تأثیر دوره¬های آموزش مجازی دانشگاه‌ها و مؤسسات غیرانتفاعی بر توسعه دانش
محورهای موضوعی :
1 - دانشگاه علوم انتظامی امین
کلید واژه: یادگیری الکترونیک, آموزش الکترونیک, فناوری اطلاعات, توسعه دانش.,
چکیده مقاله :
امروزه یادگیری مجازی به‌عنوان رویکردی نوین در مرحله رشد و تکامل قرار دارد و مطالعه عوامل مرتبط با این گونه یادگیری ها و نتایج برآمده از آن‌ها می‌تواند بر ارتقای کیفیت یادگیری و یاددهی در دانشگاه‌ها بیفزاید. پژوهش حاضر باهدف تأثیر دوره های آموزش مجازی دانشگاه‌ها و مؤسسات غیرانتفاعی بر توسعه دانش (موردمطالعه موسسه آموزش عالی شهاب دانش) انجام‌شده است. تحقیق در گروه تحقیقات توصیفی، پیمایشی قرار می‌گیرد و ازنظر هدف کاربردی است. روش اجرای پژوهش پیمایشی و ابزار مورداستفاده برای جمع آوری داده ها پرسشنامه است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق 4000 نفرازدانشجویان موسسه آموزش عالی شهاب دانش می‌باشد که با استفاده از جدول مورگان 351 نفر از بین دانشجویان به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب‌شده‌اند. روش نمونه گیری بکار رفته در این پژوهش تصادفی طبقه ای می‌باشد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها به‌وسیله نرم‌افزار آماري اس پی اس انجام شده است. براي اثبات فرضيات تحقيق از آزمون t مستقل استفاده شده است. بر اساس نتایج آزمون‌های انجام‌شده در سطح معناداری 05/0 فرضیه اصلی تحقیق مورد تائید قرارگرفته است و مشخص شد که دوره های آموزش مجازی بر توسعه دانش و از نظر محتوا، سازمان‌دهی مواد آموزشی، انعطاف‌پذیری، حجم کاری و روش‌های ارزشیابی، عناصر فعالیت‌های یاددهی ـ یادگیری، بازخورد ارائه‌شده، کمک رسانی به دانشجویان و توانایی ایجاد انگیزه به دانشجویان، اثربخش است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که کاربرد فناوری اطلاعات و توسعه آموزش مجازی در موسسه موردمطالعه، در یادگیری و آموزش دانشجویان تأثیرگذار است.
Nowadays, virtual learning as a new approach is in the development stage and studies on this related learning and also result of them can increase the quality of learning and teaching in the universities. This study is done with the reach of the impact the education of courses on the virtual universities and nonprofit institutes. This research is in the Descriptive survey group and in terms of goals it is functional. The method of the procedure is survey and, questionnaire is used for data collection. The population of this study is 4000 students who studied in the Shahab Danesh institute. 351 students were selected randomly by Morgan table. The employed method is stratified random sample. The data analyzed by statistical software Spss and for proving the hypotheses independent T test were used. The results of tests confirmed at a significance level of 0.05 from basic hypotheses and it was found that virtual education courses effect on the development of knowledge in universities and nonprofits and also for-profit universities and institutes of learning in content, organizing course material, flexibility, workload and evaluation methods, elements of teaching and learning, presented feedback, helping and motivating students. The results proved that the use of information technology and the development of virtual education in universities and higher education institutions, especially the Institute of that we study, affects in teaching and learning of students
1. Guragain N. E-learning benefits and applications .2016; 44 + 1, appendix.
2. Hong JC, Tai KH, Hwang MY, KuoY C, & Chen JS. Internet cognitive failure relevant tousers' satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use. a government e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior.2017;66: 353-362.
3. Maseleno A, Sabani N, Huda M, Ahmad R, Jasmi KA, Basiron B. Demystifying Learning Analytics in Personalised Learning. International Journal of Engineering & Technology.2018; 7 (3):1124-1129.
4. Dascalu MI, Bodea CN, Tesila B, Moldoveanu A, de Pablos PO. How social and semantic technologies can sustain employability through knowledge development and positive. behavioral changes. Computers in Human Behavior.2017; 70, 507-517.
5. Kong SC, Looi CK, Chan TW, Huang R. Teacher development in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Beijing for e-Learning in school education. Journal of Computers in Education.2017;4 (1): 5-25.
6. Hillier M. Bridging the digital divide with off-line e-learning. Distance ducation.2018; 39(1): 110.121.
7. Tarhini A, Hone K, Liu X, Tarhini T. Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments.2017; 25(3):306-328.
8. El-Masri M, Tarhini A. Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational.Technology Research and Development.2017; 65(3): 743-763.
9. ParkesT, Mitchell, Sarah، Stein, Christine. Reading Student preparedness for university e-learning environments The Internet and Higher Education,2015; 25: 1-10.
10. Zarif s, Nahid. Examining the Efficacy Quality Measures of Electronic Learning in Higher Education, 2010; 3, 24-32.
11. Russel TL. The no significant difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications. 1999; North Carolina University.
12. Mayer R. Using multimedia for e-learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.2017;10:1111-12197.
13. Ebadi R. E-learning and education. 2004.Tehran: Aftab Mehr.
14. Agrawal V, Agrawal A, Agarwal S, "Assessment of factors for e-learning: an empirical investigation", Industrial and Commercial Training. 2016; 48(8),409-415.
15. Rahmani J, Movahedinya N, Salimi G. Conceptual Model of Teaching and Educational Roles of Information and Communication Technology in Education, Knowledge and Research in Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch. 2006; Tenth and Eleventh:66-49
16. Fathiejarehghah K, Pardakhtychi MH, Rabiei M. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Virtual Education Courses in Iran's Higher Education System (Case Study: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad), Information & Communication Technology Quarterly in Educational Sciences. 2011; 4: 21 5.
17. SalehiAmiri R, Heidarizadeh E. The Effect of Information and Communication Technology on Educational and Cultural Development, Strategic Research Institute. 2007; 15:111.
18. Khan HU. Use Of E-Learning Tools to Solve Group Work Problems In Higher Education: A Case Study Of Gulf Country. Advances in Computer Science: an International Journal2013; 2(3): 90-96.
19. Maleki S. Information Technology in Education. 2009. Journal of Jihad University
20. Pates، Dominic، Sumner, Neal. E-learning spaces and the digital university", The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology.2016; 33, 3:159-171.
21. Norouzi M, Zandi F, MosesMadani, F. Improvement of Information Technology Methods in the Process of Teaching-Learning of Schools, Quarterly Educational Innovations .2008; 26:16 -17.
22. Sheikhzadeh M, Mehremohammadi M. Primary Mathematics Education Software Based on Constructivist Approach and Measuring Its Effectiveness, Computer Science Research Center, Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations. 2004. Third Year: 9.
23. Ewan W, McDonald, Jessica L, Boulton, Jacqueline L, Davis.E-learning and nursing assessment skills and knowledge – An integrative review Nurse Education Today.2018; 66: 166-174.
24. Wander RM, Seiji I, Luiz E Z. Educational Data Mining: A review of evaluation process in the e-learning Telematics and Informatics.2018; 35, 6: 1701-1717.
25. Abdullah A, Jennifer R. E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students Computers & Education.2018; 127:1-12.
26. AbuSneineh W, Zairi M. An evaluation framework for e-learning effectiveness in the Arab world. International Encyclopedia of Education. 2010; (Third Edition): 521-535. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ referenceworks/9780080448947.
27. Fariborzi E, Bakar K, bt A. Factors influencing the effectiveness of courses in Iranian university e-learning centers. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society.2010; 6(1): 72-80.
28. Khorasani A, Abdolmaleki J, Zahedi H. Factors Affecting Admission to E-learning in Tehran University Students Based on Technology Acceptance Model, Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011; (6): 673.
29. Akhghar B, Naserzadeh SMR, Tabatabaee F. A Proposing a Comprehensive Model of Electronic Learner Satisfaction Path; Case Study: Mehralborz University, Journal of Information Technology Management. 2011; 3.9: 1-20.
30. Enayati Novinfar A, Yousefi Afrashteh M, Sayami L, Javaheri, daneshmand M. Evaluation of the Quality of Educational Services of Payame Noor University of Hamadan Based on Sarvakal Model, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2011; 17, 3: 151 135.
31. Yazdani F, Ebrahimzadeh I, Zandi B, AliPour A, Zare H. Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Electronic Learning System of the Virtual College of Hadith Sciences, Modern Thinking Ideas.2010; 6, 3, 183: 137.
32. Salari MM, Yaghmaei F, Mehdizadeh S, Faithful Z، Afzali M. Factors Related to Adoption of E-Learning by Nursing Students, Journal of Educational Strategies. 2009; 2, 3:108- 103.
33. SeyyedTaghavi, MA. Student and faculty attitude towards e-learning: A Survey on E-learning Universities in Iran, University of Management and Industrial Engineering. 2006; Malek Ashtar University of Technology.
34. Asadi A, Karimi A. Effective Structures on Application of Information Technology (IT) by Educators of Scientific-Applied Educational Centers. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2007; 2-38, 2.
35. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities”, Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970.
36. Hosam Al-Samarraie, Bee Kim Teng, Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani, Nasser Alalwan. E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students, Studies in Higher Education.2017; DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088.
37. Pollard, RP. ConstanceResearch Priorities in Educational Technology: A Delphi Study”, Jornal of Reserch on Technology in Education.2005.
