List of Articles sovereignty

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Modern State, National Army, and Conscription
  Vhid sinaee
  National armies, and conscription are institutions that established by nation-state. Because the state’s claim on exclusive dominatation over and the legitimate use of force in a specific territory required formation of military institutions, i.e. national army, and co More

  National armies, and conscription are institutions that established by nation-state. Because the state’s claim on exclusive dominatation over and the legitimate use of force in a specific territory required formation of military institutions, i.e. national army, and conscription. This link was established through the legal- theoretical foundations of the state, i.e. national sovereignty, and nationalism. In this context, nation served as a source of human forces to military organizations, and conscription, which in turn helped strengthen and stabilize the modern state. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - The Relationship between the Concept of Judgment in Christian Theology and the Theory of Modern Sovereignty
  kamyar safaei Saiedalireza Hosseinibeheshti
  The concept of "sovereignty" is one of the key concepts of modern political philosophy. This concept, systematically explained for the first time in the modern age by Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes, implies the meanings like absolute and legitimate power over the legislat More

  The concept of "sovereignty" is one of the key concepts of modern political philosophy. This concept, systematically explained for the first time in the modern age by Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes, implies the meanings like absolute and legitimate power over the legislation process. The prevailing attitude in political thought, due to the very pioneering of Bodin and Hobbes in explaining the meaning of sovereignty, views this concept as an innovative concept which is discovered in the modern age. This article tries to demonstrate, however, the concept of sovereignty is raised from Christian theology and one of its main topics: The concept of "judgement". Therefore, the systematization of the term "sovereignty" by Bodin and Hobbes never means that they invented this concept as a wholly modern one. For this purpose, this article searches for the meaning of the term "judgement" in the Old Testament and the New Testament, and, on the basis of the prominent commentaries of the Scriptures, seeks to show that this concept has three relatively distinct but intertwined meanings. These three meanings are "Legislation", "Judgement in legal and judicial sense" and "Sovereignty", all of which accords with the features of the notion of sovereignty in the modern sense of the word. Consequently, it can be said that, the formation of modern sovereignty has not happened in discontinuity with Christian theology, but in continuity with it. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Analyzing the Neoplatonic/Christian origins of the formation of human sovereignty in the Renaissance era
  kamyar safaei Saiedalireza Hosseinibeheshti
  The main topic of this research is to find the roots of human sovereignty in the age of the Renaissance, especially in the thoughts of Marsilio Ficino and Pico dellaMirandola who are two great neo-Platonist thinkers of this period. The two basic concepts that have been More

  The main topic of this research is to find the roots of human sovereignty in the age of the Renaissance, especially in the thoughts of Marsilio Ficino and Pico dellaMirandola who are two great neo-Platonist thinkers of this period. The two basic concepts that have been discussed here to illustrate the transfer of the right of sovereignty from God to Men are the concepts of Judgment and Hierarchy. From these two concepts, the judgment has derived from Christian theology and the hierarchy has derived from the neo-Platonic philosophy. We choose the concept of hierarchy because these two thinkers, in their main works, firstly describe the hierarchy of existence, and then, in opposition to the former neo-Platonists, they liberate man from that and give him the freedom to move in ascending or descending directions in that hierarchy. Therefore, the discussion of the concept of hierarchy and its theoretical development from Plotinus to Dionysius is necessary, to be able to speak of the liberation of Man from the hierarchy of existence in the thought of Ficino and Miranda. But it is necessary to address the theological concept of judgment because Mirandola states that a person can reach the position of one of the heavenly angels, namely "Tron", which is a symbol of divine judgment. For this reason, we searched for the meaning of the term Judgment, in the Old Testament and the New Testament, and showed that this term has three meaningsin the Scriptures: legislation, judgment in the legal sense, and sovereignty, and therefore We showed that Mirandola's notion of Judgment, accords with the third meaning of the term Judgment in Scriptures which is sovereignty. Accordingly, one can say that Man's possessing of the right to judge, in the thought of Ficino and Mirandola, which arises from his liberation from the hierarchy of existence and his access to the position of Throne means that he will have the right of Sovereignty. Therefore, the right to judge which now means sovereignty and previously belongs to God and through his grace, to Christ and God's saints, is thus transmitted to Man. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - The economic rights of coastal countries in different maritime areas In the shadow of moral teachings
  maryam shamoni Ahwazi mansour atashene basem mavali zadeh
  Governance is one of the most fundamental concepts related to the formation and sustainability of the state-state, which gives the legitimate and objective faculties of the government of that country. This concept defines the scope of the authority of the political syst More

  Governance is one of the most fundamental concepts related to the formation and sustainability of the state-state, which gives the legitimate and objective faculties of the government of that country. This concept defines the scope of the authority of the political system and governing institutions within the country and in foreign relations. In addition to the political borders of the land, the sovereignty of the countries has come at the blue borders. In marine environments, coastal countries are qualified after considering the economic bases of the maritime zones. In this regard, one of the roots of the disagreements arises here from which developed countries want to dominate economic zones and limit the domination of governments The coast was around the waters around you. On the other hand, colonized and developing countries are demanding more seaweed for economic protection from their land areas. In this study, the purpose of this study was to examine the economic rights of coastal countries in different marine areas. And then collect information using the library method and phishing. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  5 - The place of ethics in property with a focus on the rule of domination and public sovereignty
  zahra sarhaddi Seyed Mohammad Mehdi  Ghamami Tavakol  Habibzadeh
  he special place of property in the daily life of human beings is of special importance and prominence among other issues, so much so that in the divine schools and even non-divine systems, it is a fundamental and certain principle for regulating the social and economic More

  he special place of property in the daily life of human beings is of special importance and prominence among other issues, so much so that in the divine schools and even non-divine systems, it is a fundamental and certain principle for regulating the social and economic relations of society. It is the most famous jurisprudential rule and has long been one of the most basic rules of Islamic jurisprudence due to its extensive economic and social application. This rule establishes the pillars of ownership in conflict with the subject of ownership and the rule of domination with the public interest. Most believe that the principle of preference for public rights and collective interests It restricts the scope of domination and is in conflict with these two public interests. However, some views in the rule of domination refer to the collective and do not infer conflict with the public interest. The present study focuses on ownership based on the rule of domination and the rule of public interest The growing complexity of people's lives and social relationships, which limit the rule of domination in conflict with the public interest and even deprivation of property, has been processed so that no one has entered as above. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  6 - The basis of philosophy of contract realization
  jalil ghanavati omid gholamalitabar firozjaiee
  Basically, the philosophy of contract realization is based on two theories: a view based on formalism and the restraints of the words and specific forms for conclusion of the contract, and the other is based on the freedom of will in concluding the contract. However, af More

  Basically, the philosophy of contract realization is based on two theories: a view based on formalism and the restraints of the words and specific forms for conclusion of the contract, and the other is based on the freedom of will in concluding the contract. However, after the Renaissance, intense oppositions to formality began and the sovereignty of will has grown steadily, and this transformation and attitude has also become more objective in the legal system of Iran after the constitutional revolution, but after a while a lot of criticism, philosophically or legally, appeared regarding it and its severity and intensity has been reduced. In Iran's law, by setting Article 10 of the Civil Code as well as Article 957, the legislator has shown tendency to the principle of sovereignty of will, but this does not mean that we interpret the traditional and jurisprudential texts according to modern interpretations. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  7 - The dialectic of justice and public order And the synthesis of citizenship rights
  Hamid  Talebzadeh
  Citizenship rights as a set of rights defined as a citizen in the sense of an obedient and influential pillar of political society vis-دولت-vis the government in terms of the Indo relationship in terms of citizenship and ultimately the equality of all members of society More

  Citizenship rights as a set of rights defined as a citizen in the sense of an obedient and influential pillar of political society vis-دولت-vis the government in terms of the Indo relationship in terms of citizenship and ultimately the equality of all members of society before the law And the individual specifically participates in the concepts of justice and public order, which by analyzing these concepts, it seems that citizenship rights are presented as manifestations and examples of a concept of justice that is in conflict with social systems related to public order. , The aims and quality of the design of these issues confirm the above statements. Of course, in terms of relativity in all three concepts of justice, public order and civil rights, as in other concepts of humanities, it is impossible to emphasize the above assumption, but in terms of relatively acceptable definitions of these concepts will confirm this. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  8 - EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: Challenges and Obstacles
  Yasser Nooralivand Mohammad Reza Majidi
  By investigating the security-political divide within the European Union despite the economic integration, the article suggests structural, internal and external challenges are preventing the EU to echo one voice in international level. The most important challenge in a More

  By investigating the security-political divide within the European Union despite the economic integration, the article suggests structural, internal and external challenges are preventing the EU to echo one voice in international level. The most important challenge in achieving the Common Foreign and Security Policy is Member States’ insistence on national structures such as national sovereignty and nation interests. In maintaining national structures on supra-national level, European Union is suspended between two different structure: confederate and federal. The indeterminate and fluid structure manifests itself in process of decision-making across different policy-making arenas. Achieving EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy is prevented by contradiction between the national approach (encompassing national sovereignty and national sovereignty) and the supra-national approach (limiting national sovereignty and compromising national interest for sake of common interest).This article tries to analyze the issue that why EU notwithstanding in the field political and security convergence in the international arena? Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  9 - EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: Challenges and Obstacles
  Mohammad Reza Majidi Yasser Nooralivand
  By investigating the security-political divide within the European Union despite the economic integration, the article suggests structural, internal and external challenges are preventing the EU to echo one voice in international level. The most important challenge in a More

  By investigating the security-political divide within the European Union despite the economic integration, the article suggests structural, internal and external challenges are preventing the EU to echo one voice in international level. The most important challenge in achieving the Common Foreign and Security Policy is Member States’ insistence on national structures such as national sovereignty and nation interests. In maintaining national structures on supra-national level, European Union is suspended between two different structure: confederate and federal. The indeterminate and fluid structure manifests itself in process of decision-making across different policy-making arenas. Achieving EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy is prevented by contradiction between the national approach (encompassing national sovereignty and national sovereignty) and the supra-national approach (limiting national sovereignty and compromising national interest for sake of common interest).This article tries to analyze the issue that why EU notwithstanding in the field political and security convergence in the international arena? Manuscript profile