مراد

List of Articles مراد

Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
1 - Disciple relationship and meaning in asrar nameh and elahe nameh
Mansour Nik Panah

Attar and mysticism two strings are woven together for the development of both the other groups. In fact, the evolution and development of the Persian mystic Attar through mysticism, particularly through the efforts of Attar's poetry. Henchman place and meaning in the w More

Attar and mysticism two strings are woven together for the development of both the other groups. In fact, the evolution and development of the Persian mystic Attar through mysticism, particularly through the efforts of Attar's poetry. Henchman place and meaning in the works of Attar and the type of interaction and dialogue were the encapsulation of a strong manifestation of his works. Therefore, in this article we are going to work in a divine meaning and purpose Asrarnamh to Attar's view of the status of our deal and how discerning disciple Guidance. What is certain though narrative anecdotes and quotes the poet can be flexible in this regard affect. In this regard, the tables have tried to show how this relationship. In total, thanks to a narrative that is both visible effect of the differences between the two poles of mysticism in these two indices achieved. Finally, the distinctions of the attitude expressed in the above worksy. Manuscript profile
Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
2 - The Bibliography of Houshang Moradi Kermani’s Works
Farshad Eskandari Sharafi Ali Bazvand

Houshang Moradi Kermani is a well-known writer and stylist in Iran who has had a profound effect on flourishing modern juvenile literature producing an abundant of unique works. Indeed, he tries to depict juvenile world, their issues and concerns in life. The current st More

Houshang Moradi Kermani is a well-known writer and stylist in Iran who has had a profound effect on flourishing modern juvenile literature producing an abundant of unique works. Indeed, he tries to depict juvenile world, their issues and concerns in life. The current study, which is a kind of descriptive-analytic ones applying library sources, aims to both present a brief biography of this writer and investigate his works in juvenile literature comprehensively. The findings reveal that he has produced 8 story collections, 10 novels, 1 autobiography, 3 plays, 3 scenarios, and 3 literary messages during his five decades of writing and literary activity. Most of these works are translated into different languages including German, English, French, Arabic, Chinese, etc. winning various national and international rewards. Besides, there are various movies, TV series, and animations produced based on his scenarios. In terms of different age range for juveniles, his works are appropriate for age groups “D”, “H”, “G” and “B” respectively. Moreover, adults can sometimes be the audience of his works. “Majid Stories” is the most well-known work in juvenile literature due to being broadcasted on TV and radio and published several times as books. Having the highest number of translation versions and winning international rewards, “khomre” is the wolrd’s most famous Iranian work in juvenile literature. Manuscript profile
Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
3 - Effective policies on cultural economic structures with a community-oriented development approach (case study, Islamabad Karaj neighborhood)
محمّد¬تقی¬ حیدری Sima Kazemi

Mohammad Taghi Heydari Sima Kazemi Lemraski Abstract The increasing growth of urbanization and the lack of coherent urban management have led to the inefficiency of planning in cities, so that this inefficiency is more visible at the small "neighborhood" level. More

Mohammad Taghi Heydari Sima Kazemi Lemraski Abstract The increasing growth of urbanization and the lack of coherent urban management have led to the inefficiency of planning in cities, so that this inefficiency is more visible at the small "neighborhood" level. In general, the community-based approach in urban development and planning can increase people's control over their own lives and livelihoods, and ultimately lead to the presentation of plans and programs that are more consistent with local needs and conditions. In the science of cultural economics, the economic fields and Websters needed in a cultural category are discussed. Determining the correct policies in the field and sectors of the economy of culture is one of the most important and key factors in its development. In this regard, in the present research; Effective policies in cultural economy in Moradab-Karaj neighborhood (Islam-Abad) have been compiled with a neighborhood-based approach with a descriptive-analytical method based on documentary and survey sources. First, we will examine and explain the nature of the cultural economy and the role of creative industries and effective policies on the cultural economy, and finally, strategic-executive solutions are presented in order to achieve the development of the neighborhood. The data used in this research is a combined method (quantitative and qualitative). Data analysis has been done according to the analytical descriptive method and according to theoretical inferences. The statistical community of this research is made up of experts and experts in the field of urban planning and some of them are native people of the neighborhood. In order to get a deeper understanding of issues and problems, especially social and economic characteristics, information was collected using a survey method and a questionnaire tool. After the comments and answers were counted, the content analysis method was used, and in particular, the software (MAXQDA) was used, through which the data of the answers to the interviews and questionnaires were summarized and coded. The results show that the neighborhood council and city-management can contribute to the ecological, economic, social, political and cultural sustainability of the neighborhood in the direction of sustainable neighborhood development by fundamentally changing the neighborhood's planning structures. Finally, it can be said that coherent neighborhood management plays a significant role in shaping the neighborhood and maintaining the economic structure of the neighborhood as well as creative industries. Manuscript profile
Open Access Article
- Abstract Page
- Full-Text
4 - Metadiscourse, Interactional Metadiscourse, Interactive Metadiscourse, Houshang Moradi Kermani, Literary Genre.
Sanaz Deghat Mohammad Hossein ُُُُSharafzadeh Leila Saberi Zahra Rastegar Haghighi Shirazi

 The present research analyzes the metadiscourse markers in the works of Houshang Moradi Kermani, one of the prominent authors of children and young adult literature.It examines the trend of changes in these markers over the period from 1971 to 2021.This study, based on Hyland's (2005) model of metadiscourse, investigates the interactional and interactive metadiscourse markers in Moradi Kermani's works over five decades.The research method is descriptive-analytical, and the data were extracted using the AntConc software.Statistical analysis of the data using Kendall's test shows that over time, the use of interactional metadiscourse elements in Kermani's works has increased, while interactive elements have decreased.This trend indicates the author's effort to strengthen the connection with the reader and personalize literary texts over time.The results of this study can contribute to a better understanding of the rhetorical changes in children's and young adults' literature and show how authors in this field adapt their writing style to cultural and social changes.   Introduction   The oldest and most valuable text in which metadiscourse markers can be studied is the works of Houshang Moradi Kermani.Metadiscourse arises from the need to establish more effective communication between the author and the reader, and as such, it has become one of the important elements in text analysis.In these works, metadiscourse markers are a clear indication of how the author uses linguistic and rhetorical tools to strengthen their connection with readers and effectively convey their ideas.This research aims to answer the question of how historical and cultural changes in Moradi Kermani's works have affected the distribution and function of metadiscourse elements and how these changes have contributed to the reader-friendliness of his texts.Examining this issue can provide a new model of the author's interaction with the reader and the role of metadiscourse in improving the quality of communication in children and adolescents' literature.This research hypothesizes that Moradi Kermani's works, through the intelligent use of metadiscourse, have succeeded in creating a deeper and more effective connection with the audience.       Literature Review   Hyland and Jiang (2018) conducted a historical study on the markers of interactive and oppositional metadiscourse over fifty years in the top journals of four disciplines and found that there has been a significant increase in the frequency of oppositional metadiscourse markers and a noticeable decrease in the distribution of interactive metadiscourse markers over these fifty years in the journals.The markers of oppositional metadiscourse aim to organize and define the boundaries of the text to ensure that readers can more easily retrieve and understand the author's interpretations and objectives in the scientific discourse, and authors of scientific texts use these markers to guide their audience.   Rezaei Keramati et al. (2019) conducted a study on the markers of interactive metadiscourse in three leading journals of applied linguistics.To analyze the historical evolution of stance and engagement markers, the subcategories of interactive metadiscourse in different sections of research articles (introduction, methodology, discussion, and conclusion) were examined using Hyland's (2005b) model.The findings indicate a significant decrease in the frequency of interactive metadiscourse markers in all sections of the articles.This decrease is generally related to the reduction of stance markers in the conclusion and methodology sections.As previously mentioned, the scope of this research pertains to the analysis of scientific texts (research articles) and does not include literary genres or stories.   Bagheri (2020) conducted a study on the historical evolution of interactive and oppositional metadiscourse markers in doctoral dissertations in the fields of hard sciences and soft sciences over three time periods: 1966, 1986, and 2016, based on Hyland's (2005) theory.The findings show that interactive metadiscourse (stance and engagement) has decreased in soft sciences and increased in hard sciences.This indicates that in soft sciences, academic writing is moving towards neutrality, impartiality, and greater responsibility towards the reader, i.e., more reader-oriented and less persuasive, and in hard sciences, scientific discourse is moving towards greater persuasiveness and reader-friendliness.This research also focuses on scientific discourse (doctoral dissertations) and does not include literary genres or stories.   Liu and Yang (2021) conducted a study based on Hyland's model to examine interactive and oppositional metadiscourse in 240 research articles in hard sciences (mechanical engineering and physics) and soft sciences (education and history) over sixty years.They found that metadiscourse markers have generally shown a declining trend over time.This has been accompanied by a noticeable increase in oppositional markers and a significant decrease in interactive markers, indicating that authors in scientific texts tend to use more oppositional metadiscourse and less interactive metadiscourse over time to write clearer and more convincing texts and adopt a more objective and scientific approach.This study, like previous research, pertains to the analysis of research articles and scientific texts.       Theoretical Framework   The term metadiscourse was first introduced by Harris (1959), referring to the author's or speaker's efforts to ensure the audience's understanding of the spoken text.Metadiscourse serves as an important tool for facilitating communication, supporting the author's position, and engaging the reader (see Hyland, 2015).To analyze the metadiscourse elements in the scope of this research, Hyland's (2005) theory was used because his classification is new, clear, and comprehensive (see Abdi et al., 2010).As shown in Table 1, this theory has two dimensions: interactional and interactive.       Table 1 - Subcategories of Interactional and   interactive Metadiscourse       <div align="center"> <table class="MsoNormalTable" dir="rtl" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-yfti-tbllook: 1184; mso-padding-alt: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-table-dir: bidi; mso-border-insideh: .5pt solid windowtext; mso-border-insidev: .5pt solid windowtext;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tbody> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 0; mso-yfti-firstrow: yes;"> <td style="width: 235.5pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" colspan="2" width="314"> Metadiscourse </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 1;"> <td style="width: 114.35pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="152"> Interactional </td> <td style="width: 121.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-right-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="162"> Interactive </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 2;"> <td style="width: 114.35pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="152"> Attributes </td> <td style="width: 121.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-right-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="162"> Stance markers </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 3;"> <td style="width: 114.35pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="152"> Hedges </td> <td style="width: 121.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-right-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="162"> Endophoric markers </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 4;"> <td style="width: 114.35pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="152"> Boosters </td> <td style="width: 121.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-right-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="162"> Frame markers </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 5;"> <td style="width: 114.35pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="152"> Engagement markers </td> <td style="width: 121.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-right-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="162"> Evidentials </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 6; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes;"> <td style="width: 114.35pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="152"> Self-mentions </td> <td style="width: 121.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-right-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="162"> Transitions </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div>       Markers of interactive metadiscourse are used to organize the information present in the text and guide the reader through it.On the other hand, markers of interactional metadiscourse are used to engage with the reader and involve them in the text (see Hyland, 2005).Each of the subcategories of interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers, briefly displayed in Table 2, has its specific function.       Table 2 - Hyland's (2005) Theory   <div align="center"> <table class="MsoNormalTable" style="margin-left: 53.15pt; border-collapse: collapse; mso-table-layout-alt: fixed; border: none; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-yfti-tbllook: 1184; mso-padding-alt: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-border-insideh: .5pt solid windowtext; mso-border-insidev: .5pt solid windowtext;" border="1" width="459" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tbody> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 0; mso-yfti-firstrow: yes;"> <td style="width: 95.05pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="127"> Types of Metadiscourse </td> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Classification </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Function </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> Example </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 1;"> <td style="width: 95.05pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" rowspan="5" width="127"> Interactional metadiscourse Establishing an effective connection with the reader </td> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Attitude markers </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Author's attitude towards the text </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> Agree, very important, with surprise </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 2;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Self-mentions </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Explicit reference to the author's presence </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> Author, I, we, researcher </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 3;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Engagement markers </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Addressing the reader explicitly </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> You, pay attention, assume </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 4;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Boosters </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Indicating the speaker's degree of certainty about the statement </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> Without a doubt, certainly, clearly </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 5;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Hedges </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Indicating the author's doubt about the statement </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> Perhaps, almost, probably </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 6;"> <td style="width: 95.05pt; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" rowspan="5" width="127"> Interactive metadiscourseOrganizing information in a sentence and guiding the reader through the text   </td> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Transitions </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Connecting the sentences of the text </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> But, moreover, therefore </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 7;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Frame markers </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Defining the boundaries of the text and providing a framework for elements </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> First, second, as a result </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 8;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Endophoric markers </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Referring the reader to other parts of the text </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> In the next section, below </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 9;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Evidentials </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Referring to information provided in other texts and attribution </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> According to, as stated, as said </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 10; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes;"> <td style="width: 82.15pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="110"> Code glosses </td> <td style="width: 88.75pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="118"> Providing further explanation about the meaning </td> <td style="width: 78.4pt; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-left-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="105"> First, second, as a result </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div>       Data Analysis   The data analysis revealed that in Houshang Moradi Kermani's children's and young adult literature from 1971 to 2021, the use of interactive metadiscourse markers increased while the use of interactional metadiscourse markers decreased.Interactive metadiscourse, which indicates the author's explicit presence and engagement with the audience, was increasingly employed over time, particularly through self-mentions and engagement markers.On the other hand, interactional markers like transitions, which help manage the flow of information in the text, were used less frequently.These changes suggest that Moradi Kermani gradually developed a stronger inclination toward creating a more personal and effective connection with his readers.       Conclusion   In this research, the role of metadiscourse in the works of Houshang Moradi Kermani in the field of children and young adult literature was examined.The results showed that Moradi Kermani extensively used metadiscourse markers, especially interactional markers, to establish an effective connection with his audience.The use of these markers has increased over time, while interactive markers have decreased.This tendency to use more interactional markers indicates the author's effort to engage the readers and create a more personal connection with them.   These findings contrast with the results of previous research in scientific discourse, which has moved towards less use of interactional metadiscourse and more use of interactive metadiscourse.       Keywords: Metadiscourse, Interactional Metadiscourse, Interactive Metadiscourse, Houshang Moradi Kermani, Literary Genre.       References   Abdi, R., Tavangar, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2010) “The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse”.Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1669-1679.   Aghayari, K. (1994) Introduction to children's and young adult literature.Tehran: Mahya.   ---------------- (1996) Introduction to children's and young adult literature and criteria for book critique and review.Tehran: Saramad Kavosh.   Ahangari, S.& Kazemi, M. (2014) “A Content Analysis of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ Regarding Metadiscourse Elements”.International Journal of Applied Linguistics and 76 IJALEL 8 (3): 66-77 English Literature.3 (3) 10-18.https: //doi.org/10.7575/ aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.10   Aljazrawi, D.A., &Aljazrawi Z, A.(2019) “The use of metadiscourse: an analysis of interactive and interactional markers in English short stories as a type of literary genre”.International journal of applied linguistics and English literature, 8 (3), 66.   Amouzadeh Khalili, F. (2002) A descriptive dictionary of young adult fictional characters (Vol.2) Tehran: Aftabgardan.   Anthony, L. (2011) AntConc 4.2.0.<a href="http://www.Laurenceanthony.net/software.html">http: //www.Laurenceanthony.net/software.html</a>   Bagheri, F.(2020) A Diachronic Study of Metadiscourse in Doctoral Dissertations (Doctoral dissertation, Wuhan University (People's Republic of China)).   Deng, L., Fatemeh, B., & Gao, X.(2021) “Exploring the interactive and interactional metadiscourse in doctoral dissertation writing: A diachronic study”.Scientometrics, 126 (8), 7223-7250.   Gillaerts, P.(2014) Shifting metadiscourse: Looking for diachrony in the abstract genre.In M.Bondi & R.Lores Sanz (Eds.), Abstract in academic discourse: Variation and change (pp.271-286) Switzerland: Peter Lang.   Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F.(2010) “Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts”.Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 128-139.   Harris, Z.(1959) The transformational Model of language structure.Anthropological Linguistics.1: 1.27-29.   Hyland, K. (2004) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.   -------------- (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction, London, Continuum.   -------------- (2005b) stance and engagement: A MODEL OF interaction in academic discourse, discourse studies, 7 (2), PP. 173-192.   ------------ (2015) Metadiscourse.In Tracy, K.(ed) International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.   Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2016) Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance.Written Communication, 33 (3), 251-274.   ---------------------------- (2018) “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse.English for Specific Purposes, 51, PP. 18-30.   Hyland, K., & Tse, P.(2004) Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal.Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), 156-177.   Khani, R., & Changizi, M. (2016) Comparison of metadiscourse markers in international and domestic English journals (Case study: Articles in applied linguistics), Language Research (Humanities), 8(18), PP. 77-102.   Kouhi, D., & Mojoud, M. (2012) A contrastive study of metadiscourse in Persian and English newspaper editorials.Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 5(10), 137-162.   Liu, G., & Yang, Y.(2021, May) A Diachronic Study of Multi-Disciplinary Metadiscourse in Research Articles.In 2021 the 6th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp.121-132).   Merati, A.(2009) Examining the position of national and religious identity in children's and young adult poetry [Unpublished master's thesis].Payame Noor University of Qazvin.   Moradi Kermani, H. (1979) Majid's stories.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (1980) The carpet weaving house children.Tehran, Moein.   ------------------------ (1982) The palm tree.Tehran: Sahab.   ------------------------ (1989) The jar.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (1992) Fist on skin.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ 1994) The oven.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (1996) Mom's guest.Tehran: Ney.   ------------------------ (1998) Sweet jam.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (1999) Pomegranate's smile.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (2003a) Like a full moon.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (2003b) Neither wet nor dry.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (2007) Rice and stew.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (2009) Soft pillow.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (2012) Water reservoir.Tehran: Moein.   ------------------------ (2019) Teaspoon.Tehran: Moein.   Mostafavi, M.& Tajalli, G.(2012) Metadiscoursal Markers in Medical and Literary Texts.International Journal of English Linguistics.2 (3) 64.   Rezaei Keramati, S., Kuhi, D., & Saeidi, M.(2019) Cross-sectional diachronic corpus analysis of stance and engagement markers in three leading journals of applied linguistics.Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 6 (2), 1-25.   Soltani, R., & Shokrpour, N.(2021) The status of metadiscourse markers use in Iranian medical articles: A comparative study.Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 31(196), 92-100.           Manuscript profile

List of Articles مراد

Rimag

Links

Related Centers

Technical Support

Official pages