بررسی تصفیه‌پذیری فاضلاب خمیروکاغذ با استفاده از روش تصفیه ترکیبی اولترافیلتراسیون و فنتون
محورهای موضوعی : تکنولوژی آب و فاضلاب
نیلوفر عابدین زاده
1
,
علیرضا پنداشته
2
,
فریبا استوار
3
1 - پژوهشکده محیط زیست جهاددانشگاهی
2 - عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه گیلان
3 - پژوهشکده محیط زیست جهاددانشگاهی
کلید واژه: فیلتراسیون غشایی فاضلاب خمیروکاغذاکسیداسیون فنتون راندمان حذف,
چکیده مقاله :
در این مطالعه تصفیه‌پذیری فاضلاب خمیر و کاغذ با استفاده از روش ترکیبی (اولترافیلتراسیون و فنتون) و در مقیاس آزمایشگاهی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. ابتدا اثر فیلتراسیون غشایی بر روی حذف کدورت و COD، همچنین شار غشایی و درصد گرفتگی غشا مورد بررسی قرار گرفت، سپس جهت تصفیه تکمیلی و افزایش راندمان حذف آلایندهها از روش اکسیداسیون شیمیایی پیشرفته استفاده گردید. در انتهای عملیات فیلتراسیون میزان کدورت با راندمان حذف % 99، تقریبا به صفر رسید. براساس نتایج حاصله میانگین COD خروجی از فرآیند فیلتراسیون با 8/41% حذف بود. تحت شرایط بهینه فشار bar1، میزان شار غشایی در شستشوی معکوس اول برابر با L.m-2.h-1 99/1 بود، که این میزان پس از شستشوی معکوس چهارم به L.m-2.h-126/1 رسید. فرایند فنتون، mg/L COD 5/862 را از فاضلاب پیش تصفیه شده با غشای UF با دوز بهینه 5/1میلی مول در لیتر آهن دو ظرفیتی و 6 میلی‌مول در لیتر پراکسید هیدروژن در pH اولیه 3 و در یک زمان واکنش 17 دقیقه‌ای حذف می‌نماید. در این شرایط راندمان حذف COD، BOD5 و رنگ به ترتیب برابر با% 2/95 ،% 3/90 و %1/92 به‌دست می‌آید که این نتایج راندمان بالای روش اکسیداسیون پیشرفته جهت حذف ترکیبات آلاینده در فاضلاب خمیر و کاغذ را نشان می‌دهد.
In this study, the treatability of pulp and paper wastewater has been studied using a combined method (ultrafiltration and fenton) in a laboratory scale. First, the effect of membrane filtration on the removal of turbidity and COD, as well as membrane flux and membrane fouling were investigated, and then the advanced oxidation method was used to supplement the treatment and increase the removal efficiency of the pollutants. At the end of the membrane filtration operation, the removal efficiency of turbidity was 99%. Based on the results, the average COD of the filtration process with 41.8% removal efficiency was 906 mg/ l. Under optimal pressure conditions bar-1, the amount of membrane flux in the first backwash was equal to 1/99 L.m-2.h-1 which this amount reached to 1/26 L.m-2.h-1after the fourth backwash. the Fenton process removed 862/5 mg /L COD from the pretreated wastewater by UF membrane with an optimal dose of 1.5 mM for Fe +2 and 6 mM for a hydrogen peroxide at an initial pH of 3 and at a 17minute reaction time .In these conditions, the removal efficiency of COD, BOD5 and color was 95%, 90.3% and 92.1% respectively, These results shows high efficiency of the advanced oxidation process to remove contaminants in pulp and paper wastewater
1.Covinich LG, Bengoechea DI, Fenoglio RJ, Advanced oxidation Processes for wastewater treatment in pulp and paper industry, American Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2014; 4. (3): 56-70.
2. Ginni G, Adishkumar S, Rajesh Banu J, Yogalakshmi N. Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater by solar Photo-Fenton process. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2014; 52:457–2464.
3. Khansorthong S, Hunsom M., Remediation of wastewater from pulp andpaper mill industry by electro chemical technique. Chem. Eng. J. 2009; 151, 228–234.
4. Birjandi N, Younesi H, Bahramifar N. Treatment of wastewater effluentsfrom paper recycling plants by coagulation process and optimization of treat-ment conditions with response surface methodology. Appl. Water Sci. 2014;6 (4):339–348.
5.Zahrim A.Y, Gilbert ML, Janaun J.treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent using photo-Fenton’s process. Journal of applied science. 2007 ;7(15):21 64-67.
6.Kamali M. Khodaparast Z.. Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014; 114:326-342.
7. Buyukkamaci N. and Koken, E.. Economic evaluation of alternative wastewater treatment plant options for pulp and paper industry. Science of the Total Environment. 2010; 408: 6070 – 6078.
8. Manttari M, Viitikko K, Nystrom M. Nanofiltration of biologically treated effluents from the pulp and paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 2006; 272:152–160.
9. Manttari,M. Kuosa, M. Kallas, J. Nystrom,M .(2008). Membrane filtration and ozone treatment of biologically treated effluents from the pulp and paper industry Journal of Membrane Science .Vol 309. 112–119
10. Maartens, A., Jacobs, E.P. Swart, P. (2002). UF of pulp and paper effluent: membrane fouling-prevention and cleaning. Journal of Membrane Science.Vol 09. 81–92.
11. Pizzichini, M. Russo, C. Di Meo, C. (2005). Purification of pulp and paper wastewater, with membrane technology, for water reuse in a closed loop. Desalination. Vol 178 . 351-359
12. Hong Y-S, Zhou H, Zytner R. Combining ultrafiltration process with coagulation pretreatment for pulp mill wastewater treatmen t. Environmental technology. 2007;28:995-100
13. Sweity, A. Oren, Y. Ronen, Z. Herzberg, M. (2013). the influence of antiscalants on biofouling of RO membranes in seawater desalination. Water research Vol 15.No 47(10).3389-98.
14. Madaeni, S. and Samieirad, S. (2010). Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membrane fouled by wastewater. Desalination .Vol 257. 80–86.
15. Gholami, M. Abbasi Souraki, B. Pendashteh, A. and Bagherian Marzouni, M. (2016). Efficiency evaluation of the membrane/AOPs for paper mill wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology.Vol 38. No 9.1127-1138.
16. Li, M. Lu, J. Heijman, B. and Rietveld, L. (2012). Effect of cake layer characteristics on fouling control in long time filtration without backwash for submerged ceramic MF membrane in surface water treatment. Delft University of Technology. The Netherlands.
17. Kovasin, K. (2003). Modeling ultrafiltration and filtration phenomena applied in chemical pulping processes, Helsinki University of Technology.
18.Wijmans, J. Nakao, S. Smolders, C. (1984). Flux limitation in ultrafiltration: osmotic pressure model and gel layer model, Journal of Membrane Science. Vol 20. 115-124.
19. Tang, C.Y. Fu, Q.S. Criddle, C.S. and Leckie, J.O.( 2007).Effect of flux (trans membrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater. Environmental science & technology. Vol 41. 2008-2014.
20. Madaeni, S. and Mansourpanah, Y. (2003). COD removal from concentrated wastewater using membranes, Filtration & separation. Vol 40. 40-46.
21. Castelblanque, J. and Salimbeni, F. (1999). Application of membrane systems for COD removal and reuse of wastewater from anaerobic digestors, Desalination. Vol126. 293-300.
22. Oliveira, CR.Silva, CM. and Milanez, AF. (2007).Application of ultrafiltration in the pulp and paper industry: metals removal and whitewater reuse. Water science technology. Vol 55.6.117-123
23. Zaidi, H. Buisson, S. Sourirajan, and H. Wood. (1992). Ultra-and nano-filtration in advanced effluent treatment schemes for pollution control in the pulp and paper industry. Water Science & Technology. Vol 25. 263-276.
24. Thompson, M. A. (2001). Membrane filtration of high turbidity sources. Water Supply.Vol1, 325-330.
25.Lin, J. Chun-Te. Chen, J.-J. Lee, D-J. and Guo, W-M. (2012). Treating high-turbidity storm water by coagulation-membrane process, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers.Vol 43. 291-294.
26. Nguyen, B.T. (2012). Influence of membrane fouling on the removal of pharmaceutical, Master's dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Sanitation.
27. Gonder, Z.B. Arayici, S. Barlas, H. (2012). Treatment of Pulp and Paper Mill Wastewater Using Utrafiltration Process: Optimization of the Fouling and Rejections. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. Vol 51. 6184-6195.
29. Benitez, F.J. Acero, J.L. Real, F.J. Rubio, F.J. and Leal, A.I. (2001). The role of hydroxyl radicals for the decomposition of p-hydroxy phenylacetic acid in aqueous Solutions. Water Research .Vol 35. 1338–1343.
30. Meric, S. Kaptan, D. and Olmez, T. (2004). Color and COD removal from wastewater Containing Reactive Black 5 using Fenton’s oxidation process. Chemosphere. Vol3.435– 441.
31. Lee, H. and Shoda, M. (2008). Removal of COD and color from livestock wastewater by the Fenton method. Journal of Hazardous Materials.Vol 153. No 3.1314-1319.
32. Toney, MA. Purcell, P.J. Zaho, Y.Q. Tayeb, A.M. and El-sherbini.M.F. (2009). Photo-catalytic degradation of an oil-water emulsion using the photo-fenton treatment process: Effects and statistical optimization.Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A. Vol 44.No 2.
33. Brink, A. Sheridan, C.M and Harding, K.G. (2011). The Fenton oxidation of biologically treated paper and pulp mill effluents: Performance and kinetic study. ProcessSaf Environ. Prot. 2011; 107, 206–215.
34.Sonune, A. and Ghate, R. (2004). Developments in wastewater treatment methods. Desalination.Vol 167.55-63.
35. Ghidossi, R. Veyret, D. and Moulin, P. (2006). Computational fluid dynamics applied to membranes: State of the art and opportunities, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. Vol 45. 437-454.
36. Neyens, E. and Baeyens, J. (2003). A review of classic Fenton’s peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique, Journal of Hazardous Materials B98.33–50
37. Cajal-Mariñosa. Mononen, T. Fiskari, J. Tuhkanen, T. (2012). A novel concept for monitoring AOX and DOC removal during Fenton treatment of bleached Kraft pulp mill effluents. Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry of Southern Africa Journal (TAPPSAJ). Vol 3.23-27.
