رابطه اخلاق وظيفه گرا و اهداف پيشرفت: نقش واسطه اي منبع کنترل
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی
1 - بخش روان شناسی تربیتی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 - بخش روان شناسی تربیتی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
کلید واژه: اخلاق وظيفه گرا, اهداف پيشرفت, منبع کنترل,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعيين رابطه اخلاق وظيفه گرا و اهداف پيشرفت با واسطه گري منبع کنترل به انجام رسيده است. اين پژوهش به روش توصيفي- همبستگي انجام گرفت. جامعه آماري پژوهش شامل دانشجويان مقطع کارشناسي دانشگاه شيراز بودند؛ که از آن ميان 440 دانشجو (221 دختر) و (219 پسر) به شيوه نمونه گيري تصادفي خوشه اي چند مرحله اي انتخاب شدند؛ و به پرسشنامه هاي اخلاق وظيفه گرا، منبع کنترل و اهداف پيشرفت پاسخ دادند. جهت پاسخگويي به فرضيه هاي پژوهش از تحليل مسير در مدل يابي معادلات ساختاري استفاده گرديد. نتايج نشان داد که اگرچه وظيفه شناسي و معتمد بودن با هر سه هدف پيشرفت عملکردگرايي، تبحرگرايي و تبحرگريزي رابطه مثبت و معني دار دارند؛ امّا با هدف عملکردگرايي ميزان رابطه بيشتر است. همچنين نتايج نشان داد که منبع کنترل مي تواند در رابطه بين اخلاق وظيفه گرا و اهداف پيشرفت واسطه گري کند. از ديگر نتايج اين پژوهش مي توان به رابطه معني دار منبع کنترل دروني و بيروني با هر سه هدف پيشرفت حاضر در پژوهش اشاره کرد. نتايج اين پژوهش به توسعه دانش نظري در مورد نقش پيشايندي منش هاي اخلاقي و منبع کنترل در رابطه با اهداف پيشرفت کمک شاياني مي کند. همچنين به لحاظ کاربردي، تلويح نتايج پژوهش آن است که با آموزش منش هاي اخلاقي وظيفه شناسي و معتمد بودن و بازآموزي اسنادي (منبع کنترل) مي توان به رشد اهداف پيشرفت مناسب کمک نمود.
This study aims to examine the relationship between moral conscientiousness and goals of progress with source-mediated control. This research was a descriptive-correlational study. The statistical population of the study consisted of undergraduate students of Shiraz University, from which 440 students (221 girls) and (219 boys) were selected through multistage cluster random sampling. They responded to task-oriented ethics questionnaires, locus of control, and goals of progress. To respond to the research hypotheses, path analysis was used in structural equation modeling. The results showed that although conscientious and trustworthy with all three achievement goals performance approach, mastery approach & mastery avoidance Have a positive and significant relationship; But with performance approach the relationship is greater. The results also showed that locus of control can mediate the relationship between moral conscientiousness and achievement goal. The results of this study contribute to the development of theoretical knowledge about the antecedent role of moral conscientiousness and locus of control in relation Achievement goal. Also, in practical terms, the implication of the research results is that by moral character, conscientious, and trustworthy (locus of control) can help develop appropriate development goals.
خرمائی، فرهاد و قائمی، مریم. (1397). بررسی ویژگی های روانسنجی پرسشنامه منش های اخلاقی. بخش روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز. منتشر نشده.
میرز، لاورنساس؛ گامست، گُلن و گارینو، جی. (2006/1396). پژوهش چند متغیری کاربردی (طرح و تفسیر). ترجمه حسن پاشا شریفی، ولی اله فرزاد، سیمین دخت رضاخانی، حمیدرضا حسن آبادی، بلال ایزانلو و مجتبی حبیبی. تهران: رشد.
Albert, M. A., & Dahling, J. J. (2016). Learning goal orientation and locus of control interact to predict academic self-concept and academic performance in college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 245-248.
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom goals, structure, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Bishara, S., Kaplan, S. (2018). The relationship of locus of control and meta cognitive knowledge of math with math achievements. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 65 (6), 631-648.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
Can, S., Durukan, E. (2019). The level of pedagogical formation students academic locus of control. International journal of evalution and research in education, 8 (3), 531-536.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290.
Cohen, T. R., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal Personality and Social Psychology. 107, 943-963.
Duckworth, A. L., Milkman, K. L., Laibson, D. (2018). Beyond willpower: Strategies for reducing failures of self – control. Association for Psychological Science, 19 (3), 102-129.
Duman, G., & Eren, A. (2014). Prospective teachers achievement goals, Learning strategies and engagement in lessons: a mediation analysis. Kastamonu journal of education. 23 (3), 1047-1064.
Dweck, C. S., & Legget, E. L. (1998). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychology Review, 95, 256-273.
Elliot, A. J., Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). A social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2×2 achievement goals framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 666-679.
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Education Psychology. 103 (3), 632-648.
Elliot, A., & Church, M. A. (1997). hierarchical modal of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 72, 218-232.
Fillip, I., Saheba, N., Wick, B., & Radfar, A. (2016). Morality and ethical theories in the context of human behavior. Morality and Ethical Theories, 32, 83-87.
Funder, D. C., & Fast, L. A. (2010). Personality in social psychology. In S T Fisk, D T. Gilbert and Lindzey (Eds). Handbook of social psychology. 5th ed , New York: Wiley.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychologica Methods, 3 (4), 424–453.
Janosevic, M., & Petrovic, B. (2018). Effects of personality traits and social status on academic achievement: Gender differences. Psychology in the schools, 497-509.
Karaman, M. A., Watson, J. C. (2017). Examining associations among achievement motivation, locus of control, academic stress and life satisfaction: A comparison of U. S. and international undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 106-110.
Kim, Y., & Cohen, T. R. (2015). Moral character and workplace deviance: recent research and current trends. Current opinion in Psychology, 6, 134-138.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Levenson, H. (1972). Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control: Development of a new scale. American Psychological Association. available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1972-25012-001
Levenson, H., & Miller, J. (1976). Multidimensional health locus of control in sociopolitical activists of conservative and liberal ideologies. Personality and Social Psychology, 33 (2), 199-208.
Li, J., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. E. (2015). Locus of control and cell phone use: Implications for sleep quality, academic performance and subjective well-being. Computer in Human Behavior, 52, 450-457.
Lin, X., Su, S., McLwain, A. (2019). Academic stressors as predictors of achievement goal orientation of American ESL international student. Journal of international students. 9 (4), 1134-1154.
Lodewyk, K. R. (2019). Relations between trait personality, goal orientation and adaptive outcomes in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38 (3), 207-213.
Longley, S. L., Miller, S. A., Broman-Fulks, J., Calamari, J. E., Holm-Denoma, J. M., & Meyers, K. (2017). Taxometric analyses of higher-order personality domains. Personality & Individual Differences, 108, 207–219.
Mc Cabe, K. O., Van Yperen, N. W., Elliot, A. J., & Verbraak, M. (2013). Big five personality profiles of context-specific achievement goals. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 698-707.
Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., Retelsdorf, J., & Koller, O. (2019). The relationship of personality traits and different measures of domain – specific achievement in upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 45-59.
Nowiki, S. (2016). A manual for the Nowicki – Strickland internal – external control scale. Atlanta, GA: Emory.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotion: Testing model of their joint relation with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology. 101, 115-135.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Ramezani, S. G., & Gholtash, A. (2015). The relationship between happiness, self-control and locus of control. International Journal Psychological Researches, 1 (2), 100-104.
Sawalhah, A. M., & Zoubi, A. A. (2020). The relationship academic self-regulation with self-esteem and goal orientation among university students in jordan. International education studies. 13 (1), 111-122.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual review of clinical psychology. 15, 1-23.
Soric, I., Penezic, Z., & Buric, I. (2017). The Big five personality traits, goal orientation, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 126-134.
Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65 (3), 213-243.
Uztemur, S. (2020). Achievement goal and learning approaches in the context of social studies theaching: Comparative analysis 3 × 2 and 2 × 2 model. Participatory educational research. 7 (2), 1-18.
Van Daal, T., Donche, V., & Maeyer, S. (2013). The impact of personality goal orientation and self-efficacy on participation of high school teachers in learning activities in the workplace.Vocations and Learning, 7, 21-40.
Waters, L., Loton, D., & Jach, H. (2019). Does strength – based parenting predict academic achievement? The mediating effects of perseverance and engagement. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20 (4), 1121-1141.
Wong, D. B. (2006). Natural moralities: A defense of pluralistic relativism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zhou, M., Adesope, O. O., Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2019). Relation of multivariate goal profile to motivation epistemic beliefs and achievement. Journal of pacific rim psychology. 13. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2018.28
