هرمنوتیک خود فوکو: چارچوبی برای تبارشناسی اخلاق جنسی
محورهای موضوعی : Research in Theoritical Politics
مهدی سلطانی گردفرامرزی
1
,
محمدجواد غلامرضا کاشی
2
,
قباد منصوربخت
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری رشته ایرانشناسی، بنیاد ایرانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشیار، گروه تاریخ، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: هرمنوتیک خود, تبارشناسی سوژه, تکنولوژی خود, آزمون خود و اعتراف.,
چکیده مقاله :
مباحث متأخر میشل فوکو در دهه ۱۹۸۰ نشاندهنده چرخشی اساسی از تمرکز صرف بر تبارشناسی گفتمانهای قدرت - دانش به تحلیل شیوههای سوژه شدن در قالب آنچه او «هرمنوتیک خود» مینامد، است. این پژوهش نظری با تمرکز بر مفهوم هرمنوتیک خود میکوشد بنیانهای نظری و ظرفیتهای تحلیلی آن را در پیوند با تبارشناسی اخلاق جنسی روشن سازد. فوکو نشان میدهد که تکنیکهای خود در سنتهای باستانی، مانند «آزمون خود» مبتنی بر یادآوری قواعد و در مسیحیت مانند «اعتراف» بهمثابه رمزگشایی از حقیقت درونی، چگونه فرد را به بازشناسی خویشتن به منزله سوژۀ اخلاقی و جنسی هدایت کردند. تحلیل این تکنیکها آشکار میسازد که سوژه نه یک موجودیت ثابت و پیشینی، بلکه برساختهای تاریخی است که در تعامل میان قدرت، دانش و شیوههای مراقبت از خویشتن شکل میگیرد. مقاله نشان میدهد که هرمنوتیک خود بهمثابه رویکرد نظری، علاوه بر توضیح تحول تجربه جنسی در غرب، پتانسیل بالایی برای مطالعۀ تاریخی و گفتمانی اخلاق جنسی در بستر ایرانی دارد. بنابراین مقاله حاضر با ارائه خوانشی نوآورانه از هرمنوتیک خود، چشماندازی تازه برای مطالعات ایرانی فراهم میکند و امکان بررسی دوباره مناسبات قدرت، حقیقت و اخلاق جنسی را در تاریخ فرهنگی ایران مهیا میسازد.
Foucault's Hermeneutics of the Self: A Framework
for the Genealogy of Sexual Ethics
Mahdi Soltani Gordfaramarzi*
Mohammad Javad Gholamreza Kashi**
Ghobad Mansourbakht***
Michel Foucault’s later discussions in the 1980s represent a fundamental shift from a sole focus on the genealogy of power–knowledge discourses to the analysis of modes of subjectivation in what he terms the “hermeneutics of the self.” This theoretical study, focusing on the concept of the hermeneutics of the self, seeks to clarify its theoretical foundations and analytical capacities in relation to the genealogy of sexual ethics. Foucault demonstrates how self-techniques in ancient traditions, such as the “test of the self” based on the recollection of rules, and in Christianity, such as “confession” as a decoding of inner truth, guided the individual toward self-recognition as an ethical and sexual subject. Analysis of these techniques reveals that the subject is not a fixed, pre-existing entity but a historical construct formed in the interaction between power, knowledge, and practices of self-care. The article shows that the hermeneutics of the self, as a theoretical approach, not only explains the transformation of sexual experience in the West but also holds significant potential for the historical and discursive study of sexual ethics in the Iranian context. Accordingly, this article offers an innovative reading of the hermeneutics of the self, providing a new perspective for Iranian studies and enabling a reconsideration of the relations among power, truth, and sexual ethics in Iran’s cultural history.
Keywords: Hermeneutics of the self, genealogy of the subject, technologies of the self, test of the self, confession.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Michel Foucault’s late intellectual project, which took shape primarily in the final decade of his life, signals a decisive shift in his critical inquiry into power, knowledge, and subjectivity. Whereas Foucault’s earlier works, within the frameworks of archaeology and genealogy, were largely concerned with the historical examination of discursive formations, institutional practices, and disciplinary mechanisms, his later writings and lectures increasingly focus on the ethical dimension of subjectivity. This shift finds its most explicit expression in the concept of the “hermeneutics of the self,” a concept that refers to specific historical modes through which individuals are invited, obliged, or compelled to interpret themselves as subjects of truth. This turn toward ethics does not represent a rupture with Foucault’s earlier analyses of power, but rather an internal transformation of his critical method—one that makes possible a more comprehensive genealogy of ethical and sexual subjectivity.
This article argues that the hermeneutics of the self occupies a central yet under-theorized position within the overall architecture of Foucault’s thought. The concept functions as a theoretical hinge between archaeology, genealogy, and ethics, providing an indispensable framework for understanding how subjects are constituted not only through external constraints but also through active practices of relating to themselves. From this perspective, sexual ethics cannot be understood solely through juridical models of prohibition, repression, or moral normativity; rather, it must be conceived as a historical and contingent field of ethical problematization in which individuals come to recognize themselves as sexual subjects through practices of self-examination, confession, discipline, and ethical reflection.
Research Background
The article first situates the hermeneutics of the self within the broader trajectory of Foucault’s intellectual development. From his early studies of madness, medicine, and the human sciences to his genealogical analyses of discipline, biopolitics, and governmentality, Foucault consistently challenged essentialist and universalist conceptions of the human subject. In Discipline and Punish and the first volume of The History of Sexuality, he demonstrated how modern subjects are produced through disciplinary techniques and regulatory mechanisms that operate at both the individual and population levels. Yet these works left partially open a fundamental question: how individuals actively participate in the process of their own subjectivation. Foucault’s later lectures and writings address precisely this issue, redirecting attention to the ethical practices through which subjects establish their relationship to truth.
Theoretical Approach
At the core of this inquiry lies the concept of “technologies of the self,” which refers to the ways in which individuals act upon their bodies, thoughts, conduct, and modes of being in order to transform themselves in accordance with particular ethical ideals. The hermeneutics of the self denotes a specific configuration of these technologies in which the “self” becomes an object of interpretation and disclosure. Foucault explicitly rejects the idea of an inner, pre-discursive self waiting to be discovered. For him, subjectivity is the historical product of practices that link truth-telling, power relations, and ethical obligation. Accordingly, the self is neither an autonomous essence nor merely an effect of domination, but rather the outcome of historically contingent forms of exercising power over oneself.
Method
Methodologically, the article adopts a theoretical and interpretive approach rooted in Foucauldian genealogy. Rather than presenting an empirical study, it reconstructs a conceptual framework capable of guiding genealogical analyses of sexual ethics across different historical and cultural contexts. Genealogy, in this sense, does not seek origins or linear developments, but instead focuses on ruptures, transformations, and contingent formations of ethical subjectivity. The primary sources include Foucault’s works, lectures, and interviews, alongside a critical engagement with secondary literature in philosophy, social theory, and gender studies.
Findings
A substantial portion of the article is devoted to a comparative analysis of ethical subjectivity in Greco-Roman philosophy and early Christianity. Drawing on Foucault’s readings of Stoic, Epicurean, medical, and early Christian texts, the article demonstrates how different regimes of truth produce distinct configurations of ethical and sexual subjectivity. In Greek ethics, sexual conduct was primarily problematized in terms of moderation, balance, and self-mastery. Practices such as self-examination, meditation, and mnemonic exercises were oriented toward the recollection and stabilization of ethical principles, rather than the interpretation of inner desire. The ethical subject produced within this framework may be described as an ascetic subject—a subject who orders sexual conduct through rational discipline rather than through confession or continuous self-disclosure.
Early Christianity introduced a fundamental transformation in this ethical configuration. Through practices such as confession, obedience, spiritual guidance, and the constant scrutiny of thoughts, Christianity established a hermeneutic regime in which the self became a permanent object of suspicion and interpretation. Sexual desire was no longer merely a matter of conduct, but became a privileged site of truth requiring continual interpretation and articulation. The obligation to disclose one’s inner thoughts and desires to an external authority transformed the ethical subject into a being whose moral status depended on the articulation of hidden truth. The article argues that this Christian hermeneutics of the self constituted a decisive historical rupture in the genealogy of sexual ethics, profoundly reshaping Western moral experience and laying the groundwork for modern techniques of normalization and self-surveillance.
On the basis of this historical analysis, the article shows that modern sexuality is not a natural or biological given, but a discursive and ethical construction. Modern scientific, psychiatric, pedagogical, and psychological discourses have inherited Christian confessional techniques in secularized form, transforming them into methods of examination, diagnosis, and normalization. Individuals are encouraged to interpret their desires, identities, and behaviors through expert knowledge, thereby constituting themselves as sexual subjects. The hermeneutics of the self enables a critical understanding of these processes by revealing how ethical relations to oneself become subtle mechanisms of power that operate not through overt coercion, but through voluntary self-scrutiny.
The article also addresses major critiques directed at Foucault’s later work, particularly accusations of moral relativism, individualism, and political quietism. Critics have argued that the hermeneutics of the self lacks a normative foundation and reduces ethics to individualized practices of self-fashioning. In response, the article demonstrates that Foucault’s project is not normative but diagnostic: the hermeneutics of the self offers a critical ontology of the present that reveals the historical conditions under which particular forms of ethical subjectivity acquire authority. Far from depoliticizing ethics, this framework shows how power operates precisely through practices that appear voluntary, internalized, and self-governing.
The article further clarifies the relationship between the hermeneutics of the self and Foucault’s analysis of governmentality. Ethical practices of relating to oneself do not operate in a vacuum, but are embedded within broader regimes of governance that seek to guide conduct through freedom rather than coercion. By compelling individuals to assume ethical and sexual responsibility for themselves, the hermeneutics of the self becomes a technology of governance that aligns individual self-understanding with dominant regimes of truth and morality. This dynamic is particularly salient in modern sexual ethics, where regulation increasingly takes place through discourses of choice, responsibility, self-care, and authenticity.
Moreover, the article advances a methodological intervention by foregrounding ethical practices of the self as a central site for genealogical analysis. By shifting the focus from institutional norms and official discourses to the micropolitics of ethical self-relations, it becomes possible to gain a more precise understanding of how sexual ethics operates at the level of everyday conduct and moral reflection. Ethical subjectivity thus appears not as a secondary effect, but as a pivotal mechanism at the intersection of power, knowledge, and subjectivity.
Finally, the article explores the applicability of the hermeneutics of the self beyond Western historical contexts. Although Foucault’s empirical analyses are largely confined to Greco-Roman and Christian traditions, his conceptual framework can be productively employed to study non-Western ethical regimes. Iranian and Islamic traditions—particularly practices of ethical self-examination, ascetic discipline, mystical self-cultivation, and juridical–ethical regulation—can be analyzed as technologies of the self that establish distinct relationships between truth, authority, and subjectivity. This approach avoids both cultural essentialism and simplistic universalism, offering instead a historically grounded and context-sensitive genealogy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the article argues that the hermeneutics of the self constitutes one of the most fundamental and theoretically fertile dimensions of Foucault’s critical project. By shifting the analytical focus from repression and law to practices of self-formation and truth-telling, this framework enables a powerful genealogy of sexual ethics. Sexual ethics, from this perspective, is not merely the imposition of external norms, but the active product of ethical relations that individuals establish with themselves. By clarifying the conceptual status of the hermeneutics of the self and demonstrating its applicability in comparative and historical studies, the article makes a theoretical contribution to Foucauldian studies, ethics, and sexuality.
Refrences
Afary, J., & Anderson, K. B. (2005) Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the seductions of Islamism. University of Chicago Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994) The location of culture. Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (2013) The posthuman. Polity Press.
Butler, J. (2021) Giving an account of oneself revisited: Ethics, vulnerability, and critique. Fordham University Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Deleuze, G. (1988) Foucault. University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1970) The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Pantheon Books.
--------------- (1972) The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
--------------- (1984) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.) , The Foucault reader (pp. 76–100). Pantheon Books.
-------------- (1985) The history of sexuality, volume 2: The use of pleasure. Vintage Books.
-------------- (1986) The history of sexuality, volume 3: The care of the self. Vintage Books.
-------------- (1995) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
-------------- (2016) About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Lectures at Dartmouth College, 1980. University of Chicago Press.
-------------- (2018) The history of sexuality, volume 4: Confessions of the flesh. Pantheon Books.
Gannon, M. J. (2002) Cultural metaphors: Their use in management practice and as a method for understanding cultures. Advances in International Management, 14, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-7929(02)14013-0
Gamez, P. (2023) Inhuman hermeneutics of the self: Biopolitics in the age of big data. Foucault Studies, (34), 80–110. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.i34.6939
Gutmann, J. (1988) Rousseau’s and Foucault’s “technologies of the self.” In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.) , Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 99–116). University of Massachusetts Press.
Habermas, J. (1987) The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. MIT Press.
Hayles, K. N. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Koopman, C. (2019) How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. University of Chicago Press.
McNay, L. (1994) Foucault and feminism: Power, gender and the self. Polity Press.
Mills, S. (2003) Michel Foucault. Routledge.
* Corresponding Author: Ph.D. Student of Iranology, Shahid Beheshti University, Iranology Foundation, Tehran, Iran.
0009-0006-2213-3260
**Associate professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
0000-0002-8952-370X
***Associate Professor, Department of History, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
0000-0003-1475-0008
اسمارت، بری (1385) میشل فوکو، ترجمه لیلا جوافشانی و حسن چاوشیان، تهران، اختران.
دريفوس، هيوبرت و پل رابینو (1394) میشل فوکو: فراسوی ساختارگرایی و هرمنوتیک، ترجمه حسین بشیریه، تهران، نشرنی.
دلوز، ژیل (1386) فوکو، ترجمه نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران، نشرنی.
رضوانیان، قدسیه و سورن ستارزاده (1403) «سوژهمندی سیاسی و هرمنوتیک خود در شعر شاملو»، دوفصلنامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه خوارزمی، سال سی¬ودوم، شماره 96، صص 209-234.
doi: 10.61186/jpll.32.96.209.
شاطیزاده ملکشاهی، امیررضا و دیگران (1403) «بررسی تبارشناسانه و مسئلهمندانه سوژه در نسبت با تاریخ سوژهمندی و تکنیکهای خود در اندیشه فوکو»، شناخت، سال هفدهم، شماره 1 (پیاپی 89)، صص 91-113.
doi: 10.48308/kj.2024.236434.1264.
فوکو، میشل (1392) تولد پزشکی بالینی، ترجمه فاطمه ولیانی، تهران، ماهی.
--------- (1382) تاریخ جنون، ترجمه فاطمه ولیانی، تهران، هرمس.
--------- (1403) مراقبت و تنبیه، ترجمه نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران، نشرنی.
--------- (1384) اراده به دانستن، ترجمه نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران، نشرنی.
--------- (1400) تئاتر فلسفه، ترجمه نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران، نشرنی.
-------- (1389) نظم اشیا: دیرینهشناسی علوم انسانی، ترجمه یحیی امامی، تهران، پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و انسانی.
--------- (1396) دیرینهشناسی دانش، ترجمه نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران، نشرنی.
--------- (1394) تولد زیستسیاست، ترجمه رضا نجفزاده، تهران، نشرنی.
--------- (1395) خاستگاه هرمنوتیک خود، ترجمه نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده، تهران، نشرنی.
ممبینی، سجاد (1399الف) «آیا هرمنوتیک خود امری مرضی است؟ (یک سمپتومشناسی در کار فوکو)»، غربشناسی بنیادی، سال یازدهم، شماره 2، صص 123-141.
https://doi.org/10.30465/os.2021.36153.1708.
----------- (1399ب) «سمپتومشناسی هرمنوتیک خود در مدرنیسم ادبی»، جامعهشناسی هنر و ادبیات، سال یازدهم، شماره 1، صص 121-142.
doi: 10.22059/JSAL.2021.322359.666009. مشایخی، عادل (1395) تبارشناسی خاکستری است، تهران، ناهید. میلز، سارا (1382) گفتمان، ترجمه فتاح محمدی، تهران، هزاره سوم. یورگنسن، ماریانه و لوئیز فیلیپس (1389) نظریه و روش در تحلیل گفتمان، ترجمه هادی جلیلی، تهران، نشرنی. Afary, J., & Anderson, K. B. (2005) Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the seductions of Islamism. University of Chicago Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994) The location of culture. Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (2013) The posthuman. Polity Press.
Butler, J. (2021) Giving an account of oneself revisited: Ethics, vulnerability, and critique. Fordham University Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Deleuze, G. (1988) Foucault. University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1970) The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Pantheon Books.
--------------- (1972) The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
--------------- (1984) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.) , The Foucault reader (pp. 76–100). Pantheon Books.
-------------- (1985) The history of sexuality, volume 2: The use of pleasure. Vintage Books.
-------------- (1986) The history of sexuality, volume 2: The use of pleasure. Vintage Books.
-------------- (1986) The history of sexuality, volume 3: The care of the self. Vintage Books.
-------------- (1995) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
-------------- (2016) About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Lectures at Dartmouth College, 1980. University of Chicago Press.
-------------- (2018) The history of sexuality, volume 4: Confessions of the flesh. Pantheon Books.
Gannon, M. J. (2002) Cultural metaphors: Their use in management practice and as a method for understanding cultures. Advances in International Management, 14, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-7929(02)14013-0.
Gamez, P. (2023) Inhuman hermeneutics of the self: Biopolitics in the age of big data. Foucault Studies, (34), 80–110. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.i34.6939.
Gutmann, J. (1988) Rousseau’s and Foucault’s “technologies of the self.” In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.) , Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 99–116). University of Massachusetts Press.
Habermas, J. (1987) The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. MIT Press.
Hayles, K. N. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Koopman, C. (2019) How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. University of Chicago Press.
McNay, L. (1994) Foucault and feminism: Power, gender and the self. Polity Press.
Mills, S. (2003) Michel Foucault. Routledge.
Patton, P. (1979) Of power and prisons. In M. Morris & P. Patton (Eds.) , Michel Foucault: Power, truth, strategy (pp. 109–147). Feral Publications.
Rajchman, J. (1985) Michel Foucault: The freedom of philosophy. Columbia University Press.
Said, E. W. (1978) Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
