A Phenomenographic Study of Contradictions between Dispute Resolutions in Islam and International Law: Comparing Arbitration in Shiite Jurisprudence
Subject Areas : Islamic theologyMasoud Sheibak 1 , Nader Mokhtari Efrakati 2 , Mahmood Ghayoomzade 3
1 -
2 -
3 -
Keywords: Contradiction, Arbitration, Nominate Contract, Consensual Contract, Epistemology, Jurisprudence, Law.,
Abstract :
Religion-based arbitration is one the dispute resolution mechanisms that has many applications and benefits in global legal systems. “Hakamiyat” as an Islamic arbitration process enjoys different epistemological, anthropological and legal capacities which are not investigated and employed adequately. One reason its inherent contradiction with western legal systems that has brought about some serious challenges. Thus the current research was an attempt to adopt phenomenographic research to discover main components of the contradiction between “Hakamiyat” and international dispute resolution mechanisms. Research findings revealed that these contradictions bring about challenges in three dimensions including structural-epistemological contradictions, substantive contradiction, and procedural contradictions each entailing different variables. Research findings revealed that these contradictions bring about challenges in three dimensions including structural-epistemological contradictions, substantive contradiction, and procedural contradictions each entailing different variables. Research findings revealed that these contradictions bring about challenges in three dimensions including structural-epistemological contradictions, substantive contradiction, and procedural contradictions each entailing different variables.
