Clarifying the position and role of innovative business ecosystem facilitators (shared workspaces and accelerators) in knowledge-based urban development and the formation of Isfahan's science and technology corridor
Subject Areas : Science and Technology Parks and IncubatorsSaeed Ebrahimi 1 , Golnaz shirazi 2
1 - Municipality
2 - -
Keywords: Knowledge-based urban development, knowledge-based economy, business ecosystem, innovation, system dynamics, Isfahan metropoli,
Abstract :
The knowledge-based urban development model considers the city as an ecosystem for the sustainability of knowledge, the realization of which depends on the realization of a knowledge-based economy, and to achieve a knowledge-based economy, the main elements of which are the production, distribution and application of knowledge, a platform for the creation of innovation must be provided. Targeted interactions and the exchange of knowledge cause innovation among individuals, groups and the creative class. Business ecosystems provide a high level of productivity by providing a favorable form of collaboration and partnership. One of the main components of these ecosystems are shared workspaces and accelerators, which try to reduce the gap between the current and desired status through innovation. In this research, using the system dynamics method, after identifying the main actors of the ecosystem of innovative businesses, their role and influence in urban development and knowledge-based economy was modeled and simulated. The general structure of the model includes 7 subsystems of population, education, information and communication technology infrastructures, research and development centers, knowledge-based companies, market and employment, which is simulated with the help of data collected by document method during the period of 2017-2018. The findings of the research show that the growth of support of accelerators and collaborative spaces for knowledge-based companies causes the growth of employment and the financial power of companies, and as a result, it helps to realize knowledge-based urban development through the formation of a knowledge-based economy.
1-شیخ‌زین‌الدین،محمود،کشمیری،مهدی،خاکباز،مهدی،خدابنده،لیلا(1393) جایگاه کریدورهای علم و فناوری در توسعه اقتصاد دانش محور، دوره 10، شماره38، صص2-13.
2- شاوردی، مرضیه، سلطانی، بهزاد(1398) ﻫﻢ ﺟﻮاري ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﯿﺎﯾﯽ: اﺑﺰاري ﺑﺮاي ﺣﻤﺎﯾﺖ از ﻧﻮآوري، ویژهﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﻋﻠﻢ، ﻓﻨﺎوري و ﻧﻮآوري، سال یازدهم، شماره 2، صص315-322.
3- طبیبی، حمیدرضا، رفیعیان، مجتبی، ماجدی، حمید، زیاری، یوسفعلی(1399) ﻧﻘﺶ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎي داﻧﺶ ﺑﻨﯿﺎن و ﻧﻮآور در ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷﻬﺮي و ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪاي، دانش شهرسازی، دوره 4، شماره1، صص 19-32.
4- ﺷﻬﻨﺎزي، روح اﷲ، دﻫﻘﺎن ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻧﯽ، زﻫﺮا (1394) اﺛﺮات اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ وﯾﮋه ﻋﻠﻢ و ﻓﻨﺎوري ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪاي: ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﻮردي ﺳﯿﻠﯿﮑﻮن وﻟﯽ، فصلنامه رشد و فناوری،11(43) ،44-54.
5-گودرزی،مهدی، نقی‌زاده، محمد، بیگلر، احسان(1397) عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت شتاب دهنده های حوزه زیست فناوری در ایران، نشریه علمی – پژوهشی مدییرت نوآوری، سال هفتم، شماره2، صص95-112.
6-معاونت توسعه کارافرینی و اشتغال (1397) طرح راه اندازی کافه کارآفرینی و فضای کار مشترک، تهران: انتشارات شهرداری تهران.
7-شیعه، عباس، حسینی، زهرا، رؤفی، روژین، معارف‌وند، زهرا(1400) توسعه شهری دانش بنیان در حوزه مرکزی شهرتهران ارایه پیشنهادات برنامه ریزی برای ارتقا عملکرد اجتماعی- محیطی نیروهای دانش بنیان در منطقه 6 شهرداری تهران،فصلنامه آرمانشهر، نشریه علمی-پژوهشی معماری و شهرسازی، دوره 14، شماره 36،صص224-239.
8-رﺣﻤﺎﻧﯿﺎن، ﺳﻌﯿﺪ؛ ﻧﺼﺮ، ﻣﻬﺪي (1389) اﯾﺠﺎد ﻇﺮﻓﯿﺖ ﺟﺬب ﺑﺮاي ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﯽ ﻧـﻮآوري ﺑﺎز درSMEﻫــﺎ. ﭼﻬﺎرﻣﯿﻦﮐﻨﻔﺮاﻧﺲ ﻣﻠﯽ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﻓﻨﺎوري.
9-شورای عالی اشتغال (1396) دستورالعمل صدور مجوز و ساماندهی مراکز مشاوره، اطلاع‌رسانی و خدمات کارآفرینی، شورای عالی اشتغال.
10-Alraouf, A. A. (2018). The myth of knowledge-based urban development in the Middle Eastern cities: a multilayered analysis. In Knowledge-Based Urban Development in the Middle East (pp. 1-23). IGI Global.
11-Spender, J.-C., Corvello, V., Grimaldi, M., & Rippa, P. (2017). Startups and open innovation: a review of the literature. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 4-30.
12-Fritsch, M. and Noseleit, F. 2013. Start-ups, long- and short-term survivors, and their contribution to employment growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23(4), pp.719-733
13-Koster, S. and van Stel, A. 2014. The relationship between start-ups, market mobility and employment growth: An empirical analysis for Dutch regions. Papers in Regional Science, 93(1), pp.203-217.
14-Morris, M.H., Shirokova, G. and Tsukanova, T. 2017. Student entrepreneurship and the university ecosystem: a multi-country empirical exploration. European Journal of International Management, 11(1), pp.65-85.
15-Sipola, S., Puhakka, V. and Mainela, T( 2016)A start-up ecosystem as a structure and context for high growth. Advances in International Management, Volume (29), pp. 179-202.
16- Ries, E. (2011). How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. The lean startup.
17- Moroni, I., Arruda, A., & Araujo, K. (2015). The design and technological innovation: how to understand the growth of startups companies in competitive business environment. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2199-2204
18- Tuli, S. C., Hu, R., & Dare, L. (2019). Planning a global knowledge city: experience from Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 10(1), 26-42.
19- Yigitcanlar, T., & Lönnqvist, A. (2013). Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance: Results from the international comparison of Helsinki. Cities, 31, 357-369
20- Dworak, E. (2010). Analysis of knowledge-based economy impact on economic development in the European Union countries. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 13(4), 5-25
21-Coccia, M. (2013). Population and technological innovation: the optimal interaction across modern countries.
22-Weinberger, V. P., Quiñinao, C., & Marquet, P. A. (2017). Innovation and the growth of human population. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1735), 20160415
23-Dima, A. M., Begu, L., Vasilescu, M. D., & Maassen, M. A. (2018). The relationship between the knowledge economy and global competitiveness in the European Union. Sustainability, 10(6), 1706.
24-Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579-594
25-Wong, C. Y. (2011). Rent-seeking, industrial policies and national innovation systems in Southeast Asian economies. Technology in Society, 33(3-4), 231-243.
-26 Lundvall, B. Å. (2016). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, 85.
27-Samara, E., Georgiadis, P., & Bakouros, I. (2012). The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technovation, 32(11), 624-638.
28-Álvarez, R. (2016). The impact of R&D and ICT investment on innovation and productivity in Chilean firms. Inter-American Development Bank Technical Note Series: Washignton DC, IDB-TN-1056, June.
