بررسي تطبيقي رسالت‌ها و شيوه‌هاي آموزش مراکز رشد حرفه‌اي اعضای هیأت علمی در دانشگاه‌هاي برتر جهان
الموضوعات :
بتول جمالی زواره
1
(دانشگاه اصفهان)
احمدرضا نصر اصفهانی
2
(دانشگاه اصفهان)
محمدرضا نیلی
3
(دانشگاه علامه طباطبايي)
الکلمات المفتاحية: مراکز رشد حرفه¬, اي, رسالت¬, ها, تدریس و یادگیری, شيوه¬, هاي آموزش.,
ملخص المقالة :
هدف اين مقاله بررسي تطبيقي رسالت ها و شيوه هاي آموزش مراکز رشد حرفه اي اعضاي هیئت علمي در دانشگاه هاي برتر جهان مي باشد. به منظور دستيابي به اين هدف 15 دانشگاه برتر دنيا به صورت هدفمند و بر اساس رتبه بندي شانگهاي از پنج قاره جهان انتخاب شد و مراکز رشد حرفه اي اين دانشگاه ها در دو حيطه رسالت ها و اهداف و شيوه هاي آموزش مورد بررسي قرار گرفت. روش مورد استفاده در اين مطالعه تطبيقي- تحلیلی بوده است. در اين روش اطلاعات مورد نياز پژوهش با استفاده از اسناد و مدارک موجود جمع آوري شده است، سپس به صورت مقوله هاي مجزا طبقه بندي و مورد بررسي، تحليل و مقايسه قرار گرفت. نتايج اين پژوهش نشان داد ارتقاي کيفيت تدريس و يادگيري، ارتقاء پژوهش هاي دانشگاهي در حيطه تدريس و يادگيري و استفاده از تکنولوژي هاي جديد در تدريس و يادگيري سه هدف عمده ايجاد مراکز يادگيري و تدريس در دانشگاه هاي مورد بررسي بوده است. مهم ترين روش هاي آموزش برگزاري کارگاه، کنفرانس، سمينار و مشاوره، منتورینگ و دوره هاي مهارت آموزي می باشد.
1. Johannes C, Fendler J, Seidel T. Teachers’ perceptions of the learning environment and their knowledge base in a training program for novice university teachers, International Journal for Academic Development, 2013؛ 18(2): 152-165.
2. Baldwin R, DeZure D, Shaw A, Moretto, K. Mapping the terrain of mid-career faculty at a research university: Implications for faculty and academic leaders. Change, 2008; 40 (5): 46-55.
3. Aggarwal N. Faculty development in a flexible learning context, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013; 93: 1329 – 1332.
4. Nworie J, Charles C, Charles, K J. Engaging higher education faculty in innovative professional, in: Villae-Angulo, L. M. & Alegre- Dela; University teaching and faculty development research, New Yourk: Nova Publisher; 2013.
5. Sorcinelli M, Austin, AE. Educational developers: The multiple structures and influences that support our work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010; 122: 25-36.
6. Fink LD. Improving the evaluation of college teaching. In K. H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen, & E. C. Wadsworth (Eds.), A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources, (pp.46-58), 2002.
7. Daneshmandi S, Fathi Vajargah K, Ghlichlee B. The application of mentoring method for university faculty members: A Review Study, Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2017; 14:77-102.
8. Levine-Sauberman, MH. A Case study of faculty development in a community college’s teaching and learning center, dissertation. Boston: Northeastern University; 2014.150p.
9. Torry, EJ. Faculty development centers in higher education: incorporating diversity and technology. dissertation. Florida: Atlantic University;2002.305p.
10. Flick L, Sadri P, Morrell PD, Wainwright C, Schepige, A. A cross disciplinestudy of reformed teaching by University science and mathematics faculty. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 2009;109(4): 197-211.
11. Glauser-Patton HM. A case study of university professor’s perception of their experience with faculty development, dissertation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska; 2010.118p.
12. Sorcinelli MD, Austin AE, Eddy PL, Beach AL. Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing, 2006.
13. McGowan WR, Graham CR. Factors contributing to improved teaching performance Innovative Higher Education, 2009; 34(3):161-171.
14. Lee V. Program types and prototypes. In K. J. Gillespie & D. L. Robertson (Eds.), A guide to faculty developmen (pp. 21-28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2010
15. Daneshmandi S, Fathi Vajargah K, Chorasani A, Ghlichlee B. Exploring the Interaction between Mentor & Mentee in Mentoring of New Hired Faculty Members of Universities: Qualitative Approach, Quarterly Journal of Training and Development. 2017; 14:29-55.
16. Kalbasi A, Nasr AR. Investigating the necessity of creating new educational centers at our universities, Higher Education Letter, 2011: 13(4):9-28.
17. Zaresefat S, Dehghani M, Hakimzadeh R, Karami M, Salehi K. Null curricula for the professional development of faculty members of Iranian Universities: Ferdowsi University, Iran, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2018;17:183-216
18. Center for the Promotion of Excellence in Higher Education, - The University Kyoto, cited 2018/01/20.Available from URL: www.highedu.kyoto-u.ac.jp/eng/
19. Innovation (CEI), The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, cited 2018/01/20. Available from URL: www.highedu.kyoto-u.ac.jp/eng
20. Center for Instructional Resource. Chang Gung University. cited 2018/01/20. Available from: http://cfir.cgu.edu.tw/bin/home.php
21. Center for Development of Teaching & Learning, National University of Singapore. cited 2018/01/25. Available from URL: http://www.cdtl.nus.edu.sg
22. Institute for Teaching and Learning Innovation (ITaLI), University of Queensland. cited 2018/02/07. Available from URL, http://www.uq.edu.au/teaching-learning
23. Cambridge Centre for Teaching and Learning. cited 2018/01/26. Available from URL: https://www.cctl.cam.ac.uk
24. Oxford Learning Institute, University of Oxsford. cited 2018/01/29. Available from URL: http://www.learning.ox.ac.uk/pdr
25. Centre for Teaching and Learning, Aarhus University. cited 2018/02/07. Available from URL: http://cul.au.dk/en.
26. Centre for the Advancement of Teaching, Stockholm University. cited 2018/02/07. Available from URL: https://www.su.se/ceul/english
27. Office of the vice-provost for teaching and learning, Stanford University. cited 2018/01/26. Available from URL: https://vptl.stanford.edu/getting-started-vptl
28. Office of Faculty Development & Diversity, Harward University. cited 2018/01/26. Available from URL:/ https://faculty.harvard.edu
29. Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Alberta. cited 2018/02/02. Available from URL:https://www.ualberta.ca/centre-for-teaching-and-learning
30. The Centre for Teaching and Learning،University of Toronto. cited 2018/02/03. Available from URL: http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/ctl/welcome-centre-teaching-and-learning.
31. Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching, University of Cape Town. cited 2018/01/16. available from URL: http://www.uct.ac.za/main/teaching-and-learning,
32. Teaching & Learning Office in University of KwaZulu-Natal. cited 2018/01/16. Available from URL: http://utlo.ukzn.ac.za.
33. Grave WD, Zanting A, Mansvelder-Longayroux, DD, Molenaar WM. Workshops and seminars: Enhancing effectiveness, In: Yvonne Steinert(ed), Faculty development in the health professions: A Focus on Research and Practice, London: Springer, 2014.
34. Daneshmandi S, Fathi Vajargah K, khorasani A. Ghlichlee B. Studying the consequences of applying mentoring in order to empowering new faculty members: Content Analysis, New Approach in Educational Management,2018;9(2):105-128.
35. Ellis DE, Ortquist- Ahrens A. Practical suggestions for programs and activities, In: In K. J. Gillespie & D. L. Robertson (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (pp. 117-132). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2010.
36. Mosapoor, N. preface, in: An introduction to teaching at university towards professorship, Mehrmohammady Et al. Tehran: tarbiat madares university,2012.
37. Groccia J. Why faculty development? Why now, In A. Saroyan and Mariane Frenay(ed),] Building teaching capacities in higher education, A Comprehensive International Mode [l, (pp. 1-20). Stylus Publishing;2010
38. McKee, WC, Tew, MW. Setting the stage for teaching and learning in American higher education: Making the case for faculty development. NDTL. 2013; 133: 3-14.
