List of Articles Theoretical Foundations

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - A review of the most important views and theoretical foundations of Althusser
  Masoud  Jahanbani Maryam   Azizi Abdul Rasool  Abbasi Nasrabad Sofla
  In this article, we aim to evaluate the most important ideas and theoretical foundations of Althusser's social theory. In this article, the data were collected using various documents, books and articles and then analyzed. Althusser's structural Marxism has expanded in More

  In this article, we aim to evaluate the most important ideas and theoretical foundations of Althusser's social theory. In this article, the data were collected using various documents, books and articles and then analyzed. Althusser's structural Marxism has expanded in response to two interpretations of Marx, and his re-reading. Althusser first opposed and criticized the approach of orthodox Marxism; The second approach criticized by Althusser is Hegelian Marxism and the Frankfurt Circle. He tried to warn Marxist theory from both the determinism of economics and the humanistic approach of Lukچcs and the Frankfurt Circle. Althusser's attempts to escape the reductionism of Marxist theory were somewhat successful; But Althusser's rotation was more paradigmatic, and did not essentially save Marxist theory from fundamental limitations in the fields of ontology, epistemology, anthropology, and methodology. Althusser's intellectual roots are influenced by Hegel and Marx, and he has benefited greatly from linguistics. According to the classical classification, Althusser is one of those who believe in the originality of the collective, and says that ideology has a material existence. Althusser places more emphasis on theoretical research than on practical and empirical research, He believes that social organization is made up of three elements: politics, economics, and ideology. Althusser believes in the multidimensional determination of the three levels, but in the final analysis he considers economics to be the determining factor. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Critique of Montgomery Watt's theoretical foundations and assumptions about the revelation of the Qur'an and the Prophet (PBUH)
  fatemeh javadiyan asl Abdorreza Farhadian Fatemeh  Khalili
  Every science has principles and foundations. Quranic scholars are aware of the fact that understanding the Quran requires certain principles, and ignoring them will lead to misunderstandings. By comparing and criticizing the opinions of thinkers in the field of Quranic More

  Every science has principles and foundations. Quranic scholars are aware of the fact that understanding the Quran requires certain principles, and ignoring them will lead to misunderstandings. By comparing and criticizing the opinions of thinkers in the field of Quranic research, it is possible to achieve the growth and expansion of Quranic studies and to recognize the greatness of revelation. Based on the theoretical foundations of Muslims, revelation is the divine word. Revelation has a divine origin and is far from controversy, contradiction and distortion. According to the theoretical foundations of Orientalists such as "Montgomery Watt", the revelation did not have a divine origin and was made by the Prophet, who took it from the holy books of the Covenants and was a genius who wrote the Qur'an and influenced others according to his environment and time. Is. In examining this view, it should be said that there is no valid historical evidence on these claims. Applying the theoretical foundations and personal assumptions of the researcher in areas in which he does not have sufficient scientific mastery leads the wrong path of research. In this research, by criticizing Watt's views on revelation and prophecy, he has criticized and studied it, and by citing reliable sources, he has correctly answered the doubts and cleared the Qur'an of these deviations. Manuscript profile