طراحی الگوی قطب نوآوری فناوری با استفاده از رویکرد مدل‌سازی تفسیری ساختاری ISM))
الموضوعات :
رمضان مهدی زاده
1
(دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علی‌آباد کتول)
پرویز سعیدی
2
(دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علی‌آباد کتول)
بابک ضیاء
3
(دانشگاه تهران)
احمد مهرابیان
4
(دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علی‌آباد کتول)
الکلمات المفتاحية: قطب نوآوری اکوسیستم نوآوری کارآفرینی فناورانه مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری الگو,
ملخص المقالة :
قطب نوآوری یک اکوسیستم تحقیق و نوآوری منحصر به فرد است. این یک محیط جهانی است که اعضای علمی با کیفیت بالا، محققان، دانشجویان، نوآوران و کارآفرینان را جذب می‌کند. قطب‌های نوآوری به‌عنوان اجزای ضروری توسعه اقتصادی و اجتماعی مبتنی بر دانش در سال‌های اخیر در اکوسیستم نوآوری در حال گسترش می‌باشد و در طول مکانیسم‌های رشد کسب‌و‌کارهای فناورانه مورد توجه سیاست‌گذاران علم و فناوری در کشورها قرار گرفته است. برای رشد نوآوری‌های فناورانه در کشورهای در حال توسعه نیاز به شناخت و درک عمیق‌تری از فرایندهای ساختارهای توسعه نوآوری می‌باشد تا در اجرا و الگو‌برداری، اثربخشی مطلوب حاصل گردد لذا پژوهش حاضر بدنبال این هدف است که الگوی قطب نوآوری فناوری چگونه است. در این پژوهش از روش آمیخته کیفی و کمی استفاده شد. پژوهشگران پس از مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و مصاحبه با خبرگان عوامل کلیدی در ایجاد قطب نوآوری را شناسایی که شامل شش بعد شبکه و تعاملات اجتماعی، زیرساخت و منابع، وجود شرکت‌های نوآورانه و دانش‌بنیان، عوامل نهادی و تیم و ساختار شد. در این پژوهش با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی تفسیری ساختاری ISM، عوامل مؤثر بر ایجاد قطب نوآوری فناورانه بطور سطح‌مند، اولویت‌بندی گردید و روابط میان عوامل نیز محاسبه گردید. عامل تیم مدیریتی و ساختار با بیشترین نفوذ بر دیگر عوامل و کمترین وابستگی به آنها بیشترین تأثیر را در روابط میان عوامل ایجاد قطب نوآوری داشته است.
1- Gow, J. I. Public Sector Innovation Theory Revisited, The Innovation Journal, 19 (2), 1-22, 2014. Available at: https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2014_19_2_1_gow_public-invoate-theory.pdf
2- Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C. & Chandy, R. K. Radical Innovation across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), pp. 3–23, 2009. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.1.003
3- Prabhu, J. The importance of building a culture of innovation in a recession. Strategic HR Review, 9(2), pp. 5–11, 2010. doi:10.1108/14754391011022208.
4- Jiménez, A., & Zheng, Y. Tech hubs, innovation and development. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), pp. 95–118, 2017. doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1335282
5- Oksanen, K. & Hautamäki, A. Transforming regions into innovation ecosystems: A model for renewing local industrial structures. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 19(2), pp. 2–17, 2014. Available at: https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/transforming-regions-into-innovation-ecosystems-a-model-for-renew.
6- Hwang, W. & Horowitt, G. The Rainforest: the secret to building the next silicon valley. Regenwald, Los Altos Hills, CA, 2012.
7- Durst, S. & Poutanen, P. Success factors of innovation ecosystems: A literature review. In R. Smeds, & O. Irrmann (Eds.), CO-CREATE 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co-Design in Innovation Aalto University, 2013.
8- Rabelo, R. J, & Bernus, P. A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 28(3), pp. 2250–2257, 2015. doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.423
9- Waits M. J. Guidelines for Building an Innovation Hub, 2018. Available at: http://www.fora.org/Reports/Colloq/Panel_2_MaryJoWaits_121213.pdf
10- Shirazi, H., Hashemzadeh, G., Radfar, R., Torabi, T. The effect innovation capability on technology commercialization performance in knowledge based companies: The mediating role organizational innovation. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 2(3): 81-106, 2019. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2019.101025
11- enterari, Y., mahjub, H. Structural Analysis of the National Innovation Ecosystem: Utilizing Global Data for Iranian Policy Making. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 3(1): 87-118, 2020. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2020.207905.1221.
12- Adeli, O. A., Maghsoudi, H., Saeedi, A., & Bahrami, H. Dynamic Game between Science and Technology Institutions. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 12(2), pp. 55-70, 2020. {In Persian}. DOI: 10.22034/jstp.2020.12.2.1209.
13- Mowery, D.C., Sampat, B.N. Universities in national innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 209– 239, 2005.
14- Valero, A., Van Reenen, J. The economic impact of universities: evidence from across the globe. Econ. Educ. Rev. 68, 53–67, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.09.001.
15- Hicks, D. Performance-based university research funding systems. Res. Policy 41 (2), 251–261, 2012. doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
16- Datta, S., Saad, M. & Sarpong, D. National systems of innovation, innovation niches, and diversity in university systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, pp. 27-36, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.005
17- Etzkowitz, H. Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), pp. 115–128, 2002. doi:10.3152/147154302781781056.
18- McAdam, M., Miller, K., & McAdam, R. Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, 50-51, 69–78, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.002
19- Vila, C.P. & Page, J.L. New Environments Favourable to Innovation paradigmes issue no, 2008. Available at: www.gencat/cat/diue/doc/doc_25819940_3.pdf.
20- Naranjo-Valencia, Julia C. Calderón-Hernández, Gregorio. Building a culture of innovation. A proposal for cultural transformation, Management Studies, 31(135), 2015. http://ref.scielo.org/zd6pwq.
21- Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), pp. 997–1008, 2017. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8.
22- Saad, M., Guermat, C., Brodie, L. National innovation and knowledge performance: the role of higher education teaching and training. The Journal of Higher Education Studies 4 (7), 1194–1209, 2015. doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881344.
23- Kwon, S., Motohashi, K. How institutional arrangements in the National Innovation System affect industrial competitiveness: a study of Japan and the US with multiagent simulation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 115, 221–235, 2017. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.005
24- Sambuli, N. & Whitt, J.P. Technology innovation hubs and policy engagement, Making All Voices Count Research Report, Brighton: IDS, 2017. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/12860.
25- Subramaniam, G. What is the definition of an innovation hub? 2015. Available at: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-definition-of-an-innovation-hub.
26- Donovan, D., Larouche, T., Etzinger, B. & MacLennan, Christopher. Innovation Hub, CENTRAL INNOVATION HUB PRIVY COUNCIL OFFICE, 2016. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/pco-bcp/documents/pdfs/inn-inn/rpt1_2016-eng.pdf.
27- Beer, J., De Millar, P., Mwangi, J., Nzomo, V. & Rutenberg, I. A Framework for Assessing Technology Hubs in Africa. NYU Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, 6(2), 2017. Available at: http://www.openair.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/WP-2-Framework-for-Assessing-Technology-Hubs-in-Africa.pdf.
28- Petti, C. & Zhang, S. Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), pp. 7-25, 2011.
29- Petti, C. ed. Cases in technological entrepreneurship: Converting ideas into value. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
30- Ramazanpour Nargesi, Q., Davari, A. And Dehghan, A. The effect of intellectual capitals on competitive advantage with the mediating effects of technological entrepreneurship(Case study: Companies based in the incubators centers of Tehran). Journal of Technology Development Management, 5(2), pp. 41-61, 2017. {In Persian}. doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2018.1898.1654.
31- Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case Study on the Influence of Environmental Factors on Entrepreneurial Success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), pp.95-101, 2012. sci-https://sci-hub.se/10.0000/www.iiste.org/Journals/EJBM/3007.
32- Spigel, B., (2015). The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), pp.49–72. doi:10.1111/etap.12167.
33- Holloway, I., & Todres, L. The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative research, 3(3), pp. 345-357, 2003.
34- Charan, P., Shankar, R., & Baisya, R. K. Analysis of interactions among the variables of supply chain performance measurement system implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4), pp. 512–529, 2008. doi:10.1108/14637150810888055.
35- Aloini, D., Dulmin, R. & Mininno, V. Risk assessment in ERP projects. Information Systems, 37(3), pp. 183–199, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.is.2011.10.001.
36- Friederici, N. How Nascent Technology Entrepreneurs Organize: The Community Assembly Process, DRUID17, New York, USA, June 12-14, 2017. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3123804.
37- Sharma, S. K. & Meyer, K. E. Industrializing Innovation-the Next Revolution. Springer, Cham, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12430-4.
38- Carrincazeaux, C. & Gaschet, F. Regional Innovation Systems and Economic Performance: Between Regions and Nations. European Planning Studies, 23(2), pp. 262–291, 2014. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.861809.
39- Fabrício, Jr. R., de, S., da Silva, F. R., Simões, E., Galegale, N. V., & Akabane, G. K. Strengthening of Open Innovation Model: using startups and technology parks. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), pp. 14–20, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.051.
40- Ryan, P. & Giblin, M. High-tech Clusters, Innovation Capabilities and Technological Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Ireland. The World Economy, 35(10), 1322–1339, 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01486.x.
41- Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case Study on the Influence of Environmental Factors on Entrepreneurial Success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), 95-101, 2012. https://sci-hub.se/10.0000/www.iiste.org/Journals/EJBM/3007.
42- Bahemia, H. & Squire, B. A contingent perspective of open innovation in view product development projects. Druid summer conference on opening up innovation: strategy, organization and technology, London, England, June: pp. 16-18, 2010. Available at: http://www.journalijar.com/uploads/628_IJAR-15109.pdf.
43- Stankovic, I. & Gocic, M. T. Forming of Science and Technology Park as an Aspect of Civil Engineering. Architecture and Civil Engineering, 7(1), pp. 57-64, 2009. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/22a9/ac140d21caa39b021d684bcfc612d4eb415d.pdf.
44- Hochberg, Y. V. Accelerating Entrepreneurs and Ecosystems: The Seed Accelerator Model. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 16, pp. 25–51, 2016. doi:10.1086/684985.
45- Saidi, T., de Villiers, K., & Douglas, T. S. The sociology of space as a catalyst for innovation in the health sector. Social Science & Medicine, 180, pp.. 36–44, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.015.
46- Jafar, A., Akbari, M., & Davari, A. The Effective Factors on the Formation of Innovation Clusters: The Case of Sharif Innovation District. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 12(1), pp. 1-14, 2020. {In Persian}. DOI: 10.22034/jstp.2020.12.1.1119.
