اولویت‌بندی صلاحیت‌های حرفه‌ای اساتید ریاضی دانشگاه فرهنگیان با روش تاپسیس فازی
الموضوعات :
مرجان معیری
1
(گروه آموزش ریاضی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران)
پروانه امیری پور
2
(گروه آموزش ریاضی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران )
الکلمات المفتاحية: صلاحیت‌های حرفه‌ای, اساتید ریاضی, تدریس, تاپسیس فازی, تکنیک دلفی, دانشگاه فرهنگیان,
ملخص المقالة :
انتخاب اساتید ریاضی در دانشگاه‌ها مسئله مهمی است و استادان از ارکان اصلی دانشگاه‌ها هستند و ارتقا کیفیت عملکرد آن‌ها، منجر به ارتقای کیفیت رشته ریاضی دانشگاه‌ها می‌شود. از فرایندهایی که به‌منظور این ارتقا کیفیت انجام می‌شود، ارزیابی و توسعه صلاحیت‌های حرفه‌ای اساتید ریاضی است. هدف از اجرای این تحقیق اولویت‌بندی صلاحیت‌های حرفه‌ای اساتید ریاضی دانشگاه‌های فرهنگیان کشور از طریق تاپسیس فازی است. تحقيق حاضر ازنظر هدف، كاربردي و ازنظر ماهيت و روش، تلفیقی از روش‌های تحلیل محتوای اسنادی، توصيفي- تحليلـــــي است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق با توجه به استفاده از تکنیک دلفی، در بخش شناسایی مولفه ها شامل 12 نفر از خبرگان با تجربه ای است که در زمینه ریاضی فعال می باشند انتخاب گردید. متدولوژی این تحقیق بدین گونه است که در ابتدا با انجام مطالعه بر روی ادبیات موضوعی و پژوهش های مرتبط پیشین، 80 مؤلفه برای صلاحیت‌های حرفه‌ای اساتید ریاضی فهرست گردید، که پس از تهیه پرسشنامه و تکمیل کردن آن توسط خبرگان با استفاده از تکنیک دلفی به چهار مؤلفه و 13 زیرمولفه تلخیص شدند که این چهار مؤلفه به‌صورت صلاحیت دانش حرفه‌ای (با سه مشخصه)، صلاحیت توانایی حرفه‌ای (با سه مشخصه)، صلاحیت مهارت حرفه‌ای (با چهار مشخصه) و صلاحیت ویژگی حرفه‌ای (با سه مشخصه) دسته‌بندی شدند. برای بررسی روایی محتوایی، پرسش نامه طراحی شده در اختیار اعضای خبرگان قرار گرفت و بر اساس نظرات اعلام شده، شاخص روایی محتوایی(CVI=0/90) و نسبت روایی محتوایی (CVR=0/87) محاسبه گردید. پایایی پرسشنامه با آلفای کرونباخ 89/0 تعیین شد. در مرحله دوم برای رتبه‌بندی صلاحیت‌های انتخاب‌شده تعداد پنج نفر از اساتید ریاضی دانشگاه فرهنگیان هرمزگان (پردیس‌های شهید بهشتی و فاطمه الزهرا هرمزگان) به‌صورت هدفمند انتخاب شدند که میزان اهمیت هركدام از شاخص‌ها را در یك پرســـــشنامه طراحی‌شده تعیین نموده‌اند و سپس اطلاعات با استفاده از روش تاپسیس فازی مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفت. بر اساس یافته‌ها صلاحیت دانش حرفه ای ، توانایی حرفه ای ، ویژگی حرفه ای و مهارت حرفه ای به ترتیب بیشترین اهمیت را داشتند و همچنین از بین زیر مؤلفه‌ها دانش برقراری ارتباط، دانش تخصصی، مهارت تدریس و ویژگی‌های اخلاقی بیشترین وزن دهی را به خود اختصاص دادند. با توجه به نتایج بیان‌شده می‌توان دریافت که دانشگاه‌های فرهنگیان می‌توانند جهت انتخاب صلاحیت‌های حرفه‌ای اساتید ریاضی خود از نتایج این تحقیق استفاده نمایند.
[1]. Saif A.A. Educational Psychology (Psychology of Learning and Education), Tehran: Agah Publications; 2011.
[2].Niknami M, Karimi F. A study of the professional competencies of general education teachers and presentation of an appropriate conceptual framework.2009:1-22.
[3]. Bjekic D, Krneta R, Milosevic D. Teacher education from e-learner to e-teacher: Master curriculum. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET. 2010 Jan; 9(1):202-12.
[4]. SH, N., J, P., GH, N., B, J. On the Relationship of Self-efficacy and Organizational commitment to Teaching Quality of Faculty Members in Zone of Islamic Azad University. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 2013; 4(15): 21-44.
[ 5].Hajizadeh E AM. Methods and statistical analyzes with the new approach to research
method. Jahade daneshgahi. 2012
[6]. Hosseini M . Strategies and methods for upgrading and developing the capabilities and skills of academics, the first higher education seminar in Iran, Tehran; 2001.
[7]. Keller G. The new demographics of higher education. The review of higher education. 2001;24(3):219-35.
[8]. Roscoe J. Continuing professional development in higher education. Human Resource Development International. 2002; 5(1):3-9.
[9]. Ackfeldt AL, Coote LV. A study of organizational citizenship behaviors in a retail setting. Journal of business research. 2005; 58(2):151-9.
[10]. McLean M, Cilliers F, Van Wyk JM. Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Medical teacher. 2008; 30(6):555-84.
[11]. Yousefzadeh M.R , Mohebbi A, Shah Moradi M. Qualitative teaching in higher education. Tehran: Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences Publications; 2017.
[12]. Yazdani E, Soleimanpouromran M. The Relationship between Communication Skills and Quality of Teaching in University Lecturers from the Viewpoint of Medical Students. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2018; 9(4):82-9.
[13]. Shabani H. .Educational skills. Twenty-ninth Edition. Tehran: Samat ; .
[14].Maleki H . Basic teaching skills. First Edition, Tehran: Ayizh Publications;2017.
[15]. Jenaabadi H, Nastiezaie N. Comparing the Current and Desired State of Teaching Professional Ethics among Faculty Members; University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2015; 8(5):317-22.
[16]. Bameni Moghadam, M., Rafiey, S. Evaluation of Teaching Quality of Faculty Members in Higher Education Institutions: A case study of Faculty of Economics at Allameh Tabataba'i University. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 2017; 8(29): 1-22.
[17]. Patrick CL. Student evaluations of teaching: effects of the Big Five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2011; 36(2):239-49.
[18]. Yaghoubi M, Salimi M. Determining the factors affecting faculties' educational evaluation in a military university of medical sciences in Tehran, Iran. Journal of Military Medicine. 2018; 20(1):73-82.
[19]. Eslamian H. Evaluation of application measure of effective teaching components by faculty members of Isfahan University of medical science based on the of. Journal of Medicine and Cultivation. 2018; 27:190-203.
[20]. Salar, R., Mohammad Khani, K., Mohammad Davoudi, A. Presentation of A Model for Teaching Faculty Members in Amin Police University. Resource Management in Police Journal of the Management Dept, 2018; 1397(24): 185-210.
[21]. Khadiv, A., Seyed Kalan, S. Affecting Factors on teaching quality in Farhangian University (Case Study: College of Ardabil). Educational and Scholastic studies, 2018; 7(1): 39-70.
[22]. Atashrouz M, Pourmoghadasian AM, Marashi SM. Investigating the teaching quality of faculty members from the perspective of students; the case of branches of Farhangian University in Khuzestan Province. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 2018; 8(23):49-79.
[23]. Rezaii A, Grami Pour M. Structure, factorialvalidityand Reliability, quality of teaching instrument inthe Behavioral Science. PSYCHOMETRY. 2017; 5(20):103-25.
[24]. Roshan Ghiyas E, Saadat T, Valipour Kotnaei M & Yasai F. Evaluation of qualifications of primary school teachers in Sari, 2nd International Conference on Management and Social Sciences; 2017.
[25]. Akhgar M , Khalili M. Investigating the role of professional qualifications of primary school teachers on student citizenship education, Second National Conference on Teacher Education, Isfahan; 2017.
[26]. Sadigh Maroufi S, َMohammadi A, Mousavi M, Raadabadi M. study of most important factors influencing the effectiveness of teaching from viewpoint of graduate students: AHP model approach. jmed. 2014; 9 (3) :58-66
[27]. Salimi, J., Ramezani, G. Identification of the Components of Effective Teaching and Assessment of Teaching Case Study: University of Applied Science of Kurdistan Province). Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 2015; 4(8): 33-61.
[28]. Mahmoudi Sahebi, M., Nasri, S., Gholinia, H. Identifying Criteria for Evaluating Teaching Performance of Faculty Members with Emphasizing on Engineering Teaching. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 2013; 7(3): 203-212.
[29]. Ghonji M, Hosseini S. M & Hejazi Y. Identification and ranking of factors explaining the quality of teaching from the viewpoint of faculty members of agricultural campuses of Tehran University. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 2012;5(3): 31-40 .
[30]. Motallebifard A, Navehebrahim A, Mohsenzadeh F. Recognizing professional and ethical indicators in university teaching from the perspectives of postgraduate students: a qualitative approach.2012;9-16.
[31]. Raoufi SH, Seikhian A, Ebrahimzade F, Tarahi MJ, Ahmadi P. Designing a novel sheet to evaluate theoretical teaching quality of faculty members based on viewpoints of stakeholders and charles E. Glassickś scholarship principles. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2010;14(3):167-76.
[32]. Vakili A, Hajaghajani S, Rashidy-Pour A, Ghorbani R. An investigation of factors influencing student evaluation of teacher performance: A comprehensive study in Semnan University of Medical Sciences. Koomesh. 2011;93-103.
[33]. Afshar M, Taheri MH, Ryasi HR, Naseri M. Evaluation of faculty members by students with different educational development. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2010; 17(2).
[34]. Navabi N, Jahanian I, HAJ AM, Parvaneh M. Criteria for a desirable teacher from the view point of students of Babol University of Medical Sciences.1389,12(5):7-13.
[35]. Haerizadeh SA, Asgharpour A, Noghani M, Miranvari A. Investigating the impact of student-faculty member interactions on students’ educational achievement. Journal of Social Sciences. 2009 ;1:27-51.
[36]. Ghorbani R, Haji-Aghajani S, Heidarifar M, Andade F, Shams-Abadi M. Viewpoints of nursing and para-medical students about the features of a good university lecturer. Koomesh. 2009; 10 (2) :77-8
[37]. Lazarides R, Buchholz J. Student-perceived teaching quality: How is it related to different achievement emotions in mathematics classrooms?. Learning and Instruction. 2019; 61:45-59.
[38]. Tadesse T, Manathunga CE, Gillies RM. Making sense of quality teaching and learning in higher education in Ethiopia: Unfolding existing realities for future promises. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. 2018; 15(1):4.
[39]. Lao HA, Kaipatty GJ, da Costa Jeronimo A. A Study on Teachers’ Competency In Teaching English At SMA Negeri .Inprosiding Seminar National & Internasional; 2017:1(2).
[40]. Azkiyah SN, Mukminin A. In search of teaching quality of EFL student teachers through teaching practicum: lessons from a teacher education program. CEPS Journal. 2017; 7(4):105-24.
[41]. Hubackova S. The importance of foreign language education. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2016; 2(5).
[42]. Iloanya J. Quality teacher education in Botswana: A crucial requirement for effective teaching and learning. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), Special Issue. 2014; 3(1):1743-9.
[43]. Clipa O. The profile of the academic assessor. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 12:200-4.
[44]. Opre D, Calbaza-Ormenisan M, Opre A. University teaching: didactic expertise reflected by metacognitive abilities and emotional control. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 29:670-7.
[45]. Amira R, Jelas ZM. Teaching and learning styles in higher education institutions: Do they match?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;7:680-4.
[46]. Obeidi N. Effective factors on the communication between students and faculty members in the viewpoint of paramedical students.2010;3 (3): 133-136.
[47]. Saka AZ. Hitting two birds with a stone: Assessment of an effective approach in science teaching and improving professional skills of student teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2009;1(1):1533-44.
[48]. Chansiri W, Srisa-ard B. Core Competency of Universities Supporting-Line Administrators in Thailand. The Social Sciences Journal. 2009;4:128-32.
[49]. Brightman HJ, Elliott ML, Bhada Y. Increasing the effectiveness of student evaluation of instructor data through a factor score comparative report. Decision Sciences. 1993;24(1):192-9.
[50]. Shulman LS. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher. 1986;15(2):4-14.
[51]. Chen SJ, Hwang CL. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. 1992:289-486.
[52]. Kani H. M. A, Ali Ahmadi, H. R. & Ali Ahmadi, A.Prioritization of study plans for the development of the country's telecommunications using decision-making techniques with multiple criteria, Approach 27;2003.
[53]. Ghodsipour H . Topics in Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Hierarchical Analysis Process. Amirkabir University of Technology;2001.
[54].Ghorchiyan N. Details of Teaching Methods, International Association for Scientific Participation, Ministry of Education, Tehran: Iran;2001.
[55]. Farzaneh M, Poorkarimi J & ezati, M. Studying Relationship between Professional Competencies a nd Psychological Empowerment of High School Teachers in the County of Shirvan. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 2015; 2(8): 69-88.
[56]. Koster B, Brekelmans M, Korthagen F, Wubbels T. Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and teacher education. 2005; 21(2):157-76.
[57]. Ng W, Nicholas H, Williams A. School experience influences on pre-service teachers' evolving beliefs about effective teaching. Teaching and teacher education. 2010 1; 26(2):278-89.
[58]. Singh S, Pai DR, Sinha NK, Kaur A, Soe HH, Barua A. Qualities of an effective teacher: what do medical teachers think?. BMC medical education. 2013; 13(1):1-7.
[59]. Banidavoodi S. The comparison of characteristics of effective teaching from students’ perspective in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Biannual Journal of Medical Education Education Development Center (edc) Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2014; 2(2):7-13.
[60]. Mohammadi R, Hasani A. Investigating the effect of lesson study process on teachers professional development. 2019: 1-18.
[61]. Gove A, Dubeck MM. Assess reading early to inform instruction, improve quality, and realize possibilities. Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2016; 2016
[62]. Sayyadi M, Vahabi A, Vahabi B, Roshani D. Students' viewpoints on the effective teaching and related factors in Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences and Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, 2015. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. 2016; 21(1).
[63]. Karimi F. Study of professional qualifications of primary school teachers. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management.2009; 2 (4), 164-165
[64]. Hatami H. Designing a model for evaluating the performance of elementary school teachers. PhD Thesis in Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch;2005.
[65]. Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, Ivey MA, Coviello DM, Lynch KG, Dugosh KL, Habing B. Relationship of mental health and illness in substance abuse patients. Personality and individual differences. 2010; 49(8):880-4.
[66]. Tadesse T, Manathunga CE, Gillies RM. Making sense of quality teaching and learning in higher education in Ethiopia: Unfolding existing realities for future promises. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. 2018; 15(1):4.
[67]. Adhami A, Mohammad Alizadeh S. The study students Veiws about faculty academic Advising and consulting duties in k erman university of medical sciences in second semester in 2006. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2009; 5(2):94-101.
[68]. Huntly H. Teachers’ work: Beginning teachers’ conceptions of competence. The Australian Educational Researcher. 2008; 35(1):125-45.
[69]. Avalos B. Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education. 2011; 27(1):10-20.
