A Survey of Two Dominant Low Power and Long Range Communication Technologies
محورهای موضوعی : Communication Systems & DevicesYas Hosseini Tehrani 1 , Seyed Mojtaba Atarodi 2 , Ziba Fazel 3
1 - Sharif University of Technology
2 - Sharif university of Technology
3 - Sharif University of Technology
کلید واژه: LPWAN , Internet of Things , Narrowband , Wideband , NB-IoT , LoRaWAN,
چکیده مقاله :
The Internet of Things (IoT) connects various kinds of things such as physical devices, vehicles, home appliances, etc. to each other enabling them to exchange data. The IoT also allows objects to be sensed or controlled remotely and results in improved efficiency, accuracy and economic benefits. Therefore, the number of connected devices through IoT is increasing rapidly. Machina Research estimates that the IoT will consist of about 2.6 billion objects by 2020. Different network technologies have been developed to provide connectivity of this large number of devices, like WiFi for cellular-based connections, ZigBee and Bluetooth for indoor connections and Low Power Wide Area Network's (LPWAN) for low power long-distance connections. LPWAN may be used as a private network, or may also be a service offered by a third party, allowing companies to deploy it without investing in gateway technology. Two available leading technologies for LPWAN are narrow-band systems and wide-band plus coding gain systems. In the first one, receiver bandwidth is scaled down to reduce noise seen by the receiver, while in the second one, coding gain is added to the higher rate signal to combat the high receiver noise in a wideband receiver. Both LoRa and NB-IoT standards were developed to improve security, power efficiency, and interoperability for IoT devices. They support bidirectional communication, and both are designed to scale well, from a few devices to millions of devices. LoRa operates in low frequencies, particularly in an unlicensed spectrum, which avoids additional subscription costs in comparison to NB-IoT, but has lower Quality of Service. NB-IoT is designed to function in a 200kHz carrier re-farmed from GSM, with the additional advantage of being able to operate in a shared spectrum with an existing LTE network. But in the other hand, it has lower battery lifetime and capacity. This paper is a survey on both systems. The review includes an in-depth study of their essential parameters such as battery lifetime, capacity, cost, QoS, latency, reliability, and range and presents a comprehensive comparison between them. This paper reviews created testbeds of recent researches over both systems to compare and verify their performance.
The Internet of Things (IoT) connects various kinds of things such as physical devices, vehicles, home appliances, etc. to each other enabling them to exchange data. The IoT also allows objects to be sensed or controlled remotely and results in improved efficiency, accuracy and economic benefits. Therefore, the number of connected devices through IoT is increasing rapidly. Machina Research estimates that the IoT will consist of about 2.6 billion objects by 2020. Different network technologies have been developed to provide connectivity of this large number of devices, like WiFi for cellular-based connections, ZigBee and Bluetooth for indoor connections and Low Power Wide Area Network's (LPWAN) for low power long-distance connections. LPWAN may be used as a private network, or may also be a service offered by a third party, allowing companies to deploy it without investing in gateway technology. Two available leading technologies for LPWAN are narrow-band systems and wide-band plus coding gain systems. In the first one, receiver bandwidth is scaled down to reduce noise seen by the receiver, while in the second one, coding gain is added to the higher rate signal to combat the high receiver noise in a wideband receiver. Both LoRa and NB-IoT standards were developed to improve security, power efficiency, and interoperability for IoT devices. They support bidirectional communication, and both are designed to scale well, from a few devices to millions of devices. LoRa operates in low frequencies, particularly in an unlicensed spectrum, which avoids additional subscription costs in comparison to NB-IoT, but has lower Quality of Service. NB-IoT is designed to function in a 200kHz carrier re-farmed from GSM, with the additional advantage of being able to operate in a shared spectrum with an existing LTE network. But in the other hand, it has lower battery lifetime and capacity. This paper is a survey on both systems. The review includes an in-depth study of their essential parameters such as battery lifetime, capacity, cost, QoS, latency, reliability, and range and presents a comprehensive comparison between them. This paper reviews created testbeds of recent researches over both systems to compare and verify their performance.
[1] R. Sinha, Y. Wei, and S. Hwang; “A survey on LPWA technology: LoRa and NB-IoT,” Elsevier, ICT Express 3, 14–21, 2017.
[2] Semtech, AN 120022, LoRa Modulation Basics, May 2015. Available: http://www.semtech.com/images/datasheet/an1200.22pdf. [3] Link Labs, “NB-IoT vs. LoRa vs. Sigfox,” Home Blog, January 23, 2017.
[4] H. Wang and A. O. Fapojuwo, “A Survey of Enabling Technologies of Low Power and Long Range Machine-to-Machine Communications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, DOI 10.1109/COMST.2017.2721379.
[5] INGENU, “RPMA Technology for the Internet of Things,” 14 March 2017. Available: http://theinternetofthings.report/Resources/Whitepapers/4cbc5e5e-6ef8-4455-b8cd-f6e3888624cb_RPMA%20Technology.pdf.
[6] Nokia, “LTE evolution for IoT connectivity,” Nokia, 2016. Available: http://resources.alcatel-lucent.com/asset/200178.
[7] R. Ratasuk, N. Mangalvedhe, Y. Zhang, M. Robert and J. P. Koskinen, “Overview of narrowband IoT in LTE Rel-13,” 2016 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN), Berlin, 2016.
[8] Nicolas Ducrot et al., Olivier Hersent et al.; “LoRa Device Developer Guide,” Orange Connected Objects & Partnerships plus Activity, April, 2016.
[9] LoRa Alliance, “A technical overview of LoRa and LoRaWAN,” Technical Marketing Workgroup 1.0, 2016.
[10] D. Rohde, J. Schwarz, Narrowband Internet of Things, Aug., 2016.Available: https://www.rohdeschwarz.com/us/applications/narrowba d-Internet-of-things-application-note 56280-314242.html.
[11] F. Samie, L. Bauer, and J. Henkel. "IoT Technologies for Embedded Computing: A Survey." Proceedings of the Eleventh IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis. CODES ’16. 2016, 8:1–8:10.
[12] S. Andreev et al. “Understanding the IoT connectivity landscape: a contemporary M2M radio technology roadmap” IEEE Communications Magazine, 2015, pp. 32–40.
[13] M. Elkhodr, S. Shahrestani, and H. Cheung. "Emerging Wireless Technologies in the Internet of Things: A Comparative Study." International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN), 2016.
[14] U. Raza, P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara. "Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview," IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 2017.
[15] R. Sanchez-Iborra and M. Cano. "State of the Art in LP-WAN Solutions for Industrial IoT Services." Sensors, 2016.
[16] A. Ali et al. "Technologies and challenges in developing Machine-to-Machine applications: A survey." Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2017, pp. 124 –139.
[17] B. Moyer. "Low Power, Wide Area: A Survey of Longer-Range IoT Wireless Protocols." EE Journal, 2015.
[18] Q. Song, L. Nuaymi, and X. Lagrange. "Survey of radio resource management issues and proposals for energy efficient cellular networks that will cover billions of machines." EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2016.
[19] W. Guibene, K. E. Nolan, and M. Y. Kelly. "Survey on Clean Slate Cellular-IoT Standard Proposals." 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 2015.
[20] K. Mikhaylov, J. Petaejaejaervi, and T. Haenninen, “Analysis of Capacity and Scalability of the LoRa Low Power Wide Area Network Technology,” European Wireless, May 2016, pp. 1–6.
[21] N. Mangalvedhe, R. Ratasuk, and A. Ghosh, “NB-IoT Deployment Study for Low Power Wide Area Cellular IoT,” PIMRC, 2016.
[22] M. Lauridsen, H, Nguyen, B. Vejlgaard, I. Kovacs, and P. Mogensen, “comparison of GPRS, NB-IoT, LoRa, and SigFox in a 7900km^2 area”, Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), 2017 IEEE 85th, Nov. 2017.
[23] L.Angrisani, P.Arpaia, F. Bonavolonta, M. Conti, and A. Liccardo, “LoRa Protocol Performance Assessment in Critical Noise Conditions,” Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI), 2017 IEEE International Forum on, Sept. 2017.
[24] C.Orfanidis, L.Feeney, M. Jacobsson, and P. Gunningberg, “Investigating interference between LoRa and IEEE 802.15.4g networks”, 2017 IEEE 13th international Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Network and Communications (WiMOB), 2017.
[25] L. Gregora, L. Vojtech, and M. Neruda, “Indoor Signal Propagation of LoRa Technology,” 2016 17th International Conference on Mechatronics Mechatronika (ME), Prague, Czech Republic, 2016, pp. 1–4.
[26] A. Wixted, P. Kinnaird, A. Tait, A. Ahmadinia, and N. Strachan, “Evaluation of LoRa and LoRaWAN for Wireless Sensor Networks,” 2016 IEEE SENSORS, October 2016, pp. 1–3.
[27] M. Bor, J. Vidler, and U. Roedig, “LoRa for the Internet of Things,” Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, Graz, Austria, February 2016, pp. 361–366.
[28] A. Zanella and M. Zorzi, “Long-Range Communications in Unlicensed Bands: The Rising Stars in the IoT and Smart City Scenarios,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 60–67, October 2016.
[29] P. Neumann, J. Montavont, and T. No¨el, “Indoor Deployment of Low-Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN): a LoRaWAN case study”, 2016 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), New York, NY, USA, October 2016, pp. 1–8.
[30] M. Aref and A. Sikora, “Free-space range measurements with Semtech LoRaTM technology,” 2014 2nd International Symposium on Wireless Systems within the Conferences on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing System (IDAACS-SWS 2014), Offenburg, Germany, September 2014, pp. 19–23.
[31] Lukas, W. A. Tanumihardja, and E. Gunawan, “On the application of IoT: Monitoring of troughs water level using WSN,” 2015 IEEE Conference on Wireless Sensors, ICWiSE 2015, Melaka, Malaysia, August 2016, pp. 58–62.
[32] J. Pet¨aj¨aj¨arvi, K. Mikhaylov, A. Roivainen, T. H¨anninen, and M. Pettissalo, “On the coverage of LPWANs: Range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology,” 2015 14th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST 2015), Copenhagen, Denmark, December 2016, pp. 55–59.
[33] J. Pet¨aj¨aj¨arvi, K. Mikhaylov, M. H¨am¨al¨ainen, and J. Iinatti, “Evaluation of LoRa LPWAN technology for remote health and wellbeing monitoring,” International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT), Worcester, MA, USA, March 2016, pp. 1–5.
[34] T. Wendt, F. Volk, and E. Mackensen, “A benchmark survey of Long Range (LoRa TM) Spread Spectrum-Communication at 2.45 GHz for safety applications”, Wireless and Microwave Technology Conference (WAMICON), 2015 IEEE 16th Annual, Cocoa Beach, FL, USA, April 2015, pp. 1–4.
[35] A. Augustin, J. Yi, T. Clausen, and W. Townsley, “A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 9, 2016.
[36] S. persia, C. Carciofi, and M. Faccili, “NB-IoT and LoRa Connectivity analysis for M2M/IoT Smart Grid Applications,” 2017 AEIT International Annual Conference, Dec. 2017.
[37] M.Pennacchiono, M. Gabriella, T, Oercorella, C. Carrlini, “NB-IoT System Deployment for Smart Metering: Evaluation of Coverage and Capacity Performances,” 2017 AEIT International Annual Conference, Dec. 2017.
