Identification of Effective Factors in Accepting Internet Objects from the Perspective of Users using the TAM Supplemental Model Presented in the Gao and Bai Model. Case Study: Customers of Iran Mobile Communications Company
Subject Areas : Technology Management
Mohammad Kargar sharif abad
1
,
mohsen gerami
2
,
ahmadali yazdanpanah
3
1 -
2 - Research Institute of Communication and Information Technology
3 -
Abstract :
The markets for mobile operators are changing rapidly and increasingly competitive, and for quick and effective responses to change customer needs in these markets, in order to remain at high levels of competition, operators are continually looking for ways to Overcoming rivals. Utilizing the valuable opportunity of Internet technology to create competitive advantage as the largest mobile phone operator in the Middle East is one of the key issues affecting customer satisfaction and preservation, and ultimately gaining market share in the current competitive market. In this research, using the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) and adding three factors of technology, social context and individual characteristics, and creating a model for accepting Internet technology, the objects of existing hypotheses were studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting the adoption of Internet technology of objects. For this purpose, 384 data from the first company customers were collected through a questionnaire. The data of this research have been analyzed using Smart PLS software and Structural Equation Method. According to the results obtained in this research, factors affecting the acceptance of Internet technology of objects among first-time subscribers, perceived usefulness, effects Social, pleasure and behavioral control. Meanwhile, behavioral control variable is felt and social impact has the greatest impact on adoption of this technology.
1- خراسانی، مجتبی. "بررسی عوامل پذیرش فناوری اینترنت‌اشیاء در سازمان‌های تولیدی". پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد. دانشگاه پیام‌نور استان تهران،1396.
2- فدیشه‌ای، حمید، علیرضا محمدباقر تهرانی، "حال و آینده تحقیق در دنیای اینترنت‌اشیاء"، سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های کاربردی در مهندسی کامپیوتر و فناوری اطلاعات، تهران، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک‌اشتر، ۱۳۹۴.
3- ابراهيم‌زاده صانع، محمد، سرگلزايي، شريفه، محمد ابراهيم‌زاده، صمد، اكبرپور، محمد، "طراحی مدلی برای افزایش امنیت فناوری اینترنت‌اشیا در حمل و نقل هوشمند" اولین کنفرانس بین‌المللی اینترنت‌اشیاء کاربردها و زیرساخت‌ها، 1396.
4- سعیدی، مهدیه، تاجفر، امیرهوشنگ، وحدت، داود."ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر در پذیرش فناوری اینترنت‌اشیاء در هوشمندسازی ساختمان‌ها (مورد مطالعه مشتریان شرکت‌های فعال در زمینه هوشمندسازی ساختمان‌ها در تهران)"، سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش در علوم و مهندسی، بانکوک، دبیرخانه دایمی کنفرانس، 1396.
5- میرمحمدیان, سیدمیلاد، برهلیا، ساسان، بابامحمودی، رمضان، آخوندی، زهرا، "مروری بر چالش‌ها و راهکارهای پیشگیری از چالش‌های اینترنت‌اشیاء"، دهمین همایش پژوهش‌های نوین در علوم و فناوری، بصورت الکترونیکی، شرکت علم محوران آسمان، ۱۳۹۶.
6- رحیمی، بهنام، ولی‌زاده، سیدجعفر، اکبرپور سکه، محمد، غلامعلی‌پور مقدم، هدا، "کاربرد فناوری اینترنت‌اشیاء در شهر هوشمند و چالش‌های آن"، چهارمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی علوم و مهندسی، ایتالیا- رم، مؤسسه مدیران ایده‌پرداز پایتخت ویرا، ۱۳۹۵.
7- Barnaghi, P., Wang, W., Henson, C. & Taylor, K. Semantics for the Internet of Things: early progress and back to the future. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 8(1): 1-21. (2012).
8- Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I. Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497-1516. (2012).
9- Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. The internet of things: A survey. Computer networks, 54(15), 2787-2805. (2010).
10- Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future generation computer systems, 29(7), 1645-1660. (2013).
11- Shen, G., & Liu, B. Research on Application of Internet of Things in Electronic commerce. In Electronic Commerce and Security (ISECS), 2010 Third International Symposium on IEEE, 13-16. (2010).
12- Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., & Michahelles, F. An architectural approach towards the future internet of things. In Architecting the internet of things. Springer Berlin Heidelberg ,1-24. (2011).
13- ITU Strategy and Policy Unit (SPU). ITU Internet Reports 2005: The internet of things. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/wsis/tunis/newsroom/stats/The-Internet-of- Things-2005.pdf. (Accessed on 02.11.2014). (2005).
14- Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster. (2010).
15- Thong, J. Y., & Yap, C. S. CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses. Omega, 23(4), 429-442.(1995).
16- Lee, Gwanhoo, & Xia, Weidong. Organizational size and IT innovation adoption: A meta-analysis. Information & Management, 43(8), 975-985. (2006).
17- Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1-13. (2014).
18- Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 358-390 .(2012).
19- Yang, Z., Kankanhalli, A., Ng, B. Y., & Lim, J. T. Y. Analyzing the enabling factors for the organizational decision to adopt healthcare information systems. Decision Support Systems, 55(3), 764-776. (2013).
20- Gao, L., & Bai, X. A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(2), 211-231. (2014).
21- Yi-Cheng, C., Yi-Chien, L. V., & Ron-Chuen, Y. Examining factors influencing behavioral intentions to use asynchronous web-based language learning. PACIS 2006 Proceedings, 65. (2006).
22- Kim, G.S., Park, S. B. and Oh, J. An examination of factors influencing consumer adoption of short message service (SMS), Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 769-786. (2008).
23- Martínez-Caro, E., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., García-Pérez, A., & Fait, M. Healthcare service evolution towards the Internet of Things: An end-user perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. (2018).
24- Luthra, S., Garg, D., Mangla, S. K., & Berwal, Y. P. S. Analyzing challenges to Internet of Things (IoT) adoption and diffusion: An Indian context. Procedia Computer Science, 125, 733-739. (2018).
25- Mital, M., Chang, V., Choudhary, P., Papa, A., & Pani, A. K. Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. (2017).
26- Park, E., Cho, Y., Han, J., & Kwon, S. J. Comprehensive Approaches to User Acceptance of Internet of Things in a Smart Home Environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 2342-2350. (2017).
27- Lu, M. T., Lin, S. W., & Tzeng, G. H. Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decision Support Systems, 56, 259-269. (2013).
28- Gefen, D. D., Straub, A. Practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the AIS. 16. 91–109. (2005).
29- Cronbach, L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. (1951).
30- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. Evaluating struc¬tural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Re¬search, 18(1), 39–50. (1981).
31- Chin, W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Sys¬tems Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16. (1998).
32- Huber, F., Herrmann, A., Frederik, M., Vogel, J., Vollhardt, K. Kausalmodellierung mit Partial Least Squares- Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: Gabler. (2007).
33- Lu, H.-P. and Su, P.Y.-J. Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites, Internet Research, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 442-458.(2009).
34- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. and Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 157-178. (2012).
35- Ha, S. and Stoel, L. Consumer e-shopping acceptance: antecedents in a technology acceptance model, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62 No. 5, pp. 565-571. (2009).
36- Chong, A.Y.-L., Chan, F.T. and Ooi, K.-B. Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 34-43. (2012).
