درآمدی بر مکالمه‌کاوی سازمانی: مطالعه‌ای میان رشته‌ای
محورهای موضوعی :
1 - استادیار گروه زبانشناسی، دانشگاه جهرم
کلید واژه: مکالمه کاوی سازمانی, هویت سازمانی, منزلت, قدرت, جنسیت.,
چکیده مقاله :
مكالمه كاوي يكي از شاخه‌هاي تحليل گفتمان است که مورد توجه بسیاری رشته‌ها از جمله روانشناسی، جامعه‌شناسی و زبانشناسی است. از اواخر دهه 1970، مكالمه كاوان بر مكالماتی که در محيط‌هاي خاصي اتفاق مي‌افتد، تمركز كرده‌اند و رشته مکالمه کاوی سازمانی به وجود آمده است که طرفداران زیادی پیدا کرده و جهت بررسی مطالعه هویت سازمانی، منزلت، قدرت و جنسیت بسیار مفید واقع شده است. سهم این مطالعات در زبان فارسی بسیار اندک است. در این مقاله سعی بر آن است که مکالمه کاوی سازمانی و زوایای آن معرفی گردد. سپس برای نمونه چند مکالمه دانشگاهی به عنوان مکالمه سازمانی با تاکید بر جنسیت افراد مورد واکاوی قرار می گیرد. نتایج این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که هویت سازمانی، وجهه، جنسیت و قدرت در شرایط کنونی جامعه از پیش تعیین شده و مطابق کلیشه های پیشین نیست بلکه لحظه به لحظه در تعامل شکل می گیرد.
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 4 (2): 132-58.
Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Beattie, G. (1981): Interruption in conversational interaction and its relation to
the sex and status of the interactants. Linguistics 19: 15-35.
Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Caplan, P. J. (1994). Lifting a Ton of Feathers. A Woman's Guide to Surviving in the Academic World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Eakins, B & Eakins, G. (1979). Verbal turn-takings and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In B. Duboia, & I. Crouch, (eds.). The Sociology of the Languages of the American Women. San Antonio: Trinity University.
Edelskey, C. (1981). Who's Got the Floor? Language in Society 10: 383-421.
Fillmore, Ch. (1994). Humor in academic discourse. In A. D. Grimshaw (ed.). What's Going On Here? Complementary Studies of Professional Talk. pp. 271-310. Norwood, NJ: Academic Press.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall.
Goffman, E. (1967): Interaction Ritual: Essays on Pace-to-face Behavior. New York: Pantheon.
Goodwin, M. H. (1997). Towards families of stories in context. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1-4): 107–12.
Grimshaw, A.D. (1989). Collegial Discourse: Professional Conversation among Peers. Norwood: Ablex.
Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analyzing data. In D. Silverman (ed.). Qualitative Analysis: Issues of Theory and Method, pp. 222-245. London: Sage.
Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. Fitch & R. Sanders, (eds.). Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, pp. 103-147. Lawrence: Erlbaum.
Holmes, J. (1990). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Longman.
Holmes, J. (1992). Women's talk in public contexts. Discourse & Society 3(2): 131-50.
Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156–77.
Holmes, J. (2006). Gendered Talk at Work. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Hoey, M. (2000). Persuasive rhetoric in linguistics: a stylistic study of some features of the language of Noam Chomsky. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, pp. 28-37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kotthoff, H. (2000). Gender and joking. On the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 55–80.
Kotthoff, H. (2006). Gender and humor: The state of the art. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 4–25.
Ladegaard, H. J. (2011). Doing power at work: responding to male and female management styles in a global business corporation. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (1): 4–19.
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mullany, L. (2007). Genderd Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Mumby, D. K. & Stohl, C. (1991). Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse and Society 2 (3): 313-32.
Partington, A. (2006). The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus-assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. London: Routledge.
Rees-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1087-1111.
Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. A.& Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking system for communication. Language 50: 696–735.
Simpson, P. & Mayr, A. (2010). Language and Power: a Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Swales, J. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversational Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
Wenger, E. (1992). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
West, C. (1998). When the Doctor is a 'Lady': Power, Status and Gender in Physician-Patient Encounters. In: J. Coates, (ed.). Language and Gender: A Reader, pp. 396-412. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R. (2003). Multiple identities: the roles of female parliamentarians in the EU parliament. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.). The Hanbook of Language and Gender. pp.671-98. Oxford: Blackwell.
