عناصر سازمانی مؤثر و نتایج همکاری رقابتی میان ویژه‌کاری‌ها در صنایع کوچک و متوسط
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت دانشحسین رحمان سرشت 1 , بهرام جبارزاده کرباسی 2
1 - دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2 - دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
کلید واژه: شیوه رهبری ساختار سازمانی همکاری رقابتی میان ویژه‌کاری سازوکارهای ترکیب دانش.,
چکیده مقاله :
با توجه به شرایط متغیر و ناپایدار محیطی، شرکت‌ها برای ادامه حیات خود و داشتن موقعیت رقابتی مناسب همواره نیازمند بهره‌گیری مناسب از دانش موجود در سازمان هستند. استفاده از این منبع بدون داشتن ساختار و رهبری مناسب امکان‌پذیر نیست. وجود ساختار و رهبری مناسب می‌تواند ضمن ایجاد رقابت برای خلق دانش جدید، با فراهم کردن فضای مناسب همکاری، شرایط تسهیم دانش خلق شده را نیز ایجاد کند. بر این اساس در این مطالعه به بررسی عناصر سازمانی مؤثر و همچنین نتایج همکاری رقابتی میان ویژه‌کاری‌ها در صنایع کوچک و متوسط پرداخته شد. نوع تحقيق علّی است و نمونه‌ی آماري اين پژوهش، 165 نفر از کارکنان و مديران شاغل در شرکت‌های مستقر در نواحی صنعتی شهر کرمان و ابزار گردآوري داده‌ها پرسشنامه است. پایایی پرسشنامه برای متغیرهای رهبری ملاحظه‌کارانه، رهبری مشارکتی، رسمیت، تمرکز، همکاری رقابتی میان ویژه‌کاری و سازوکارهای ترکیب دانش به ترتیب، 81/0، 70/0، 72/0، 70/0، 91/0 و 84/0 به دست آمد. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که رهبری ملاحظه‌کارانه و رسمیت بر همکاری رقابتی میان ویژه‌کاری اثرگذارند. اما رهبری مشارکتی و تمرکز اثری بر همکاری رقابتی میان ویژه‌کاری ندارند. همچنین نتایج نشان دادند که همکاری رقابتی میان ویژه‌کاری اثری مثبت و معنادار بر سازوکارهای ترکیب دانش دارند.
Due to changing conditions and unstable environment, Companies to survive and have a good competitive position always require proper utilization of the knowledge available in the organization. Without a proper structure and leadership style, using this source is not possible. An appropriate leadership style and structure can not only create competition for the creation of new knowledge but also by providing suitable cooperation condition, can create conditions for sharing created knowledge. Therefore this study, investigates the effective organizational elements as well as the results of cross-functional coopetition, in small and medium size industries. The study was causal and statistical sample is 165 employees and managers working in companies located in the industrial areas of Kerman city and the tool for data collection is questionnaire. Reliability for Conservative leadership, participative leadership, formalization, centralization, cross-functional coopetition and knowledge integration mechanisms is obtained 0/81, 0/70, 0/72, 0/70, 0/91 and 0/84 respectively. The results indicate that the conservative leadership and formalization impact on cross-functional coopetition but participative leadership and centralization have no effect on cross-functional coopetition. Also the results indicate that the cross-functional coopetition has a significant and positive impact on knowledge integration mechanisms.
رحمان سرشت، حسین، رادمرد، سید قادر و گلوانی، محمد(1390) ”رابطه ساختار سازمانی و مدیریت دانش (مطالعه‌ای در معاونت تولید قطعات پرسی شرکت ایران‌خودرو) “، مجله مدیریت فرهنگ‌سازمانی، دوره 9، شماره 23، صص 31-50.#
رحمان سرشت، حسین (1378) ”ماهیت و پایداری تمرکز و عدم تمرکز در سازمان‌ها (مباحث نظری) “، همایش نظام اداری و توسعه 17-18 مرداد، تهران#
شهبازی، کیومرث، حسنی، محمد و شهبازی، نسیم (1393) ”تأثیر هزینه‌های آموزش‌وپرورش بر ارزش‌افزوده بخش صنعت“، فصلنامه تعليم و تربيت، دوره 30، شماره 2، صص 141 -162#
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). “Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation”. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61–83.#
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2007). “Performance implications of the direct and moderating effects of centralization and formalization on customer orientation”. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(8), 1022–1034#.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). “Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges”. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180–188#.
Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2006). “Participative leadership by American and Chinese managers in China: The role of relationships”. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1727–1752#.
De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2009). “When good conflict gets better and bad conflict becomes worse: The role of social capital in the conflict–innovation relationship”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 283–297#
Enberg, C.,(2012) “Enabling knowledge integration in coopetitive R&D projects — The management of conflicting logics”, International Journal of Project Management, 30 (7), 771–780#
Engelen, A. (2010). “Entrepreneurial orientation as a function of national cultural variations in two countries”. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 354–368#.
Ernst, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). “Sales, marketing, and researchand- development cooperation across new product development stages: Implications for success”. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 80–92#.
Estrada, I, Faems, D, Faria, P (2016) “Coopetition and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms”, Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 56–65#
Flatten, T., Adams, D., & Brettel, M. (2014). “Fostering absorptive capacity through leadership: A cross-cultural analysis”. Journal of World Business. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jwb.2014.08.010 (in press)#.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of marketing research, 18 (1): 39-50#.
Garrett, T. C., Buisson, D. H., & Yap, C.M. (2006). "National culture and R&D and marketing integration mechanisms in new product development: A cross-cultural study between Singapore and New Zealand". Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 293–307#.
Ghobadi, S., & D'Ambra, J. (2012). “Coopetitive relationships in cross-functional software development teams: How to model and measure?” Journal of Systems and Software, 85(5), 1096–1104#.
Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). “Why some new products are more successful than others”. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362–375#.
Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y. (2010). “Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 122–143#.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. a. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). “Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators”. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674#.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). “Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences”. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70#.
Luo, X., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Pan, X. (2006). “Cross-functional “coopetition”: The simultaneous role of cooperation and competition within firms”. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 67–80#.
Luo, Y. (2005). “Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries”. Journal of World Business, 40(1), 71–90#.
Magner, N., Welker, R.B. & Campbell, T.L. (1996). “Testing a model of cognitive budgetary participation processes in a latent variable structural equations framework”. Accounting and Business Research, 27(1): 41-50#.
McDonough, E. F., III (2000). “Investigation of factors contributing to the success oc crossfunctional teams”. Journal of Product Innovation Management. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0737-6782(00)00041–2#.
Park, B. J. R., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2014). “Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance”. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210–221#
Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Zaragoza-Sáez, P., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2010). “Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance?” Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 310–320#
Pinto, M. B., Pinto, J. K., & Prescott, J. E. (1993). “Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science”, 39(10), 1281–1297. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1281#.
Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). “The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels”. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198#.
Ritala, P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., (2009). “What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition”. Technovation, 29 (12), 819–828#.
Sarin, S., & O'Connor, G. C. (2009). “First among equals: The effect of team leader characteristics on the internal dynamics of cross-functional product development teams”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 188–205#.
Sarin, S., & McDermott, C. (2003). “The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams”. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 707–739#.
Schmickl, C., Kieser, A., (2008). “How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations?” Research Policy 37 (6/7), 1148–1163#.
Sivasubramaniam, N., Liebowitz, S. J., & Lackman, C. L. (2012). “Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta-analytic review”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 803–820#.
Song, M., & Thieme, R. J. (2006). “A cross-national investigation of the R&D–marketing interface in the product innovation process”. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 308–322#.
Somech, A. (2006). “The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams”. Journal of Management, 32(1), 132–157#.
Strese, Steffen, W.Meuer, Marcel, C. Flatten, Tessa, Brettel, Malte (2015) “Organizational antecedents of cross-functional coopetition: The impact of leadership and organizational structure on cross-functional coopetition”, Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.006#
Taylor, A. (2010). “The next generation: Technology adoption and integration through internal competition in new product development”. Organization Science, 21(1), 23–41#.
Troy, L. C., Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2008). “Cross-functional integration and new product success: An empirical investigation of the findings”. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 132–146#
Tsai,W. (2002). “Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing”. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190#.
Tsai, K.-H., Hsu, T.T. (2014) “Cross-Functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: A mediated moderation mode”. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 293–303#.
Tsai, K, Liao, Y, Hsu, T.T (2015) “Does the use of knowledge integration mechanisms enhance product innovativeness?”, Industrial Marketing Management, 46,214–223#
Yami, S., Castaldo, S., Dagnino, G. B., & Le Roy, F. (2010). In S. Yami, S. Castaldo, G. B. Dagnino, & F. Le Roy (Eds.), “Coopetition: Winning strategies for the 21st century”. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing#
