واکاوی فرایند شناسایی فرصت در شرکت های فعال درحوزه فناوری های همگرا
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت تکنولوژی
محمد هاشمی
1
,
علي مبيني دهكردي
2
,
محمدرضا ميگون پوری
3
,
کمال سخدری
4
1 - دانشگاه تهران
2 - دانشگاه تهران
3 - دانشگاه تهران
4 - دانشگاه تهران
کلید واژه: فرصت کارآفرینانه شناسایی فرصت کارآفرینی سازمانی فناورانه فناوری های همگرا مطالعات میان رشته ای ,
چکیده مقاله :
در عصر حاضر، نوآوری های فناورانه، عامل کلیدی توسعه و پیشرفت جوامع بوده و کارآفرینی فناورانه، از طریق شناسایی و بهره برداری موثر از فرصت های فناوری، به عنوان منشا اصلی ایجاد نوآوری های تحول زا، شناخته می شود. با توجه به نوظهوري مفهوم "همگرايي" در فناوري‌های پيشرفته و فرصت‌هاي بدیع ناشي از آن، لازم است ابعاد مختلف این پدیده، خصوصاً فرایند شناسایی فرصت، به عنوان اولین و بنیادی ترین گام از فرایند کارآفرینی فناورانه شناخته شود. اين پژوهش بر مبنای معرفت شناسی "تفسیر گرایی" و از نوع اکتشافی بوده و بر روی ادبیات فرصت کارآفرینانه، کارآفرینی سازمانی فناورانه، مطالعات میان رشته ای و فناوریهای همگرا، استوار می باشد. در اين پژوهش، واحد تحليل، " فرایند شناسایی فرصت" و سطح تحليل، "سازمان" بوده و مفهوم " همگرایی" به عنوان رویکرد حاكم بر پژوهش، مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. همچنین، روش تحقیق مورد استفاده، کیفی و استراتژی تحقیق، مطالعه چندموردی می باشد. گردآوری داده های مورد نیاز پژوهش، از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته و مشاهده مستندات آرشیوی انجام گرفته است. نتایج پژوهش، بیانگر اهمیت فوق العاده عواملی همچون، فهم میان رشته ای، ظرفیت جذب میان رشته ای و نوع سرمایه انسانی، در فرایند شناسایی فرصت در شرکت های فعال حوزه فناوریهای همگرا می باشد.
In the present era, technological innovation is a key factor in the development and advancement of societies, and technological entrepreneurship is recognized as the main source of disruptive innovation through identifying and effectively exploiting technological opportunities. Given the emerging concept of "convergence" in high technologies and novel opportunities resulting from that, it is necessary to recognize the various dimensions of this phenomenon, especially the process of identifying opportunities, as the first and most fundamental step of the technological entrepreneurship process. This research is based on the epistemology of "interpretiveism" and it is exploratory and based on literature on Entrepreneurial opportunities, technological corporate entrepreneurship, interdisciplinary studies and convergent technologies. In this research, the unit of analysis, is the "opportunity identification process" and the level of analysis, is "organization" and the concept of "convergence" as the dominant approach to research has been considered. Also, the research method is qualitative and research strategy, is a multiple case study. The collection of research data has been done through a semi-structured interview and observation of archival documents. The results of the research indicate the great importance of factors such as interdisciplinary understanding, interdisciplinary absorptive capacity, and the type of human capital in the process of identifying opportunities in active companies in the field of converging technologies
Alves, J., Marques, M. J., Saur, I., & Marques, P. (2007). Creativity and innovation through multidisciplinary and multisectoral
cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 27-34. Antoncic, B., & Prodan, I. (2008). Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: Testing a model on manufacturing firms. Technovation, 28(5), 257-265.
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105-123.
Arenius, P., & De Clercq, D. (2005). A network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 249–265.
Bainbridge, W. S., & Roco, M. C. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer International Publishing.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.
Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 104-119.
Choi, Y. R., Lévesque, M., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008). When should entrepreneurs expedite or delay opportunity exploitation?. Journal of business venturing, 23(3), 333-355.
Cho, c., & Yoon, B., & Coh, b., An & Lee, S. (2014) Empirical analysis on purposes, drivers and activities of technology opportunity discovery: the case of Korean SMEs in the manufacturing sector, R&D MANAGEMENT
Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of management, 30(3), 377-395.
Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., Zahra, S. A., Floyd, S. W., Janney, J. J., & Lane, P. J. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of management, 29(3), 351-378.
Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship.Journal of management, 29(3), 333-349. Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1246-1264.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-50. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32.
Fiet, J. O., Piskounov, A., & Patel, P. C. (2005). Still Searching (Systematically) 1 for Entrepreneurial Discoveries. Small business economics, 25(5), 489-504.
García-Cabrera, A. M., & García-Soto, M. G. (2009). A dynamic model of technology-based opportunity recognition. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 167-190.
George, N. M., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity
recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine
O'Gorman, K. D., & MacIntosh, R. (2014). Research methods for business and management. Goodfellow Publishers Limited. Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization Science, 21(2), 413-431.
Grégoire, D. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2012). Technology-market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial
opportunities: An investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus. Academy of Management journal, 55(4), 753-785.
Grégoire,D.A. & Shepherd,D.A. (2015). Opportunity identification. Encyclopedia of Management, Wiley. Gruber, M., MacMillan, I. C., & Thompson, J. D. (2013). Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: What shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified.
Hills, G. E., Shrader, R. C., & Lumpkin, G. T. (1999). Opportunity recognition as a creative process. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 19(19), 216-227.
Karlesky, M. J. (2015). IDENTIFYING ENTREPRENEURIAL OPPORTUNITIES: COGNITION AND CATEGORIZATION IN NASCENT ENTREPRENEURS (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan).
Urban,B, &, Wood,E (2015) The importance of opportunity recognition behaviour and motivators of employees when
engaged in corporate entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16:5, 980-994. Klein, J. T., & Newell, W. H. (1997). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change, 393-415.
Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. University of Virginia Press Krueger, N. (2000). The Cognitive Infrastructure of Opportunity Emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 24(3), 5-23.
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The re-identification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of
the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.
Lockwood, T. (2010). Design thinking. New York: Allworth. Marvel, M. R., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2007). Technology entrepreneurs' human capital and its effects on innovation radicalness.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 807-828. NRC (National Research Council of the National Academies) (2014a) Complex operational decision making in networked
systems of humans and machines: a multidisciplinary approach. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Nordmann, A., 2004. Converging Technologies – Shaping the Future of European Societies. Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry
networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174–192. Ozgen, E. (2009). The collaborative frontiers of social networks and opportunity recognition in convergent technologies.
Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(1/2), 111 Parker, S. C., & van Praag, C. M. (2012). The entrepreneur’s mode of entry: Business takeover or new venture start? Journal
of Business Venturing, 27 (1), 31–46.
Repko, A. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Sage.
Roco, M.C. & Bainbridge, W.S. (2002), “Converging technologies for improving human Performance”, Roininen, S. (2006). The start-up process of academic spin-offs and non-academic ventures. Luleå tekniska
universitet/Industriell ekonomi och samhällsvetenskap/Entreprenörskap. Sarasvathy, S. D., Venkataraman, S., Dew, N., & Velamuri, R. (2003). Three Views of Entreprenerial Opportunity. In Z. Acs &
e. al. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship Handbook. Shane, S., Venkataraman, S., 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management
Review 25, 217– 226.
Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative
approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: California: Sage Publications, Inc Wang, Y.L., Ellinger, A.D., Wu, Y.C.J., 2013. Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: an empirical study of R&D personnel.
Management Decision 51 (2), 248–266
Vogel, P. (2016). From venture idea to venture opportunity Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). The concept of “opportunity” in entrepreneurship research:
Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 36(1), 40-65.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Design and methods. Case study research.
Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: California: Sage Publications, Inc Vogel, P. (2016). From venture idea to venture opportunity Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Wang, Y.L., Ellinger, A.D., Wu, Y.C.J., 2013. Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: an empirical study of R&D personnel.
Management Decision 51 (2), 248–266 Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry
technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735 Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of
Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. Zahra, S.A. (2008). the virtuous cycle of discovery and creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Strategic
Entrepreneurship Journal Volume 2, Issue 3, p.243-257. Zahra, S. A, Donald O. Neubaum , James C. Hayton (2016). Handbook of research on corporate entrepreneurship. Edward
Elgar Publishing.
