نابرابری.,
چکیده مقاله :
در ایران، هفتاد هزار نفر کودک کار و در شهر تهران، دوازده هزار نفر مشغول به کارند و انواع تبعیضها را تجربه می‌کنند. هدف از نگارش این مقاله، بررسی وضعیت کودکان کار و چرایی شکل‌گیری پدیده کودک کار است. بنابراین مبتنی بر طرح تحقیق تلفیقی و در قالب دو بخش مطالعاتی کمّی و کیفی، ابتدا مبتنی بر روش پیمایش، 128 پرسشنامه 115 سؤالی تهیه شد که کودکان کاری که با نمونه‌گیری غیر تصادفی و هدفمند انتخاب شدند، آن را تکمیل کردند. سپس در بخش دوم با انجام هفت مصاحبه عمیق و نیمه‌ساختمند با فعالان و نخبگان اجتماعی و تحلیل تماتیک مصاحبه‌های آنها، تلاش شد تا یافته‌ها تفسیر شود. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که بیشترین کودکان کار، پسر هستند و در سنین 10-14 سال قرار دارند. اکثر آنها بی‌سوادند یا برای کمک به خانواده، به‌اجبار خانواده و نیاز مالی، ترک تحصیل کرده، کار می‌کنند. هرچند والدین اکثر آنها در قید حیات هستند، آنها بین ده تا پانزده ساعت در روز کار می‌کنند و بیشتر به دست‌فروشی مشغولند. یافته‌های بخش دوم تحقیق، بیانگر استخراج سه مقوله اصلی، هشت مقوله فرعی، ده مفهوم و 67 کد بود. مهم‌ترین یافته‌های کیفی در این مقاله نشان می‌دهد که پدیده کودک کار به‌مثابه پدیده پنهان و مغفول است که داده‌ها و اطلاعات معتبری درباره آن وجود ندارد و در فرهنگ جامعه تبعیضی چندلایه و متکثر، نهادینه شده و در قالب باورهای فرهنگی بازتولید می‌شود.
Child labor refers to children under the age of 18 who engage in various forms of work, such as street vending, workshops, agriculture, mining, manufacturing, domestic services, and other exploitative activities, to contribute to their own or their families' livelihoods. The International Labor Organization (ILO) defines child labor as work that deprives children of their childhood, potential, and dignity (ILO, 2021). Such work is harmful to their physical, mental, social, and moral well-being, limiting their educational opportunities and often leading to early school dropout. Worldwide, child labor manifests in multiple forms, ranging from agriculture and construction to waste collection and begging. These activities are often the worst forms of child labor, subjecting children to exploitation, violence, and severe risks to their well-being (UNICEF/ILO, 2021). In Iran, although precise statistics on child labor are unavailable, estimates suggest approximately 70,000 children are engaged in labor, with 12,000 to 15,000 working in the streets (Mehr News Agency, 2022). However, the actual number could be 2.5 times higher. In Tehran, it is estimated that 30,000 children work on the streets, with 20,000 working in subway stations during the winter months and 1,870 at traffic intersections. A significant majority of these children are non-Iranian, primarily from Pakistan and Afghanistan, while Iranian children represent a smaller proportion of the street-working population.
Several factors contribute to the persistence of child labor, including economic, social, family, and biological-psychological factors. Economically, high unemployment, poverty, inequality, and limited job opportunities for adults push families into situations where children must work (Bhat, 2010). Socially, positive societal attitudes toward child labor, overpopulation, unplanned migration, and a lack of protective legislation perpetuate the problem (Afshani et al., 2013). Family dynamics, such as large family sizes, parental conflicts, addiction, or criminality, often push children into labor as a means of survival. Furthermore, biological and psychological factors such as identity crises, adolescent crises, and behavioral issues like running away from home or school contribute to children entering the workforce (Okyere, 2013).
This study seeks to explore the demographic and economic characteristics of working children in Tehran, the discrimination they face at the micro and macro levels, and how policy and social changes could help reduce these inequities. The research employs several sociological frameworks to understand the systemic issues surrounding child labor. According to functionalism, social inequalities arise from roles assigned by society, each serving specific economic and social functions (Giddens, 2006). Giddens emphasizes that power dynamics and unequal access to resources lead to discrimination and inequality. Bourdieu’s theory of cultural, economic, and social capital suggests that limited access to these forms of capital among child laborers perpetuates poverty cycles and inequality (Bourdieu, 1393). Elias highlights how power relations between stronger and weaker groups contribute to inequality, with dominant groups using resource control to maintain their power (Elias & Scotson, 1965). Finally, Lewis's "culture of poverty" concept suggests that poverty is perpetuated by behaviors and beliefs resulting from poor living conditions, such as distrust in institutions and the inability to plan for the future, behaviors that are often passed down across generations (Lewis, 1966). By understanding the multifaceted nature of child labor through these theoretical lenses, the study advocates for systemic changes in legal, economic, and social structures to address the root causes of child labor and improve the lives of working children.
Keywords: Child labor, Culture of Poverty, Discrimination, Ineffective Laws, Inequality.
Methods
This study employs a mixed-methods approach. In the first phase, a researcher-designed questionnaire with 115 questions was distributed to 128 child laborers. The questionnaire had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.84, indicating its reliability. In the second phase, seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with social activists and experts, selected through purposive non-random sampling. The interview data were analyzed thematically, resulting in the identification of three main categories, eight subcategories, ten concepts, and 67 codes.
Findings
The majority of child laborers were boys aged 10 to 14. Most had dropped out of school due to financial, educational, or familial pressures and were engaged in informal jobs such as street vending. They worked 10 to 15 hours daily and often faced violence within their families. Despite most parents being alive (76.6%), financial pressures forced the children to work (79.7%). Only 1.6% of these children lived in personal or family-owned homes; 67.2% lived in rented homes, 16.4% in donated or temporary housing, and others were homeless, living in parks, streets, or workplaces.
Over 88% of these children lacked insurance, and their access to education and healthcare services was severely limited. Regarding psychological security, 31.2% of the children rated their family environment as average, while 30.5% rated it as poor. Furthermore, 65.5% reported experiencing mistreatment at home, primarily from siblings (32.9%), while 49.3% faced physical abuse and 42.3% suffered psychological abuse.
Three main themes emerged from the qualitative data:
Child labor as a hidden and neglected phenomenon: This theme includes the lack of accurate data and a comprehensive understanding of child labor, which makes effective policymaking and planning difficult.
Institutionalized discrimination against child laborers: Subcategories include inadequate laws, the perpetuation of discrimination, and discriminatory practices, all of which marginalize these children and limit their access to education and healthcare.
Eliminating child labor: This theme includes subcategories such as strategic planning, legal reforms, and multi-level policies addressing social, economic, and cultural dimensions, aimed at ensuring improved services and resources for children.
Discussion and Conclusion
The discrimination faced by child laborers is the result of a complex interplay of institutional, legislative, social, economic, and cultural factors. Effectively addressing these challenges requires comprehensive legal reforms, multi-level policymaking, and an emphasis on structural and cultural foundations to ensure the successful implementation of policies. To address the issue of child labor, it is imperative to reform and update existing laws with enforceable guarantees. Strengthening multi-level policies that tackle the intersection of economic, social, cultural, and political factors is also crucial. Moreover, expanding educational and cultural programs to raise awareness of children’s rights and promote social justice is essential. Enhancing economic conditions and ensuring a more equitable distribution of resources will help mitigate class disparities. Lastly, developing robust legal frameworks is vital to ensure that working children have access to fair and accessible judicial systems.
References
Afshani, S., Askari-Nodoushan, A., Heydari, M., & Noorian Najafabadi, M. (2013) An Analysis of the Street-Children Phenomenon in the City of Isfahan. Journal of Applied Sociology, 23(4), 85-102. ]Persian [
Barrech, S., Din, M., & Allauddin, A. (2019) Sociological Analysis of Domestic Child Labor. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1), 149-162.
Bhat, B. A. (2010) Gender, education and child labour: A sociological perspective. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(6), 323.
Bourdieu, P. (2013) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (H. Chavoshian, Trans.). Tehran: Sales Publication. (Original work published 1979).
Elias, N., & Scotson, J. (1965) The Established and the Outsiders. Social Enquiry into Community Problems. Londres, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Sage Publications, 1994, 23-29.
Giddens, A. (2006) Sociology (H. Chavoshian, Trans.). Tehran: Nei Publication. (Original work published 1989).
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2021) Child Labour: Global Estimates 2020, Trends and the Road Forward. Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/resources/child-labour-2020-global-estimates-trends-and-the-road-forward/
Lewis, O. (1966) The Culture of Poverty: Scientific American (215).
Mehr News Agency (2022) Child Labor in Iran: A Growing Concern. Retrieved from https://www.mehrnews.com ]Persian [
Okyere, S. (2013) Are working children’s rights and child labour abolition complementary or opposing realms?. International Social Work, 56(1), 80-91.
UNICEF/ILO Joint Publication (2021) Child Labour: Global Estimates 2020, Trends and the Road Forward. UNICEF & ILO.
افشانی، سیدعلیرضا و عباس عسگری ندوشن و محمد حیدری و محمد نوریان نجف آبادی (1391).
تحلیلی بر وضعیت کودکان خیابانی و کار در شهر اصفهان، جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، شماره 23، دوره 4، صص 85-102.
اقلیما، مصطفی (1388) «پدیده کودکان خیابانی»، اطلاعات سیاسی- اقتصادی، شماره 239-240، صص 142-147.
بوردیو، پی¬یر (1393) تمایز: نقد اجتماعی قضاوت‌های ذوقی، ترجمه حسن چاوشیان، تهران، ثالث.
خبرگزاری مهر (1401) «۳۰ هزار کودک خیابانی در تهران داریم»، کد خبر: 85136661 قابل دسترس در: https://www.
mehrnews.
com دلاور، علی و شیرین کوشکی (1396) روش تحقیق آمیخته، چاپ چهارم، تهران، ویرایش.
دنیای اقتصاد (1401) «آمار رسمی و غیررسمی کودکان کار در ایران چقدر است؟»، شماره روزنامه 5945، شنبه ۲۱ بهمن 1402، کد خبر: ۳۸۷۲۷۷۵، قابل دسترس در: https://donya-e-eqtesad.
com دورکیم، امیل (۱۳۶۸) قواعد روش جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه علی‌محمد کاردان، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
رکنا (1402) «چقدر کودک کار در ایران داریم؟ / از این آمار شوکه می‌شوید!»، کد خبر: 939824، لینک خبر: https://www.
rokna.
net طالبی، نادر (1389) کار کودکان و بازتولید نابرابری اجتماعی (مطالعه موردی: کودکان کار تحت پوشش جمعیت دفاع از کودکان کار و خیابان)، پایان¬نامه کارشناسی¬ارشد جامعه شناسی، استاد راهنما پرویز پیران، استاد مشاور ابراهیم توفیق، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
فولادیان، مجید و جواد طوسی‌فر و سیدحسین وزیری (1395) «روایت‌پژوهی کودک کار شدن در شهر مشهد»، مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، دوره پنجم، شماره 3 (پیاپی 19)، صص 485-510.
کوئن، بروس (1372) مبانی جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه غلام‌عباس توسلی و رضا فاضل، تهران، سمت.
گیدنز، آنتونی (1386) جامعه¬شناسی، حسن چاوشیان، تهران، نشرنی.
مقدم، محمدحسین و حسین ملتفت و عزیز حزباوی (1401) کاوشی در فرآیند شکل‌گیری پدیدۀ کودکان کار خیابانی و پیامدهای آن در شهر اهواز، مطالعات جامعه‌شناختی شهری، سال دوازدهم، شماره ۴۳، صص 193-221.
موسوی چلک، حسن (1385) «رشد روزافزون کودکان کار نگران¬کننده است»، نشریة¬ اقتصاد، شمارة 193، صص 20-21.
نارایان، دیپا (1395) توانمندسازی و کاهش فقر، ترجمه فرزام پوراصغر سنگاچین و جواد رمضانی، تهران، کریم‌خان‌زند.
نارایان، دیپا و لنت پریتچت و سمیه کاپور (1396) خروج از فقر (راه‌های بالارفتن از نردبان زندگی)، ترجمه دکتر جعفر خیرخواهان، تهران، کریم‌خان زند.
Barrech, S. Din, M. & Allauddin, A. (2019) Sociological Analysis Of Domestic Child Labor. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies 19(1):149-162.
Bhat, B.A. (2010) Gender, education and child labour: A sociological perspective. Educational Research and Reviews Vol. 5 (6), pp. 323-328, Available online at: http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR2 ISSN 1990-3839 © 2010 Academic Journals.
Child Labour: Global estimates (2020) trends and the road forward. UNICEF/ILO joint publication. 2021: https://data.unicef.org/resources/child-labour-2020-global-estimates-trends-and-the-road-forward/.
Doftori, M.R. (2004) Education And Child Labour In Developing Countries. A Study on the Role of Non-Governmental Organisations in Bangladesh and Nepal.
Elias, N., & Scotson, J. L. (1965) *The Established and the Outsiders*, SAGE Publications.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, J. (2006) How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability, SAGE Journals, 59-82.
ILO.(2021) CHILD LABOUR, International Child Labour. Unicef. Available in: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@ipec/documents/publication/wcms_797515.pdf.
Kumar , A. & Chandrashekhar (2013) A Sociological Study On Child Labors And Welfare Programs In Karnataka (Special Reference To Davanagere Dist). International Journal Of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences.
Lewis, O. (1966) The Culture of Poverty. Scientific American, 215(4), 19–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24931078.
Okyere, S. (2013) Are working children’s rights and child labour abolition complementary or opposing realms? International Social Work 56(1):80-91.
Rahman, M. M. (2023) Sample Size Determination for Survey Research and Non-Probability Sampling Techniques: A Review and Set of Recommendations. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 11(1), 42–62.
