Evaluating the performance of non-reactive and reactive agility tests in elite and average soccer players under the age of 14
محورهای موضوعی : فیزیولوژی ورزشی
Mohammad Tajik
1
(Department of Exercise Physiology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Mohammad Ali Azarbayjani
2
(Professor, Department of Exercise Physiology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Maghsoud Peeri
3
(Professor, Department of Exercise Physiology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
کلید واژه: Agility, Perception, Decision-making, Change of direction, Lateral superiority,
چکیده مقاله :
Background: Agility is one of the most critical factors in the sport performance of soccer players. Although various tests have been designed to measure agility, there is no agility test, based on soccer-specific movement patterns. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and examine of a soccer Specific Reactive Agility Test (SSRAGT)for Players U14 Years. Materials and Methods: 48 soccer players under the age of 14 years divided in two groups composed of 24 players. The group A were elite soccer players and active at the level of Asia vision, while group B were soccer players were active at the level of neighborhood and local competitions One hundred and seventy competitive soccer players under 14 years volunteered to participation in this study as subjects. The standard 505 Agility Test (505AT), Zig-zag Curl (ZZC) ، Zig-zag straight (ZZS) the test was performed for all participants on two separate days within a two-day interval at the same time and place. The SSRAGT was performed after two days. Results: In order to evaluate the intensity of agility test the number of steps and heartbeat after activity was applied. The 505-agility test with a heartbeat of 159.4±11.245b was lower than other tests. The number of steps in the 505-agility test indicated lower intensity and fewer steps 26.30±4.794b. The heartbeat and number of steps in the other test had a significant correlation with each other. The results of logistic regression between 48 player SSRAGT test can significantly predict the level of performance of young football players (OR = 1.437, P <0.01). As the ZZC test was able to significantly predict the performance level of the subjects in this study (OR = 1.05, P <0.01). Conclusion: Based on the result the reactive agility test for the soccer player in comparison with non-reactive agility test had the potential to distinguish between average and elite soccer players and due to its reactive nature, it is similar to movement patter in soccer, so it can be used as an efficient field tool to evaluate players’ agility levels.
Background: Agility is one of the most critical factors in the sport performance of soccer players. Although various tests have been designed to measure agility, there is no agility test, based on soccer-specific movement patterns. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and examine of a soccer Specific Reactive Agility Test (SSRAGT)for Players U14 Years. Materials and Methods: 48 soccer players under the age of 14 years divided in two groups composed of 24 players. The group A were elite soccer players and active at the level of Asia vision, while group B were soccer players were active at the level of neighborhood and local competitions One hundred and seventy competitive soccer players under 14 years volunteered to participation in this study as subjects. The standard 505 Agility Test (505AT), Zig-zag Curl (ZZC) ، Zig-zag straight (ZZS) the test was performed for all participants on two separate days within a two-day interval at the same time and place. The SSRAGT was performed after two days. Results: In order to evaluate the intensity of agility test the number of steps and heartbeat after activity was applied. The 505-agility test with a heartbeat of 159.4±11.245b was lower than other tests. The number of steps in the 505-agility test indicated lower intensity and fewer steps 26.30±4.794b. The heartbeat and number of steps in the other test had a significant correlation with each other. The results of logistic regression between 48 player SSRAGT test can significantly predict the level of performance of young football players (OR = 1.437, P <0.01). As the ZZC test was able to significantly predict the performance level of the subjects in this study (OR = 1.05, P <0.01). Conclusion: Based on the result the reactive agility test for the soccer player in comparison with non-reactive agility test had the potential to distinguish between average and elite soccer players and due to its reactive nature, it is similar to movement patter in soccer, so it can be used as an efficient field tool to evaluate players’ agility levels.
1. Dugdale JH, Sanders D, Hunter AM. Reliability of Change of Direction and Agility Assessments in Youth Soccer Players. Sports (Basel). 2020 Apr 18;8(4):51. doi: 10.3390/sports8040051. PMID: 32325738; PMCID: PMC7240391.
2. Makhlouf I, Chaouachi A, Chaouachi M, Ben Othman A, Granacher U, Behm DG. Combination of Agility and Plyometric Training Provides Similar Training Benefits as Combined Balance and Plyometric Training in Young Soccer Players. Front Physiol. 2018 Nov 13;9:1611. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01611. PMID: 30483158; PMCID: PMC6243212.
3. Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I., et al., Applicability of an agility test in young players in the soccer field. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 2015. 21: p. 133-138. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbme/a/Sk5xZYfp8q8PCfhYXdxthcf/?lang=en
4. Sekulic D, Foretic N, Gilic B, Esco MR, Hammami R, Uljevic O, Versic S, Spasic M. Importance of Agility Performance in Professional Futsal Players; Reliability and Applicability of Newly Developed Testing Protocols. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 4;16(18):3246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183246. PMID: 31487901; PMCID: PMC6766010.
5. Acar, H. and N. Eler, The Effect of Balance Exercises on Speed and Agility in Physical Education Lessons. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2019. 7(1): p. 74.https://www.hrpub.org/journals/article_info.php?aid=7646
6. Bana, O., E. Mintarto, and N. Kusnanik. The Effect of Acceleration Sprint and Zig-zag Drill Combination to Increase Students’ Speed and Agility. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012040
7. Granacher U, Borde R. Effects of Sport-Specific Training during the Early Stages of Long-Term Athlete Development on Physical Fitness, Body Composition, Cognitive, and Academic Performances. Front Physiol. 2017 Oct 16;8:810. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00810. PMID: 29085304; PMCID: PMC5650693.
8. Lloyd, R.S., et al., Considerations for the development of agility during childhood and adolescence. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 2013. 35(3): p. 2-11.https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1539&context=ecuworks2013.
9. Kutlu M, Yapici H, Yilmaz A. Reliability and Validity of a New Test of Agility and Skill for Female Amateur Soccer Players. J Hum Kinet. 2017 Mar 12;56:219-227. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0039. PMID: 28469760; PMCID: PMC5384069.
10. King LA, Mancini M, Smulders K, Harker G, Lapidus JA, Ramsey K, Carlson-Kuhta P, Fling BW, Nutt JG, Peterson DS, Horak FB. Cognitively Challenging Agility Boot Camp Program for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson Disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 May;34(5):417-427. doi: 10.1177/1545968320909331. Epub 2020 Apr 4. PMID: 32249668; PMCID: PMC7217755.
11. Pojskic H, Åslin E, Krolo A, Jukic I, Uljevic O, Spasic M, Sekulic D. Importance of Reactive Agility and Change of Direction Speed in Differentiating Performance Levels in Junior Soccer Players: Reliability and Validity of Newly Developed Soccer-Specific Tests. Front Physiol. 2018 May 15;9:506. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00506. PMID: 29867552; PMCID: PMC5962722.
12. Hachana Y, Chaabène H, Ben Rajeb G, Khlifa R, Aouadi R, Chamari K, Gabbett TJ. Validity and reliability of new agility test among elite and subelite under 14-soccer players. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 21;9(4): e95773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095773. PMID: 24752193; PMCID: PMC3994134.
13. Reina R, Sarabia JM, Caballero C, Yanci J. How does the ball influence the performance of change of direction and sprint tests in para-footballers with brain impairments? Implications for evidence-based classification in CP-Football. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 3;12(11):e0187237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187237. PMID: 29099836; PMCID: PMC5669430.
14. Yuasa Y, Kurihara T, Isaka T. Relationship Between Toe Muscular Strength and the Ability to Change Direction in Athletes. J Hum Kinet. 2018 Oct 15;64:47-55. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0183. PMID: 30429898; PMCID: PMC6231329.
15. Krolo A, Gilic B, Foretic N, Pojskic H, Hammami R, Spasic M, Uljevic O, Versic S, Sekulic D. Agility Testing in Youth Football (Soccer)Players; Evaluating Reliability, Validity, and Correlates of Newly Developed Testing Protocols. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 1;17(1):294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010294. PMID: 31906269; PMCID: PMC6981745.
16. Loturco, I., et al., Mixed training methods: effects of combining resisted sprints or plyometrics with optimum power loads on sprint and agility performance in professional soccer players. Frontiers in physiology, 2017. 8: p. 1034. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.01034/full
17. Florin, T.D., Physical Conditioning-Speed and Agility in Youth Football. Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport/Science, Movement and Health, 2018. 18(1): p. 80-85.https://analefefs.ro/anale-fefs/2018/i1/peautori/TEODOR%20Dragos%20Florin.p
18. Young, W.B., B. Dawson, and G.J. Henry, Agility and change-of-direction speed are independent skills: Implications for training for agility in invasion sports. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2015. 10(1): p. 159-169. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/1747-9541.10.1.159
19. Lichtenstein, E., et al., Validity and reliability of a novel integrative motor performance testing course for seniors: The “Agility Challenge for the Elderly (ACE)”. Frontiers in physiology, 2019. 10: p. 44.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2019.00044/full
20. Zouhal H, Abderrahman AB, Dupont G, Truptin P, Le Bris R, Le Postec E, Sghaeir Z, Brughelli M, Granacher U, Bideau B. Effects of Neuromuscular Training on Agility Performance in Elite Soccer Players. Front Physiol. 2019 Jul 23; 10:947. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00947. PMID: 31396107; PMCID: PMC6664050.
21. Cao Y, Zhang C, Guo R, Zhang D, Wang S. Performances of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA), and validity of timing components in comparison with three commonly used agility tests in Chinese boys: an exploratory study. PeerJ. 2020 Mar 23;8: e8784. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8784. PMID: 32231883; PMCID: PMC7098388.
22. Pojskic H, Pagaduan J, Uzicanin E, Separovic V, Spasic M, Foretic N, Sekulic D. Reliability, Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task. J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Nov 19;18(4):623-635. PMID: 31827346; PMCID: PMC6873124.
23. Afyon, Y.A., O. Mulazimoglu, and A. Boyaci, The effects of core trainings on speed and agility skills of soccer players. International Journal of Sports Science, 2017. 7(6):p.239244.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdurrahman
24. Azmi, K. and N.W. Kusnanik. Effect of exercise program Speed, Agility, and Quickness (SAQ) in improving speed, agility, and acceleration. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012043/meta
25. Tajik, M., M.A. Azarbayjani, and M. Peeri, A Review of Reactive and Non-reactive Agility Tests Concerning Neurologic Aspects. Thrita, 2022. 11https://brieflands.com/articles/thrita-129744.html
26. Latorre EC, Zuniga MD, Arriaza E, Moya F, Nikulin C. Automatic Registration of Footsteps in Contact Regions for Reactive Agility Training in Sports. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;20(6):1709. doi: 10.3390/s20061709. PMID: 32204336; PMCID: PMC7146740.
27. Trajković N, Gušić M, Molnar S, Mačak D, Madić DM, Bogataj Š. Short-Term FIFA 11+ Improves Agility and Jump Performance in Young Soccer Players. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 18;17(6):2017. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062017. PMID: 32197538; PMCID: PMC7142544.
28. Walker, S. and A. Turner, A one-day field test battery for the assessment of aerobic capacity, anaerobic capacity, speed, and agility of soccer players. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 2009. 31(6): p. 52-60. https://journals.lww.com/nsca scj/Fulltext/2009/12000/A_One_Day_Field_Test_Battery_for_the_Assessment_of.8.aspx
29. A, Ciccarelli A, Buonsenso A, Calcagno G, di Cagno A. Isoinertial Eccentric-Overload Training in Young Soccer Players: Effects on Strength, Sprint, Change of Direction, Agility and Soccer Shooting Precision. J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Feb 24;19(1):213-223. PMID: 32132845; PMCID: PMC7039027.
30. Hammami M, Negra Y, Shephard RJ, Chelly MS. The Effect of Standard Strength vs. Contrast Strength Training on the Development of Sprint, Agility, Repeated Change of Direction, and Jump in Junior Male Soccer Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):901-912. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001815. PMID: 28328713.
31. Longmuir PE, Boyer C, Lloyd M, Borghese MM, Knight E, Saunders TJ, Boiarskaia E, Zhu W, Tremblay MS. Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA): Validity, objectivity, and reliability evidence for children 8-12 years of age. J Sport Health Sci. 2017 Jun;6(2):231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 11. PMID: 30356598; PMCID: PMC6189007.
