• Home
  • شهادت زور
    • List of Articles شهادت زور

      • Open Access Article

        1 - A comparative study of preventive approaches to giving false testimony from the perspective of ethics, Imami jurisprudence and Iranian and Egyptian law
        Seyyed Mohammad  Ebrahimi Mohammad Rasul  Ahangaran Seyyed Abolghasem  Naghibi
        Testimony as a tool and one of the common arguments in proving a claim, has an important place in Imami jurisprudence and Iranian and Egyptian law. Therefore, in order to prevent it from the plague of hypocrisy, it is necessary to take measures in the two a priori and p More
        Testimony as a tool and one of the common arguments in proving a claim, has an important place in Imami jurisprudence and Iranian and Egyptian law. Therefore, in order to prevent it from the plague of hypocrisy, it is necessary to take measures in the two a priori and pre-occurrence areas, ie not to commit the crime of coercion and the posterior area, and after the occurrence of the crime, ie the treatment area.In this article, in the field of a priori and action, the approaches of ethics and justice in jurisprudence and law of Iran and Egypt are examined and he believes that paying attention to justice in the witness as an internal police is an element preventing the commission of martyrdom and using a moral guarantee factor. It is considered as force in preventing martyrdom. In the field of retroactive and reactionary measures, while dealing with various punishments, the use of the punishment of tashhir, which is one of the characteristics of jurisprudence, has been specified as a basic and main measure to prevent the recurrence of the crime of forced martyrdom. Community Verified icon. Manuscript profile