تاثیر حمایت سازمانی بر خلاقیت کارکنان و کار محوری با نقش میانجی رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه (مطالعه موردی: کارکنان و اساتید اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه ملی استان لرستان)
محورهای موضوعی :محسن عارف نژاد 1 , سیده نسیم موسوی 2 , انیس مویدی 3 , سعید میر 4
1 - .دانشیارگروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرمآباد، ایران
2 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی- تجارت الکترونیک، دانشکده مبتکران، دانشگاه آزاد ملایر، ایران
3 - کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرمآباد، ایران
4 - استادیارگروه مدیریت، واحد خرمآباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خرمآباد، ایران
کلید واژه: حمایت سازمانی, خلاقیت کارکنان, رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه, دانشگاه لرستان,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: سازمانها به دلیل پیشرفت تکنولوژی، جهانی شدن و رقابت شدید با محیطی متلاطم روبرو هستند. به منظور بقا در این دنیای تجاری رقابتی، سازمانها مجبور به نوآوری و پاسخ به محیط در حال تغییر هستند. ضرورت: پژوهش حاضر با هدف تآثیر حمایت سازمانی بر خلاقیت کارکنان و کارمحوری با نقش میانجی رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه در دانشگاه ملی استان لرستان انجام شده است. روش شناسی: این مطالعه از لحاظ هدف کاربردی، از نوع توصیفی و با روش همبستگی انجام شده است. جامعه آماری در این مطالعه کارکنان و اساتید هیات علمی دانشگاه ملی استان لرستان است. به منظور تحلیل داده¬ها، روش حداقل مربعات جزئی و نرم افزار Smart PLS¬3 مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. یافتهها: جهت سنجش روایی از روایی همگرا بهره گرفته شد و به منظور برازش پایایی، آلفای کرونباخ مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و ضریب آن برای تمام سازه¬های پژوهش بیشتر از 7/0 است نتیجهگیری: نتایج بهدست آمده، حاکی از آن است که حمایت سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر خلاقیت کارکنان دارد. همچنین حمایت سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر کارمحوری دارد. و از طرف دیگر حمایت سازمانی بر رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه تأثیر مثبت ومعناداری دارد. و همچنین کارمحوری تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه دارد. و درنهایت نقش میانجی رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه در رابطه بین حمایت سازمانی بر خلاقیت کارکنان تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. و درنهایت نقش میانجی رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه در رابطه بین حمایت سازمانی بر کارمحوری تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد.
Objective: Organizations are facing a turbulent environment due to the advancement of technology, globalization and intense competition. In order to survive in this competitive business world, organizations are forced to innovate and respond to the changing environment. The present study was conducted with the aim of influencing organizational support on employee creativity and work orientation with the mediating role of innovative work behaviors in Lorestan National University. Methodology: This study is of an applied purpose, descriptive type and correlational method. The statistical population in this study is the staff and professors of the National University of Lorestan Province. In order to analyze the data, the partial least squares method and Smart PLS¬3 software were used. Conclusion: The obtained results indicate that organizational support has a positive and significant effect on employees' creativity. Originality: Also, organizational support has a positive and significant effect on work orientation. And on the other hand, organizational support has a positive and meaningful effect on innovative work behaviors. Also, work orientation has a positive and significant effect on innovative work behaviors. And finally, the mediating role of innovative work behaviors in the relationship between organizational support has a positive and significant effect on employee creativity. And finally, the mediating role of innovative work behaviors in the relationship between organizational support has a positive and significant effect on work orientation.
1. Amalia , Perizade , B, Taufiq & Zunaidah(2022). Perceived Organizational Support Has an Impact on Employee Creativity, The International Conference on Innovations in Social Sciences and ducation (ICoISSE) Bandung, Indonesia,PP.783-789.
2. Azeem,M, Hayat, A, Nawaz, R & Sajjad, H, M & Ali, M (2019). The Effect of Motivation on Employee Creativity: Evidence from NGO Sector in Southern Punjab, Pakistan, HE International Journal of Business & Management, Vol ,7,Issue 2,PP.161-166.
3. Agustina , K & Maisara, P (2022). The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support, Meaning OF Work and Proacttve Personalttu on Employee Creativtty (Study on Employees of Harno Surya Ngemplak Bothi), International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), Peer Reviewed – International Journal, Vol-6, 2,PP.1-15.
4. Abou-Moghli,(2015) A The Role of Organizational Support in Improving Employees Performance, International Business Research; Vol. 8, No,PP.198-203.
5. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6. Ackroyd, S., Batt, R. et al. (2005). The Oxford handbook of work and organization. New York, Oxford University Press.
7. Bogar,W(2023). Determinants of Employee Creatittty. Intern. Journal of Profess. Bus. Review. Miami,V. 8 8 ,n. 6 6 ,PP 01 - 17.
8. Baharuddin, F., M., Masrek, M., N., & Mohamed Shuhidan,S.(2019). Innovative Work Behaviour of School Teachers: Aconceptual Framework, IjaeduJ- International E-Journal of
9. Berdiyana, M., & Witjaksono, A. D. (2022). The Influence of Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Employee Performance. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(6), PP.314-324.
10. Climate, C. (2016). The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment on the Relationship between Creative Climate and Innovative Work Behavior: The Case of Employees of Various Sectors in Turkey Journal of Behavior at Work, 1(1), PP.74–84.
11. Deborah Eli,A & Ejoh H,O(2019). Employee Creativity and Survival of Manufacturing Firms in Port Harcourt Rivers State, International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research.PP.157-163
12. Despres, C., & Hiltrop, J.M. (1995). Human Resource management in the knowledge age: Current practice and perspectives on the future‟, Employee Relations, 17 (1), PP.9-24.
13. Ekmekcioglu,E, B & Oner, k(2023). Servant leadership, innovative work behavior and innovative
14. organizational culture:the mediating role of perceived organizational support, European Journal of Management and Business Economics, PP.1-17.
15. Felix Tombari, K(2018). Employee Creativity and Organizational Resilience Inmanufa Cturing Organizations In Rivers State, International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations ISSN 2348-7585 (Online),Vol. 6, Issue 1,PP.1821-1834,
16. Geeraerts, K., Vanhoof, J., & Bossche, P. V. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of intergenerational knowledge flows.Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, PP.150-161.
17. Haris, N., Jamaluddin, J., & Usman, E. (2023). The Effect of OrganizationalCulture, Competence and Motivation on the SMEs Performance in the Covid-19 Post Pandemic and Digital Era. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research,4(1), PP.29-40.
18. Heerwagen, J.H., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K.M., & Loftness, V. (2004) Collaborative knowledge work environments. Building Research & Information, 32 (6), PP.510-528
19. Huang, D. H., & Chen, C. P. (2014). Distributed leadership study of Taiwan’s high school principals. Proceeding of the Second International Conference on Advances in Economics, Management and Social Study, PP.62-67.
20. Hj Musneh , S, N , Azwa Ambad , N, & Mohd Roslin , R(2021). The Effect of Innovative Work Behaviour on the Performance of Service Sector SMEs in Sabah. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship e-ISSN :2550-1429 Vole 6, 1,PP.20-30
21. Ijaz,S & Nawaz,S(2022). Impact of Organizational Support on Employee Creativity and Innovative Work Behavior: Mediation of Employee Creativity, Pakistan Social Sciences Review (PSSR),Vol. 6, No.4,PP.41-51
22. Ibrahim, H, I, Isa b ,A, Md. Shahbudin, A, S(2018). Organizational Support and Creativity: The Role of Developmental Experiences as a Moderator, Organizational Support and Creativity: The Role of Developmental Experiences as a Moderator,PP.510-514.
23. Inalhan, G. (2009). Attachments: The unrecognised link between employees and their workplace (in change management projects). Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11 (1), PP.17– 37.
24. Jong, J. P., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinants of Co-Workers Innovative Behaviour: An Investigation intoKnowledge Intensive Services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(02), 189-212.
25. Jaberi , A , Gaspar , P & Barkhordar , Z(2022). The Role of Organizational Support on Life Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction of Female Coaches with the Mediating Role of Work-Family Conflict (Case study: Female Coaches in Isfaha, Journal Of Family Relations Studies ,Vol. 2, No. 7,PP.11-19.
26. Jan,R & Bosman, L(2014). Perceived Organuisational Support, Organisational Commtment and Turnover Intentions Amongstemployees In A Selected Company In The Aviation Industr,University of the Western Cape.
27. Johnston, M. P. (2015). Distributed leadership theory for investigating teacher librarian leadership. School Libraries Worldwide, 21(2), 39-57.
28. Khan, M. A. (2022). The impact of perceived organisational support on knowledge hiding behaviour of call centre employees: a moderated mediation model.International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 13(3),PP 286-310.
29. Karimi, R., & Ahmadi, F. (2023). Investigating the Effect of Employee Improvement on Organizational Citizenship Behavior with the Mediating Role ofOrganizational Trust and Commitment in the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare. Political Sociology of Iran, 5(11), PP4853-4881.
30. Khairunnisa, F. (2023). The The Influence of Perceived Organizational Support and Work Environment on Employee Performance. Youth & Islamic Economic, 4(1), PP.1-7
31. Kittel , B, Kalleitner,F & Tsakliglou,P.(2019). The Transmission of Work Centrality within the Family in a Cross-Regional Perspective, ANNALS, AAPSS, 682,PP.106-124.
32. Kurtessis, J.N., Eisenberger, R & Ford, M.T., et al. (2017) Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. Journal of Management, 43, 1854-1884.
Liu, D, Y Gong, J Zhou & JC Huang. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovationThe moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), PP.1164–1188.
33. Munandar, U. (2002). Creativity and talent, strage embodies creative potential and talent.Jakarta : Gramedia.
34. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2),PP 358-368.
35. Mary, V. S. & J. Khrisnan. (2013). Impact of Personality and Attitude on Perceived Organisational Support- A Research Study.International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research (IJHRMR) 3(2),PP 83-94.
36. Mustika, S,I, Rahardjo, K & Prasetya, A.(2019). The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Work Behavior, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, vol, 154,Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Business and Public Administration,PP.61-64.
37. Mulde,I, J & Van Veldhove,M,J, P, M)2014). The Relationship Between Work Centrality,Performance and Work Related Well Being,Talburg University.
38. Nurutomo, H, J, Irwantoro, I, Wasesa, S, Purwati,T, Sembiring ,R & Agus Purwanto,A.(2023). Nvestigating The Role of Innovative Work Behavior, Organizational Trust, Perceived Organizational Support: AN Empirical Study on.
39. Osekita, D, A, Onome, A, S & Owlabl, A, B.(2023). Mediating Role of Work Centrality on the Perceived Influence of Organisational Justice on Psychological Detachment among Employees in Ekiti State, Nigeria, UOYE Journal of Public Administration and Management, ISSN: 2992 – 4863 Vol.1 No.2,PP.43-57.
40. Paullay, I. M; Alliger, G. M. & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied psychology, 79, 224-228.
41. Park,J & Kim, W(2022). he Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Innovative Work Behaviour Through Psychological Empowerment: Focusing on the Moderated Mediating Role of Organizational Procedural Justice, Journal of Technical Education and Training,Vol,14.No,1,PP.178-191.
42. Rubiyanta & Sunaryo, S.(2023). The Influence of Organizational Support and Proaciive Personalty on Employee Creativty:The Role of Work Meaning and Devolved Management, Jrrsem, Vol. 02, No. 6, PP.987 – 1007.
43. Rybnikova, I(2016). The role of work centrality in the relationship between work alienation and organisational commitment: A study of Turkish SMEs, Journal of East European Management Studies, 21(1):PP.60-81
44. Sharma,S(2017). Work Centrality and its Relationship to Work Life Balance, International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, Volu, 15, N, 4,PP.249-261.
45. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Handbook of creativity ,PP. 3-15.
46. Sugiyono, & Afipuddien(2017). Effect of Organization Support, Affective Commitment and Extra Behavior Role of Employee Performance: Case Study at Nur Medinah Intermedia Enterprise, Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies, Vol-2, Iss-11 , PP.1036-1045.
47. Scott, D. W., & Hines, R. (2014). Rethinking and reframing leadership of historically black colleges and universities:A distributed perspective. Creative Education, 5, 1132-1139.
48. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theorydevelopment, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146-164.
49. Uçanok, B., & Karabatı, S. (2013). The Effects of Values, Work Centrality, and Organizational Commitment on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 24(1), 89–129.
50. Volery , T & Tarabashkina, L(2021). The impact of organisational support, employee creativity and work centrality on innovative work behaviour, Journal of Business Research, 129 ,PP.295–303.
51. Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014).Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. NewFrontiers in Open Innovation, 281, 287– 294.
52. Wang, YL (2013). R&D employees' innovative behaviors in Taiwan: HRM and managerial coaching as moderators. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(4), 491–515.
53. West, M.A. & Farr, J.L. (1990). Innovation at work as in West, M.A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnantponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl. Psychol Int. Rev., 51, PP.355 - 424.
54. Wirawan. (2013). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia: Teori, Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
55. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18 (2), PP.293-321.
56. Wu, W. L., Lee, Y. C., & Shu, H. S. (2013). Knowledge management in education organizations: A perspective of knowledge spiral. The International Journal of Organization Innovation, 5(4), PP.7-13.
57. Weber, M. (1958). Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner.
58. Xu, J., & Potenza, M. N. (2012). White matter integrity and five-factor personality measures in healthy adults.Neuroimage, 59(1),PP. 800-807.
59. Yuan, F. & Woodman, R. (2010). Innovative behaviour in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal. 53(2), 323-342
60. Zhang, L., Bu, Q., & Wee, S. (2016). Effect of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: Moderating role of job stressors. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(4), P.400.
61. Zhou, J., & Shalley, C.E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: a critical review and directions for future research in Joseph J. Martocchio & Gerald R. Ferris (Eds), research in personnel and human resources management ,Vol. 22,PP. 165–217
