طراحی الگوی برنامه‌های توسعه توانمندی‌های اعضای هیات علمی مبتنی بر فاوا
محورهای موضوعی : فناوری¬های نوین و شبکه¬های اجتماعی و توسعه منابع انسانی
عاطفه غلامی
1
,
احمدرضا نصر اصفهانی
2
,
اعظم اسفیجانی
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری برنامه ریزی درسی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان. اصفهان، ایران.
2 - استاد گروه برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: طراحی مدل, عناصر, بهسازی, اعضای هیئت علمی, فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات,
چکیده مقاله :
توسعه و بالندگی اعضای هیات علمی با هدف پاسخگویی به نیازهای چالش برانگیز جامعه، دانشگاه، اعضای هیات علمی و دانشجو در حال تبدیل به حوزه‌ای غنی است. در این راستا به کارگیری فناوری می‌تواند فرصت‌های جدیدی را در این حوزه ایجاد کند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی عناصر و طراحی الگوی برنامه‌های توسعه توانمندی‌های اعضای هیات علمی مبتنی بر فاوا انجام شده است. روش پژوهش از نوع کاربردی و با رویکرد جمع آوری و تحلیل کیفی بوده است که با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی قیاسی و استقرایی به انجام رسیده است. شیوه، مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته با تعداد بیست نفر از متخصصان حوزه آموزش و فناوری با شیوه گلوله برفی و تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری بوده است. یافته‌های پژوهش ۶ مفهوم اصلی و ۴۲ مقوله‌ی فرعی شناسایی کرده است. نتایج پژوهش بر طراحی عناصر شش گانه هدف، محتوا، زمان، فضا، تعاملات و ارزیابی، با توجه به قابلیت‌ها و چالش‌های افزودن فاوا به این عناصر تاکید دارد. در نهایت الگوی طراحی برنامه‌های توسعه توانمندی‌های اعضای هیات علمی مبتنی بر فاوا ترسیم شده است. توصیه نهایی بر طراحی سامانه یکپارچه شامل سیستم‌های متنوع آموزشی و پژوهشی مبتنی بر نیازهای فردی و سازمانی، رویکردهای فعال، تجربی، شخصی سازی، غیر رسمی و قابل انتقال به عمل در محیطی امن، منطبق با قوانین با توجه به شبیه سازی موقعیت‌های حضوری در زمانی منعطف و بهینه، با تعاملات فعال مخاطب، مربی و محتوا با رویکرد شفاف و انتخابی به همراه ارزیابی رشد دهنده و معتبر است.
Recently there have been a focus on the development of faculty members with the aim of meeting the challenging needs of society, university, faculty members and students. In this regard, technology includes the potential to create new opportunities in this field. The current research was conducted with the purpose of identifying the elements and designing a model for the development programs for faculty members based on FAVA. The research method was applied and with the approach of qualitative data collection and analysis, which was done with the comparative, inductive, and qualitative content analysis method. The method involved semi-structured interviews with 20 experts in the field of education and technology with a snowball method until theoretical saturation was reached. According to the findings 6 main concepts and 42 subcategories were extracted. The research results emphasize the design of the 6 elements of goal, content, time, space, interactions and evaluation, considering the capacities and challenges of adding FAVA to these elements. Finally, a pattern of programs was presented based on FAVA for developing the capacities of faculty members. In addition, some recommendations were offered based on the findings of the study such as designing an integrated system including various educational and research systems based on individual and organizational needs; active, experimental, personalization, informal and transferable approaches in a safe environment in accordance with the rules; considering simulation of face-to-face situations in a flexible and optimal time with active interaction of the audience, instructor and content with a clear and selective approach along with a growing and valid assessment.
1. Forgie SE, Yonge O, Luth R. Centres for teaching and learning across Canada: What’s going on? Can J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2018;9(1):1–20.
2. Kamel A. Role of faculty development programs in improving teaching and learning. Saudi J Oral Sci [Internet]. 2016;3(2):61. Available from: http://www.saudijos.org/text.asp?2016/3/2/61/188073
3. Hasanzade S, Salehi omran E. Promoting quality of human resources training in higher education with emphasis on social capital development. Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2016;3(10):23–50.
4. Baker L, Leslie K, Panisko D, Walsh A, Wong A, Stubbs B, et al. Exploring Faculty Developers’ Experiences to Inform Our Understanding of Competence in Faculty Development. Acad Med. 2018;93(2):265–73.
5. Bilal, Guraya SY, Chen S. The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty’s knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Biol Sci [Internet]. 2019 May;26(4):688–97. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1319562X17302723
6. O’Meara KA, Rivera M, Kuvaeva A, Corrigan K. Faculty learning matters: Organizational conditions and contexts that shape faculty learning. Innov High Educ. 2017;42(4):355–76.
7. Sirianni G, Glover Takahashi S, Myers J. Taking stock of what is known about faculty development in competency-based medical education: A scoping review paper. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):909–15.
8. Kay J. G, Douglas LR. A guide to faculty development (jossey-bass higher and adult education). Second Edi. Vol. (0). United States of America: Jossey-Bass; 2010. 464 p.
9. Zaresefat S, Dehghani M, Hakimzadeh R, Karami M, Salehi K. Null curricula for the professional development of faculty members of iranian universities: Ferdowsi University, Iran. J High Educ Curric Stud. 2018;9(17):183–216.
10. Jamali Zavareh B, Nasr Isfahani A, Nili MR. A comparative study on the missions and methods of training in professional development centers in the world top universities. Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2019;19(5):151–73.
11. Hilty DM, Yager J, Seritan AL, Levine R, DeJong SM, Borus J. A historical review of key events and components of faculty and professional development in psychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am [Internet]. 2019 Sep;42(3):357–73. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0193953X19300425
12. Welch M, Plaxton-moore S. Faculty development for advancing community engagement in higher education: current trends and future directions. J High Educ Outreach Engagem. 2017;21(2):131–66.
13. Kalbasi A, Nasr A. Investigating the necessity of creating new educational centers at our universities. High Educ Lett [Internet]. 2011;4(13):9–28. Available from: http://journal.sanjesh.org/article_15440.html?lang=en
14. Aalami F, Khorasani A, Kamali H, Shiroodi A. Analysis of human resource management performance in identifying and meeting the needs of professional development of faculty members (case study: Shahid Beheshti University). Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2020;6(22):66–92.
15. Nili Ahmadabadi M, Davarpanah S, Yadollahi Dehcheshmeh A. Developing and validating the scale of professional development of faculty members in teaching, learning and research. High Educ Lett. 2019;12(46):7–39.
16. Safari S. The role of faculty development on social capital in distance education context (case: Payame Noor University). Q J Iran Distance Educ. 2018;
17. Soltani pereshkafti N, Jaafari P, Ghourchian N, Bagheri M. The model for the development of faculty members of Payame Noor University based on informal learning using the foundation data theory. (Payame Noor University of Hormozgan). J New Approaches Educ Adm. 2020;10(4):312–42.
18. Mohebzadegan Y, Pardakhtchi MH, Ghahramani M, Farasatkhah M. Developing a model for faculty development based on grounded theory approach. Res Plan High Educ. 2014;19(4):1–25.
19. SeyyedHatami S, Namvar Y, Soleimani T, ZahedBabolan A. A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of university faculty members. IRPHE. 2018;24(4):99–121.
20. Herman JH. Faculty development programs: The frequency and variety of professional development programs available to online instructors. J Asynchronous Learn Netw. 2012;16(5):87–106.
21. Scarpena K, Riley M, Keathley M. Creating successful professional development activities for online faculty: A reorganized framework. Online J Distance Learn Adm. 2018;21(1):1–8.
22. Berry S. Professional development for online faculty: instructors’ perspectives on cultivating technical, pedagogical and content knowledge in a distance program. Vol. 31, Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2019. p. 121–36.
23. Li K-C, Wong BT-M. The professional development needs for the use of educational technology. Interact Technol Smart Educ [Internet]. 2019 Jun 17;16(2):159–71. Available from: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0089
24. Lotti A. Brief history of faculty development for medical education in united states. Breve storia del faculty development in medicina negli stati uniti. tutor. 2020;20(1):6–16.
25. Ramsay CM, Robert J, Sparrow J. Promoting Pedagogical Agility in Learning Spaces: Toward a Comprehensive Framework of Faculty Support and Innovation. J Teach Learn with Technol [Internet]. 2019 Aug 6;8(1):60–75. Available from: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/26747
26. Mahdavinasab Y, Sadipour E, Moradi M. An investigation of the effective components considered in designing e-learning environments in higher education and offering a framework for e-learning instructional design. Vol. 1, Quarterly Journal of Iranian Distance Education (IDEJ). 2019. p. 9–24.
27. Mehrmohammadi M. Curriculum: theories, approaches and perspectives. 2nd ed. Tehran: SAMT; 2016. 1–652 p.
28. Pelletreau KN, Knight JK, Lemons PP, McCourt JS, Merrill JE, Nehm RH, et al. A faculty professional development model that improves student learning, encourages active-learning instructional practices, and works for faculty at multiple institutions. Ledbetter ML, editor. CBE—Life Sci Educ [Internet]. 2018 Jun;17(2):1–17. Available from: https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0260
29. Childs E, Remein CD, Bhasin RM, Harris AC, Day A, Sullivan LM, et al. How to launch and continually enhance an effective medical campus faculty development program: Steps for implementation and lessons learned. J Healthc Leadersh. 2021;13:147–56.
30. Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barnett BM, Centeno A, Naismith L, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Med Teach [Internet]. 2016 Aug 2;38(8):769–86. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851
31. Bandali B, Abolghasemi M, Pardakhtchi M, Rezaeizadeh M. Studying the challenges of faculty development programs at Shahid Beheshti University. Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2019;18(5):25–54.
32. Mirahmadi K, Khorasani A, Nazarpour M taghi, Shams Murkani G. Pathology of human resource training system in higher education: codification and validation of a model. Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2021;8(28):1–25.
33. Salajegheh M, Norouzi A. Designing the comprehensive educational faculty development program in Kerman university of medical sciences based on Kern planning model. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2021;18(1):1–6.
34. Mohabbat H, Vajargah KF, Jaafari P. Identifying the model and designing the competencies of the faculty members of universities and higher education institutions of iran: a qualitative study. Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2019;6(21):67–91.
35. Maleki M, Alizadeh M, Pezeshki A, Mafinezhad M. Development and implementation of faculty development programs: barriers and solutions based on the literature - Royesh in Medical Education. royesh [Internet]. 2022;14(23):35–44. Available from: https://royesh.tums.ac.ir/article-1-67-en.html
36. Rahimi S, Khorasani A, Rezaeizadeh M. Identify the results and functions of Web 2.0 tools in staff development (higher and continuing education). Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2020;6(23):1–22.
37. Ehteshami MR, Golzari Z, Fathi Vernosfadrani L. Identifying the components of professional development courses for Farhangian University professors with a flipped learning approach: a qualitative study. J Islam Life J centeredon Heal. 2020;4(1):179–95.
38. Im JH, Kim JW, Park WB, Han I, Lee SH, Shin JS, et al. Is it feasible and effective to provide faculty development programs online for clinical teachers? Korean J Med Educ. 2021;33(2):139–45.
39. Cook DA, Steinert Y. Online learning for faculty development: A review of the literature. Med Teach [Internet]. 2013 Nov 5;35(11):930–7. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2013.827328
40. Bakhtyari A, Farajollahi M, Sarmadi M, Zarabian F. Design and validation of faculty member’s cognitive empowerment model in blended learning environments. Educ Strateg Med Sci [Internet]. 2019;11(5):122–30. Available from: http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203
41. Jaafari far Z, Khorasani A, Rezaeizadeh M. Identifying and ranking teachers’ barriers in a virtual human resource development environment. Q J Train Dev Hum Resour. 2017;4(12):53–77.
42. Parker C, Sam S, Alistai G. Snowball sampling [Internet]. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2019. 1–14 p. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/foundations
43. Tabrizi M. Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of analogical and inductive approaches. Soc Sci. 2014;21(64):105–38.
44. James Jacob W, Xiong W, Ye H. Professional development programmes at world-class universities. Palgrave Commun [Internet]. 2015 Dec 27;1(1):1–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/
45. De Rijdt C, Stes A, van der Vleuten C, Dochy F. Influencing variables and moderators of transfer of learning to the workplace within the area of staff development in higher education: Research review. Educ Res Rev [Internet]. 2013 Jan;8:48–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.007
46. Webb AS, Wong TJ, Hubball HT. Professional Development for Adjunct Teaching Faculty in a Research-Intensive University: Engagement in Scholarly Approaches to Teaching and Learning. Int J Teach Learn High Educ [Internet]. 2013;25(2):231–8. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1016541
47. Frantz AC, Beebe SA, Horvath VS, Canales J, Swee DE. 5: The Roles of Teaching and Learning Centers. To Improv Acad. 2004;23(1):72–90.
48. Ahmady S, KAjeh jashoghani M, Mohammadimehr M. Explaining the expectations and views of the faculty members in relation to the educationa development centers. Res Med Educ. 2019;11(3):39–48.
49. Ghashghaeizadeh N. Designing and development model for improving the quality of work life of faculty members. Iran Occup Heal. 2020;17(1):1–12.
50. Torkzade J, Mohammadi M, Salimi G, Forough BM. Academic empowerment with a strategic approach: a situational framework for planning the development of Bamiyan University, Afghanistan. J Educ Plan Stud. 2017;6(11):133–57.
51. Day T, Tosey P. Beyond SMART? A new framework for goal setting. Curric J [Internet]. 2011 Dec;22(4):515–34. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585176.2011.627213
52. Etezadrazavi M, Parvaneh R, Mohamad hoseinzadeh M. Programs with High priority for EDC in Mashhad University of medical sciences (in accordance with documents of transformation and innovation medical education). Horiz Med Educ Dev. 2016;6(2):36–8.
53. Rahmani N, Ezati M. Affecting factors on empowerment of faculty members from the islamic perspective. Manag Islam Univ. 2015;3(8):263–84.
54. Keshmiri F. Short-term faculty development program: a path way to improve teaching skills and transfer knowledge of faculty members to educational context. Horiz Med Educ Dev. 2021;12(1):62–72.
55. Holt D, Palmer S, Challis D. Changing perspectives: teaching and learning centres’ strategic contributions to academic development in Australian higher education. Int J Acad Dev [Internet]. 2011 Mar;16(1):5–17. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1360144X.2011.546211
56. Austin AE, Sorcinelli MD. The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Dir Teach Learn [Internet]. 2013 Mar;2013(133):85–97. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tl.20048
57. Sidikova SD. Theoretical and didactic principles of distance learning. Acad an Int Multidiscip Res J. 2021;11(1):541–8.
58. McNeil JD. Contemporary curriculum: In thought and action. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. 1–336 p.
59. Doll J, Maio A, Potthoff M. Epic failure: Lessons learned from interprofessional faculty development. Perspect Med Educ [Internet]. 2018 Dec 13;7(6):408–11. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40037-018-0488-8
60. Huang Y, Han X, Wang Y. Learning “B-Learning” through “B-Learning”: A Practice Model for Teachers’ Professional Development. In: 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) [Internet]. IEEE; 2017. p. 41–6. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8308503/
61. Entezarian N, Fatahi R. Basics of user interface design based on knowing the characteristics, perception and behavior of users. Libr Inf Sci. 1389;13(2):9–29.
62. Sharghi A, Mahdinejad J, Nadoomi R. Comparative comparison of sense of place in real and virtual places. Interdiscip Stud Media Cult. 2019;9(1):157–77.
63. López-Belmonte J, Pozo-Sánchez S, Moreno-Guerrero A-J, Lampropoulos G. Metaverse in Education: a systematic review. Rev Educ a Distancia [Internet]. 2023 Jan 31;23(73). Available from: https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/511421
64. Dinneen P. How a flexible teaching “Camp” answered our pandemic teaching emergency. To Improv Acad [Internet]. 2021 Mar 25;39(3). Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.17063888.0039.307
65. Lehman RM, Conceição SCO. Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: how to “be there” for distance learners. Esfijani A, Khodabandelu R, Khazai A, editors. Isfahan: Isfahan University Publications; 2016. 1–120 p.
66. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS. Ensuring quality assurance of the faculty development programs in medical education using the Kirkpatrick model of evaluation. Med J Babylon. 2022;18(4):439.
67. van den Akker J. Curriculum Perspectives: An Introduction. In: Curriculum Landscapes and Trends [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2004. p. 1–10. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_1
68. Seraji F, Attaran M, Naderi E, Aliasgari M. Designing the curriculum of the virtual university. J Curric Stud. 2007;6(2):79–118.
