The necessity of recognizing the relationship between nature and man-made environment design ideas in modern architecture education
Subject Areas :Mehrnaz Mehrpoor Galeshkalami 1 , کیوان محمدپور 2 , saeed gholampour 3
1 - Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran.
2 - Master’s graduate, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
3 - Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Nature, architecture education, design art, modern architecture.,
Abstract :
The present article emphasizes the need to pay attention to the environmental dimensions and especially the natural substrate in architectural and urban planning projects. Comprehensive attention to nature is necessary in all cultural and climatic dimensions of architecture. Relying on the knowledge of technology, modern man has no qualms about changing and destroying nature, and a review of recent experiences shows the destruction of natural resources by implementing some plans on different scales. Of course, the advancement of technology does not necessarily conflict with the natural mechanism and sometimes it also takes steps to strengthen the relationship with the natural environment. This is despite the fact that the ancients paid more attention to nature and their hand-made works were made with much higher harmony than nature. Based on field observations and citing library sources and document analysis, this research seeks to prove the hypothesis that modern architectural knowledge should also give more importance to the adaptation of design to nature and take steps to strengthen human interaction with nature as much as possible. Undoubtedly, understanding this issue with practical training and workshops based on environmental knowledge can provide better conditions for sustainable development. The aim of this training will be to gain scientific knowledge about the resources of the natural environment, moral principles, values and skills in line with sustainable development.
1- حائری، ساناز؛ و مثنوی، محمدرضا(1402). تحلیل و تدوین راهبردهای بهسازی اکولوژیک رودخانه های شهری در چارچوب شهرسازی اکولوژیک. مجله منظر، (62)15، 54-71. doi:10.22034/manzar.2023.356492.2204
2- عزیزی، مهرداد؛ و رضایی، محمود(1400). تحلیل پارامتریک سایت پلان مبتنی بر روش ماتریس ارزیابی تأثیرات محیطی (مطالعه موردی: مجموعه آرامگاه شمس تبریزی). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های معماری نوین، 1(1)، 55-70. doi:10.52547/arch.1.1.55
3- عسگری، علی؛ و فتحی، راضیه(1401). نقش ابزارهای طراحی در کیفیت ایده¬پردازی و ارائه طرح¬های معماری. باغ نظر، 10(113)، 87-104. doi:10.22034/bagh.2022.319442.5068
4- محمدپور، کیوان؛ و عسگری، علی(1402). نحو فضا و روابط دیالکتیک کالبدیِ فرهنگسراهای معاصر تهران. رهپویه معماری و شهرسازی، 2(4)، 55-68. doi:10.22034/rau.2024.2019440.1076
5- Alexander, C. (2018). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford university press.
6- Browning, W. Ryan, C.O. & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment.
7- Brundtland, G. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427.
8- Fallon, S., & Pepper, E. (2011). Endangered science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(9), 479. doi :10.1890/1540-9295-9.9.479
9- Habermas, J. (1990). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. MIT press.
10- Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
11- Hutcheon, L. (2023). A theory of parody: The teachings of twentieth-century art forms. University of Illinois press.
12- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
13- Oxman, N. (2010). Structuring materiality: design fabrication of heterogeneous materials. Architectural Design, 80(4), 78-85. doi:10.1002/ad.1110
14- Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design studies, 52, 4-39. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001
15- Pallasmaa, J. (2024). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. John Wiley & Sons.
16- Sanz et al. (2011). Natural ventilation in buildings: A review. Renewable Energy Reviews, 15(6), 2429-2441.
17- School of Architecture, Louisiana State University, USA. (2010). Architectural education and the idea of nature, Eco-Architecture III, 109-117.
18- Soliman, A. M. (2017). Appropriate teaching and learning strategies for the architectural design process in pedagogic design studios. Frontiers of architectural research, 6(2), 204-217. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2017.03.002
19- Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. U of Minnesota P.
20- Wright, F. L. (1953). When art and architecture meet: A symposium held at Taliesin West in 1952. University of Arizona Press.
21- Wright, Frank Lloyd. (1953). Aperture. Minor White, San Francisco, California.
22- Zhong, W. Schroeder , T. & Bekkering , J. (2023). Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(4), 732-753. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2023.03.001
