The Role of Effective factors in Growth of New Technology Based Firms (NTBFs) in Mashhad City
Subject Areas : Generalfateme sanaei pour 1 , davood ghoroneh 2
1 -
2 - Ferdosi University
Keywords: Incubators, Technology, Facilities & Services, New Technology Based Firms (NTBF's).,
Abstract :
The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of facilities of incubators in growth of new technology based firms (NTBF's). Statistical population is the NTBF's located on incubators and technology parks in Mashhad city. Data collecting tools is questionnaire made by the researcher. For data analysis, correlation and stepwise regression were used. The results showed that an increase in facilities of incubators, NTBF's will be more growth oriented. There is a significant and positive correlation between the facilities of incubators and growth of NTBF's (r=.871). As well as, all components of incubators (establishment in the center, advice provided, benefits of being in the center and services and facilities of the existing infrastructure) with the growth of new technology-based firms (growth in sales, employment and profitability) have a significant positive relationship. The results of stepwise regression analysis show that components of establishment, advice provided, benefits of being in the center and the services and facilities of the existing infrastructure in the incubators, together jointly explained 0.914 of the variance of performance
1. آقاجانی، حسنعلی و طالب نژاد، عاطفه (1390). ارزیابی مقایسهای عملکرد مراکز رشد فناوری منتخب در ایران، فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی،4 (13)، صص165-149.
2. تاری، مهدیه، مرادی، محمود و ابراهیمپور، مصطفی (1394)، بررسی عوامل موثر بر رشد و موفقیت شرکتهای دانش بنیان، فصلنامه رشد فناوری،(45)12 ،44-36.
3. ثامهاین، هانس (1387). مدیریت فناوري در سازمان هاي فناوري بنیان. ترجمه سید کامران باقري، مرتضی رضاپور و سید هادي کمال. چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات رسا.
4. ثقفی, فاطمه, حدادی, جواد. (1397). ارائه مدل سنجش تاثیر خدمات پارکهای علم و فناوری بر عملکرد نوآورانه شرکتهای دانشبنیان مستقر در آنها. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری،(3)6، 127-101
5. انصاری، رضا، جعفری بنه عیسی، زهرا، و کرمپور، علی(1395). الگوی ساختاری ظرفیت جذب دانش و نوآوری در شرکتهای دانش بنیان مورد مطالعه : شرکتهای مستقر در مراکز رشد دانشگاههای آزاد استان اصفهان. فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزشآفرینی، ۵ (۹) :۴۷-۶۲ .
6. حبیبی،روزبه،اصغری،زهرا،جعفری،کامران.(1397)شناسایی و اولویتبندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه مراکز رشد واحدهای فناور دانشگاه (مورد مطالعه: مرکز رشد واحدهای فناور دانشگاه گیلان)، فصلنامه رشد فناوری،(56)14. 9-1.
7. حسینی، سید محمد رضا و بنادکوکی، دهقان (1389). گزارش پایش فضاي کسب و کار خرداد ماه سال 1389 ، مرکز پژوهش هاي مجلس شوراي اسلامی، شماره 10305.
8. خالدی،آرمان،الهی،شعبان، مجیدپور،مهدی و اسدی فرد،رضا.(1397). نیروهای تسهیل کننده و بازدارنده همکاری های فناورانه بین شرکتهای بزرگ و شرکتهای کوچک فناوری محور. فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، (13)7، 104-79.
9. خیاطیان محمدصادق، طباطبائیان سید حبیب اله، امیری مقصود، الیاسی مهدی(1393). تحلیلی بر عوامل موثر بر رشد و پایداری شرکت های دانش بنیان در ایران. فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، (۶ و ۶)3، صص 74-57.
10. دلاور، علي (1382). مباني نظري و عملي پژوهش در علوم انساني و اجتماعي. تهران: رشد.
11. رحمانپوری محمد، شفیعی مسعود، بهادری مرتضی. (1391). بررسی موانع و راهکارهای ارتباط صنعت و دانشگاه (مورد کاوی شرکت توزیع نیروی برق تهران بزرگ)، فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی ، (1)1،صص 18-5.
12. سازمان توسعه صنعتی ملل متحد(UNIDO) (1384). استراتژی افزایش مشارکت موثر و رقابتی بخش صنایع کوچک و متوسط در توسعه صنعتی و اقتصادی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. ترجمه عبدالرضا شقاقی و مسعود شفیعی. تهران: انتشارات رسا.
13. سرمد، زهره، بازرگان، عباس و حجازي،الهه (1385). روشهاي تحقيق در علوم رفتاري. چاپ دوازدهم. تهران: نشرآگاه.
14. شریف زاده، فتاح ، کریمی طرارانی، محبوبه ، سیدنقوی، میرعلی ، حسین پور، داود .(1397). الگوی خط مشیگذاری پارکهای علم و فناوری و شرکتهای دانش بنیان در نظام نوآوری. فصلنامة نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، سال هفتم، شمارة سیزدهم، صص54-40.
15. غلامی،دنیا،رمضانی ،علی. (1397). شناسایی و تحلیل اصلیترین مؤلفههای راهبردی تأثیرگذار در عدم موفقیت شرکتهای دانشبنیان در ایران (مطالعه موردی: پارک علم و فناوری کرمانشاه)، فصلنامه رشد فناوری، (57)15. 84-77
16. موتمنی، علیرضا، حسین آبادی، محمد و همتی، امین(1391). ارزیابی نرخ موفقیت واحدهای فناور مستقر در پارکها و مراکز رشد علم و فناوری. فصلنامه رشد فناوری، 8(32)، صص 40-32.
17. نصر, علی, حاجی حسینی, حجت اله. (1396). نقش پارک های علم و فناوری در توسعه نوآوری و فناوری. فصلنامه رهیافت , (65)27, ، صص49-37.
18. نعمتی محمد علی(1392). مؤلفه های مؤثر بر مدیریت موفق مراکز رشد علم و فناوری کشور. فصلنامه آموزش عالی ایران. (1)5، 186-165
19. هومن، حيدر علي( 1373 ). پايه هاي پژوهش در علوم رفتاري. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
20. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 909–924.
21. Bollinger, L., Hope, K. & Utterback, J. M. (1983). A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms.Research Policy, 12, 1-14.
22. Boudlaie,H.(2020)."Studying the content characteristics of New Technology-Based Firms," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol.3(1), pages 94-111.
23. Brierley, P. (2001). The Financing of Technology-based Small Firms: A Review of the Literature.Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin.41 (1), 64-76. 24. Butchart, R. I. (1987). A new UK definition of the high technology industries.Economic Trends.40, 82-88.
25. Cahen, F. R., Borini, F. M. & Lahiri, S. (2016). Managerial perceptions of barriers to internationalization: An examination of Brazil's new technology-based firms. Journal of Business Research, 69(6),1973–1979.
26. Campos, H. M, Aguirre, I., Parellada. F. & Parra, J. P. N. (2009). Technology Strategy and New Technology Based Firms.Journal of Technology Management and Innovation. 4(4), 42-52.
27. Cassinenga, H. J. & Georghiou ,L. (2005). Foresight in Innovation Policy: Shared Visions for a Science Park and Business–University Links in a City Region. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.Vol. 17.
28. Chamanski, A. J. & Waago, S. (2000). The Organizational Success of New, Technology-Base Firms.Stavanger University College,1-73.
29. Colombo, M. G. & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing. 25(6), 610-626.
30. Colombo, M. G., Giannangeli, S. & Grilli, L. (2013) .Public Subsidies and the Employment Growth of High-tech Start-ups: Assessing the Impact of Selective and Automatic Support Schemes. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(5), 1273-1314.
31. Cooper A. C. (1971). The founding of technologically-Based Firms. Milwaukee: The Center for Venture Management.
32. Cunha D., Silva, S. & Teixeira A. C. (2013). Are academic spin-offs necessarily new technology-based firms? Working paper, Porto University.
33. Dahlstrand, A. L. (2007). Technology-based entrepreneurship and regional development: the case of Sweden. European Business Review, 19 (5), 373-386.
34. Dettwiler P., Lindelöf P. & Löfsten H. (2006). Utility of location: A comparative survey between small new technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks - Implications for facilities management. Technovation,26, 506-517.
35. Elaine C. & Leonie Q. (2002). The Impact of Collaboration Between Industry and Academia on SME Growth. Journal of Marketing Management, 18.
36. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy. 27.
37. Felsenstein, D. (1994).University-related science parks—‘seedbeds’ or enclaves of innovation? Technovation.14.
38. Ferguson, R. (1999). What's in a Location? Science Parks and the Support of New Technology-Based Firms.The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
39. Ferguson, R. & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs—Location, Survival and Growth. Journal of Technology Transfer.29.
40. Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science Parks in Japan and Their Value-Added Contributions to New Technology-Based Firms .International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24 (2), 381-400.
41. Fudickar,R,Hottenrott,H(2019). "Public research and the innovation performance of new technology based firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), 326-358.
42. Grilli, L. Jensen, P. H. & Murtinu, S. (2013). The Imprinting of Founders’ Human Capital on Entrepreneurial Venture Growth:Evidence from New Technology-Based Firms. Melbourne Institute Working Paper, 14, 13.
43. Gubeli, M. H. & Doloreux, D. (2005). An empirical study of university spin-off development. European Journal of Innovation Managemen,8.
44. Kirihata, T. (2007). The Cultivation of New Technology-based Firms and Roles of Venture Capital Firms in Japan. Kyoto Univercity.1-15.
45. Knight, G. A., & Kim, D. (2009). International business competence and the contemporary firm. Journal of International Business Studies. 40(2), 255–273.
46. Koh, F. C., Koh, W. T & Ted-Tschang, F. (2005). An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore. Jurnal of business venturing, 20.
47. Laranja, M. & Fontes, M. (1998). Creative adaptation: the role of new technology based firms in Portugal.Research policy, 26, 1023-1036.
48. Little, A. D. (1977). New Technology Based Firms in the UK and the FRG, Wilton House Publications, London.
49. Lofsten, H. & Lindelof, P. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms—assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and of Science Parks.The international journal of management science, 30.
50. Lofsten, H. & Lindelof, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31.
51. Lofsten, H. & Lindelof, P. (2001). Science Parks in Sweden Industerial Renewal and Development?, R & D Management, 31.
52. Lofsten, H. & Lindelof, P. (2003). Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: science parks and business policy in growing firms. Technovation, 23.
53. Maine , D., Shapiro, M. & Vining, R. (2010). The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms.journal Small Business Economy . 34,127–146.
54. Maki, K. Hytti, Ulla,(2008).Pitching Out the Lost Cases” – A Longitudinal Study of the Precedents of Non-Growth of Recent Incubator Graduates.International Council for Small Business World Conference, ICSB World Conference 2008
55. Maula M. V.( 2001).Corporate venture capital and the value-added for technology-based new firms; Helsinki University of Technology.
56. McAdam, M. & Marlow,S. (2008) . A preliminary investigation into networking activities within the university incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 14(4), pp.219‐241.
57. Mian S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy.25, 325-335.
58. Monck CSP, Porter RB, Quintas P, Storey DJ, Wynarczyk P (1988). Science parks and the growth of high technology frms.London: Croom Helm.
59. Oakey ,R(2007)New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millennium. Elsevier Science Ltd.
60. Olkiewicz, M.; Wolniak, R.; Eva-Grebski, M.; Olkiewicz, A.(2019) Comparative Analysis of the Impact of the Business Incubator Center on the Economic Sustainable Development of Regions in USA and Poland. Sustainability, 11, 173.
61. Onetti, A., Zucchella, A., Jones, M. V., & McDougall-Covin, P. P. (2012). Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: Business models for new technology-based firms.Journal of Management and Governance.16(3),337–368.
62. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures.Journal of International Business Studies. 25(1), 45–64.
63. Powers, J. and McDougall, P (2005).University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship.Journal of Business Venturing. 20.
64. Rannikko H.(2012). Early development of new technology-based firms; A Longitudinal Analysis on New Technology-Based Firms Development from Population Level and Firm Level Perspectives, Hanken School of Economics.
65. Ressico,Alessandra(2004).Innovative enterprises in science park: difficulty and route of growth .Nordic Conference on Small Business Research. 13th.
66. Rickne A. & Jacobsson S. (1996).New technology-based firms - An exploratory study of technology exploitation and industrial renewal.International Journal of Technology Management.11(3). 238-257.
67. Rory O’Shea. Thomas J. Allen. Arnaud Chevalier. Frank Roche.(2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34.
68. Rydehell,H,Isaksson,A, Löfsten,H (2019). Business networks and localization effects for new Swedish technology-based firms’ innovation performance,The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), P 15-47
69. Scillitoe, J. A. & Chakrabarti, K. A. (2010). The role of incubator interactions in assisting new ventures. Technovation, 30, 155–167.
70. Shearman, C. & Burrell, G. (1988). New technology-based firms and the emergence of new industries: Some employment implications.New Technology Work Employment, 3(2), 87–99.
71. Siegel, D. S., Westhead. P. & Wright, M. (2003). Science Parks and the Performance of New Technology-Based Firms:A Review of Recent U.K. Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research.Small Business Economics, 20.
72. Storey D. J. & Tether B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction.Research Policy.26, 933-946.
73. Westhead, P. & Batstone, S. (1998).Independent Technology-based Firms: The Perceived Benefits of a Science Park Location. Urban studies, 35.
74. Westhead, P. & Storey, D. J. (1995). Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms, 23.
75. Wolniak, R.; Grebski, M.E .(2017). Functioning of the business incubator center in GliwiceZeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Sl ˛askiej. Seria Organizacja i Zarz ˛adzanie , 105, 569–580.
76. Xiao, J. (2014).Ownership Change, Multinationals, and Growth of New Technology-Based Firms. Papers in Innovation Studies, Lund University, CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy ,No. 2014/24.
77. Yanga, B., Chih-Hai, K. & Motohashi, C. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan, Research Policy, 38, 77–85.