شناسایی سرمایه‌های سازمانی و ارزیابی آن در شرایط کرونایی
محورهای موضوعی : مديريت تحقيق و توسعه
1 - دانشگاه علوم انتظامی امین، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: سرمایه‌های سازمانی, امنیت شغلی, سرمایه فیزیکی, تعاملات درونی, فرایندهای مدیریت.,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر به دنبال شناسایی سرمایه‌های سازمانی در اداره کل ثبت اسناد و املاک استان خوزستان و ارزیابی آن در دوران کرونایی بوده است. رویکرد این پژوهش کیفی- کمی و از نوع کاربردی است. جامعه آماری تحقیق در بخش کیفی، 15 نفر از خبرگان اداره کل ثبت اسناد و املاک استان خوزستان به روش غیرتصادفی هدفمند انتخاب شد. جامعه آماری تحقیق کارکنان در بخش کمی، 153 نفر ازکارکنان اداره کل ثبت اسناد و املاک استان خوزستان که براساس فرمول کوکران و به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای نسبی طبق جدول انتخاب شد. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در بخش کیفی مصاحبه ودر بخش کمی، پرسشنامه بود که روایی و پایایی آن بررسی و تأیید گردید. اطلاعات بدست‌آمده در بخش کیفی با استفاده از تحلیل مضمون (تم) و در بخش کمی با استفاده از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و با بکارگیری نرم افزارهای مکس‌کیودا و اسمارت. پی. ال. اس تجزیه و تحلیل گردید. نتایج نشان داد که فرهنگ سازمانی، مدیریت دانش، سیستم‌ها و فرایندهای مدیریت، ساختار سازمانی، مدیریت مالی، تحقیق و توسعه، تعاملات درون سازمانی، امنیت شغلی ادراک‌شده و سرمایه فیزیکی به‌عنوان سرمایه های سازمانی استخراج گردیدند. از سوی دیگر، نتایج آزمون تی نشان داد مقوله‌های امنیت شغلی، سرمایه فیزیکی، تعاملات درونی و فرایندهای مدیریت به شکل مناسبی مورد توجه قرار نگرفته است. هر چند میانگین سایر مؤلفه‌ها تا حدودی از وضعیت مناسب‌تری برخوردار هستند. لیکن وضعیتی در خور شایسته این اداره کل ثبت اسناد و املاک استان خوزستان نمی‌باشد.
The aim of the study was to identify organizational capital in the General Department of Documents and Property Registration in Khuzestan province and to evaluate it during the COVID-19 pandemic. The approach of this research is mixed (qualitative-quantitative) and applied. The statistical universe of the research in the qualitative part included 15 experts from the General Department of Documents and Property Registration in Khuzestan province, who were selected in a non-random and purposeful way. The statistical universe in the quantitative section consisted of 153 employees of this department, who were selected based on the Cochran formula and a relative stratified random method according to the table. The instrument for data collection in the qualitative part was interviews, and in the quantitative part, a questionnaire, whose validity and reliability were checked and confirmed. The information obtained in the qualitative section was analyzed using thematic analysis, and in the quantitative section using structural equation modeling with Max Kuda and Smart PLS software. The results showed that organizational culture, knowledge management, systems and processes of management, organizational structure, financial management, research and development, intra-organizational interactions, perceived job security, and physical capital were identified as organizational capitals. On the other hand, the results of the T-test showed that the categories of job security, physical capital, internal interactions, and management processes have not been properly considered. Although the averages of other components were somewhat better, the overall situation is not suitable for the General Department of Documents and Property Registration in Khuzestan province.
1- برزو، مجتبی. بررسی رابطه بین سرمایه های نامشهود سازمان و عملکرد سازمان با توجه به نقش میانجی‌گری قابلیت های بازاریابی، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه پیام نورواحد خراسان رضوی، نیشابور، ۱۳۹۹.
2- محمدصالح، اولیا؛ نورالدین، سلیمی؛ الهام، بهنام. ارایه مدلی برای اندازه‌گیری سرمایه‌های ساختاری در سازمان‌ها، پژوهشنامه حمل و نقل، 16 (58)، صص 357-347، 1398.
3- Alizadehfar S, Saffariniya M. Predicting mental health based on coronary emergency and social correlation. Social Psychology Research. 2020; 36:52-65.
4- Ferahati M. Psychological consequences of coronavirus outbreak in society. Scientific-Specialized Quarterly Journal of Social Impact Assessment. 2020; 2:207-227.
5- Abdi H, Khowsravi J, Mojtahedzadeh P. The Effects of Physical, Human and Social Capitals on the Development of Entrepreneurship Level of Economic Activists in Shahid Salimi Industrial Town of Tabriz: An Approach to Structural Equations and Rank Logit. Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling Research. 2018; 33(5):189-210.
6- Curado C, Henriques L, Bontis N. Intellectual capital disclosure payback. Management Decision. 2011; 49(7):1080-1098.
7- Halim S. Statistical analysis on the intellectual capital statement. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2010; 11(1):61-73.
8- Chen MYC, Lam LW, Zhu JNY. Should companies invest in human resource development practices? The role of intellectual capital and organizational performance improvements. Personnel Review. 2020; ahead- of- print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2019-0179 .
9- Chen J, Zhu Z, Xie H. Measuring intellectual capital: A new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2004; 5(1):195-212.
10- Bontis N. Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and Models. Management Decision. 1998; 36(2):63-76.
11- Beltramino, N.S., García- Perez- de- Lema, D. and Valdez-Juárez, L.E. "The structural capital, the innovation and the performance of the industrial SMES", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 913-945. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2019-0020, 2020.
12- Salinas- Ávila, J., Abreu- Ledón, R. and Tamayo- Arias, J., "Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: an empirical study from Colombian public universities", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 1053-1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0223. 2020.
13- Abd- Elrahman, A.-E.H., El-Borsaly, A.A.-E., Hafez, E.A.-E. and Hassan, S.A., "Intellectual capital and service quality within the mobile telecommunications sector of Egypt", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 1185-1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2019-0180, 2020.
14- Ramırez Y. Intellectual capital models in Spanish public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2010; 11(2):248-264.
15- Brown NA, Rovins JE, Feldmann-Jensen S, Orchiston C, Johnston D. Exploring disaster resilience within the hotel sector: a systematic review of literature. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017; 22:362–370.
16- Giudici M, Filimonau V. Exploring the linkages between managerial leadership, communication and teamwork in successful event delivery. Tourism Manage. Perspect. 2019; 32:100558.
17- Doherty A. A profile of community sport volunteers. Toronto, ON: Parks and Recreation Ontario. Available at: http://www.prontario.org/PDF/reports/FinalReport_ExecutiveSummary_Phase One. [10 January 2005].
18- Singh S, Kansal M. Voluntary disclosures of intellectual capital: An empirical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2011; 12(2):301-318.
19- Borzo M. Investigating the relationship between intangible assets of the organization and the performance of the organization with regard to the mediating role of marketing capabilities. Master thesis. Payame Noor University of Khorasan Razavi. 2020.
20- Mahmoudi AR, Zareei A, Famil Rohani AA. Investigating the Impact of Intellectual Capitals on Innovation Mediated by Knowledge Management in Iranian Public Libraries. Information management science and technology journal. 2020; 3(4):85-110.
21- Beltramino NS, García-Perez-de-Lema D, Valdez- Juárez LE. The structural capital, the innovation and the performance of the industrial SMES. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2020; 21(6):913-945. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2019-0020
22- Danesh F, Kazemi Alishahi H, Rahimi S, Soheili F. The relationship between social capital and intellectual capital and knowledge management in Iranian insurance. Information management science and technology journal. 2020; 6(2):129-155.
23- Olya MS, Salimi N, Behnam E. Provide a model for measuring structural capital in organizations. Ransportation Research Journal. 2019; 16(58):347-357.
24- Salinas- Ávila J, Abreu-Ledón R, Tamayo- Arias J. Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: an empirical study from Colombian public universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2020; 21(6):1053-1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0223
25- Bakhtiyari T, Safarian S, Enayati T. Presenting a structural model of factors affecting the growth of intellectual capital among faculty members of medical universities. A new approach to education management. 2018; 9(33):225-246.
26- Abd- Elrahman AEH, El- Borsaly AAE, Hafez EAE, Hassan, SA. Intellectual capital and service quality within the mobile telecommunications sector of Egypt. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2020; 21(6):1185-1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2019-0180
27- Vahdati H, Saedi A, Shariatnezhad A. Investigating the effect of strategic intelligence on human, structural and communication capital in the insurance industry. Organizational culture management. 2017; 15(45):62-85.
28- Blanco- Alcántara D, Díez- Esteban JM, Romero- Merino ME. Board networks as a source of intellectual capital for companies: Empirical evidence from a panel of Spanish firms", Management Decision. 2019; 57(10): 2653-2671. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2017-1238
29- Nguyen DQ. The impact of intellectual capital and knowledge flows on incremental and radical innovation: Empirical findings from a transition economy of Vietnam. Asia- Pacific Journal of Business Administration. 2018; 10(2/3):149-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-03-2018-0044
30- Mao Y, He J, Morrisson AM, Coca- Stefaniak JA. Effects of tourism CSR on employee psychological capital in the COVID-19 crisis: from the perspective of conservation of resources theory. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13683500.2020.1770706 in press.
31- Mojtaba T, Askari E. A study entitled "Study of the relationship between the characteristics of organizational culture and the readiness of organizational capital (Case study: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance). Strategic Management Quarterly. 2016; 27(8):1-13.
32- Pedro M. So long, minibar: how the coronavirus will change hotel stays. NBC News. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer [Accessed 13 June 2020].
33- Pena DN, Ruiz VL, Navarro JA. A case study of control strategy based onintellectual capital management. African Journal of Business Management. 2012; 6(16):5622-5632.
34- Jiang Y, Wen J. Effects of COVID-19 on hotel marketing and management: a perspective article. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM- 03-2020-0237 in press.
35- Hall CM, Scott D, G¨ossling S. Pandemics, transformations and tourism: Be careful what you wish for. Tour. Geogr in press; 2020.
36- Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, Agha M, Agha R. The socio- economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int. J. Surg. 2020; 78:185–193.
37- Dubi M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yáng X, Liu J, Xu M, Shí Z, Hú Z, Zhong W, Xiao G. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Research. 2020; 30:269-271.
38- Hancock A. Restaurants, hotels and gyms face up to a future of social distancing; 2020
