طراحی الگوی مدیریت سبد پروژه های تحقیق و توسعه خدمات سلامت مبتنی بر فناوری اطلاعات با رویکرد مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری
محورهای موضوعی : مديريت تکنولوژي
عباس خمسه
1
,
مریم خردرنجبر
2
,
Seyed Javad Iranban
3
1 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران.
2 - گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ایران
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
کلید واژه: الگو, مدیریت سبد پروژه های تحقیق و توسعه, خدمات سلامت, فناوری اطلاعات, مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: در عصری که با پیشرفتهای فناورانه و ضرورت ارتقای خدمات مراقبتهای بهداشتی تعریف شده، مدیریت مؤثر مجموعههای تحقیق و توسعه سلامت از اهمیت بالایی برخورداراست. این مطالعه با هدف ارائه مدلی برای مدیریت سبد پروژه های تحقیق و توسعه خدمات سلامت از دیدگاه فناوری اطلاعات صورت گرفته است. روش تحقیق: این مطالعه از حیث هدف، کاربردی و در سه مرحله انجام شده است. در گام اول با بررسی های کتابخانه ای شاخص های عمومی موثر بر مدیریت سبد پروژه های تحقیق و توسعه خدمات سلامت مبتنی بر فناوری اطلاعات، شناسایی شد. در گام بعدی با بهره گیری از روش دلفی ابعاد، مولفه ها و شاخص های اساسی موثر استخراج شدند. درنهایت، به منظور اعتبارسنجی مدل، از طریق پرسشنامه، نظرات متخصصان واحدهای تحقیق و توسعه در حوزه خدمات سلامت گردآوری و با روش مدل معادلات ساختاری مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. یافته ها: مدل نهایی پژوهش در دو سطح خرد و کلان در قالب 15 مولفه با 70 شاخص حاصل شد. مؤلفههای سطح خرد، مدیریت سرمایه مالی و فکری، مدیریت فناوری و تحقیق و توسعه، برنامهریزی استراتژیک ، مدیریت کیفیت، به عنوان عوامل حیاتی ظاهر شده است. در سطح کلان، مؤلفههای سیاسی، فرهنگی، اقتصادی، قانونی، نهادی، فناوری اطلاعات، فناوری اطلاعات سلامت و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی نقشهای محوری دارند. نتیجه گیری: در بین ابعاد شناسایی شده، مدیریت فناوری، مدیریت مالی، مدیریت سرمایه فکری و مدیریت استراتژیک، به ترتیب بیشترین اهمیت را دارا بوده اند.
Introduction: In an era defined by technological advances and the need to improve health care services, the effective management of health research and development collections is of great importance. This study aims to provide a model for managing the portfolio of health service research and development projects from the perspective of information technology. Research method: This study is applied in terms of purpose and has been done in three stages. In the first step, public indicators affecting the portfolio management of health service research and development projects based on information technology were identified through library surveys. In the next step, using the Delphi method, effective dimensions, components and basic indicators were extracted. Finally, in order to validate the model, through a questionnaire, the opinions of experts from research and development units in the field of health services were collected and analyzed with the structural equation model method. Findings: The final model of the research was obtained at both micro and macro levels in the form of 15 components with 70 indicators. Micro-level components, financial and intellectual capital management, technology management and research and development, strategic planning, quality management, have emerged as critical factors. At the macro level, political, cultural, economic, legal, institutional, information technology, health information technology and healthcare services have pivotal roles. Conclusion: Among the identified dimensions, technology management, financial management, intellectual capital management and strategic management have been the most important, respectively
1. Rezayan Q, Kazemi M. Imaging and macro-pictures of the future of world politics. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 2013; 6(3): 173-200. [In Persian].
2. Platje A, Seidel H, Wadman S. Project and portfolio planning cycle —project-based management for the multiproject challenge. International Journal of Project Management 1994; 12 (2): 100–10.
3. Cooper R.G, Edgett S.J, Kleinschmidt E.J. Best Practices for Managing R&D Portfolios[J]. Research-Technology Management 1998; 41(4): 20-33.
4. Blanes V, Möller M. Project selection and execution in teams.The RAND Journal of Economics 2016; 47(1): 166–185.
5. https://www.gartner.com/en/doc/757744-shift-toward-strategic-portfolio-management-to-enable-organizational-agility
6. Wissenburg R, Kusters R, Martin, H. Relationships between IT Project Portfolio risk and IT Project Portfolio health. 2023 IEEE 25th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), Prague, Czech Republic, 2023, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1109/CBI58679.2023.10187481.
7. Mikhailova D. Quality Management System for R&D Project and Portfolio Management in Pharmaceutical Company. In: Schweizer, L., Dingermann, T., Russe, O., Jansen, C. (eds) Advances in Pharma Business Management and Research. Springer, Cham. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35918-8_3
8. Salman A, Fakhraldeen S, Chun A, Jamil K, Gasana J, Al-Hunayan A. Enhancing Research and Development in the Health Sciences as a Strategy to Establish a Knowledge-Based Economy in the State of Kuwait: A Call for Action. Journal of healthcare 2020; 8(2):264
. 9. Baigi M, Helena A. Promoting the creation of R&D intentions in primary healthcar measured by a validated instrument. Journal of Health Research Policy and Systems, 2019, No17, p.107.
10. Alberta Katz R, Salamanca-Buentello F, Silva D.S. R&D during public health emergencies: the value(s) of trust, governance and collaboration. Journal of BMJ Glob Health, 2022, No 7.
11. Pinheiro G, Eduardo, Nunes M, Sérgio M, Affonso P, Sally D, Mary, Morilha Muritiba. Analyzing R&D projects on health products. INMR - Innovation & Management Review 2016; 12(1) 199-210.
12. Mihand M, Al-Sherbaji F, Millet P, Morguay B. WHO research and development plan: 2018 review of emerging infectious diseases requiring urgent research and development efforts", national library of medicine.No.159, PP.63-67, 2018.
13. Mahdavi A, Ebrahimi K, Mehrtak M, Mashoufi M. Drawing a scientific map of the latest developments in health information technology based on WOS articles: 2010-2017. Journal of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences of Mashhad, Vol.9, No. 4, 2013. [In Persian]
14.
Grant J, Pollitt A, Clarke S, Cochrane Gavin S, Horvat V. Support the development of a new health research and development strategy. No.2, P.214, 2014. 15.
Jeng D, Huang K. Strategic project portfolio selec-tion for national research institutes. Journal of Business Research 2015; 68(11):2305–2311. 16. Lacerda F. Modelo de gestão de portfólio de projetos emorganiza¸cões sem fins lucrativos: um estudo exploratório em uma asso-cia¸cão médica de especialidade 2015; Available at https://repositorio.uninove.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/717 (accessed 26.02.16)
. 17. Levin G. Project Portfolio Management in Theory and Practice.2005; 13(2): 978-1-4987-6924-2
. 18. Jalalpour S, Nadi . Research and development of pharmaceutical industries in developing countries studied in India. Rushd Technology Quarterly 2014; 14(2): 40. [In Persian].
19.
David F. Strategic management concepts and cases. Pearson College Div 2022, 13(1). 20. Horváth D, Szabó R. Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2019; (146): 119-132
. 21. Mokgohloa K, Kanakana-Katumba G, Maladzhi R. Xaba S. A Grounded Theory Approach to Digital Transformation in the Postal Sector in Southern Africa. ASTES Journal 2021; 6(2): 313-323.
22. Taqavi Fard M, Jalili M, Seyyed Naghavi M, Raisi Vanani I. Identify and categorize the competencies of senior IT executives in Iran's Health sector. Journal of Information Management 1398; 5(2):1-26. [In Persian]
. 23. Masserat E, Mohammadzadeh Z. The Impact of Modern Health Technologies Educational Program on Knowledge of Health Information Management Staff . Journal of Modern Medical Information 1398; 5(2):51-58. [In Persian]
. 24. Hazrat Esfandiar, Hussam S, Atai J, Jadidi R, Etebar I. Impact of Information Technology on Improving Health from the Viewpoint of Managers of Ardebil University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences Mashhad 1397; 7(1):47-56. [In Persian]
. 25. Taheri B, Haddadpour E, Qadawi R. Analysis of the scientific collaborations of the authors of the articles in the Health Information Management Journal. Journal of Health Information Management 1398;16(1):31-37. [In Persian]
. 26. Aghajanian Shara, Radfar R, Tabaian S, Hosseini S. Presenting a conceptual framework for the management of open innovation project portfolio in information and communication technology companies. Innovation Management Quarterly in Defense Organizations 2019;1: 23-57. [In Persian]
. 27. Hemat Morteza, Ayat Elahi H, Maleki M, Thaghafi F. Reviewing the organizational structure and job positions in the field of health information technology and providing a model for Iran. Pyavard Salamat 2019; 6 (2): 22 -30. [In Persian]
. 28. Masoudi Far P, Moslinejad A, Azizi M. Providing a framework for strategic planning of the project portfolio using thematic analysis method. Industrial Management 1400;4(1): 663-634. [In Persian]
. 29. Sadouqi F, Ebrahimi K. Analysis of health information management and informatics trends in Web of Science 2014. Health Information Management 2014; 5(11): 92-581. [In Persian]
. 30. Asgari A, Tabatabaiyan F, Taqwa S, Abolhasani M, . Development Policies of Information Technology Maturity Model in Community Health Organizations Based on ITIL. Public Policy Scientific Research Quarterly 2016; 3(4): 29-50. [In Persian]
. 31. Katz A, Salamanca-Buentello R, Silva F, Diego S. R&D during public health emergencies: the value(s) of trust, governance and collaboration. Journal of BMJ Glob Health 2022; No 7(2):63-92.
32. Derakhshan S, Delavi M, Dehghan M. Investment portfolio management of case information technology projects (Isfahan University of Medical Sciences). Health Information Management 2014; 12( 2):150-161. [In Persian]
. 33.
Amable B, Palombarini S. Technical change and incorporated R&D in the service sector. Journal of Research Policy 1998; 27(2): 655-675. 34. Hamidi F, Abedi S, Sanai M. Designing a fuzzy artificial intelligence system in the selection of health technology in the foresight process. Future Management Research Quarterly 2019; 128(2):124-132. [In Persian]
. 35.
Ghazvini M, Ghezavati V, Raissi S, Makui A. An Integrated Efficiency–Risk Approach In Sustainable Project Control. Sustainability 2017; 9(9): 1575. [In Persian]. 36.
Relich, M. & Pawlewski, P. A Fuzzy Weighted Average Approach For Selecting Portfolio Of New Product Development Projects. Neurocomputing 2017; 231: 19-27. 37.
Luan R, et al. Cyber threats to health information systems: A systematic review. IOS Press 2016; 24(1): 1-9. 38.
Mackert M, Mabry Flynn A, Champlin S, Donovan EE, Pounders K. Health literacy and health information technology adoption. JMIR 2016; 18(10): 264. 39. Kamlage J-H, Nanz P. Public Participation and Democratic Innovations:Assessing Democratic Institutions and Processes for Deepening and Increased Public Participation in Political Decision-Making. Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS); 2018.
40.
Michels A. Participation in citizens’ summits and public engagement. International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS) 2019; 85(2):211-27. 41. Milevska Kostova N, Chichevalieva S, Ponce NA, van Ginneken E, Winkelmann J. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition 2017;19(3):1-160.
42. Khodayari-Zarnaq R, Kakemam E, Arab-Zozani M, Rasouli J, Sokhanvar M. Participation of Iranian non-governmental organizations in health policy-making; barriers and strategies for development. International Journal of Health Governance. 2020;25(1):46-56.
43.
Aghaii M. Public consultation and opinion polling processes on comparative review regulations and the situation in Iran (Persian).Administrative Law 2018; 5(14):9-30. 44. Carreira V, Machado J, Vasconcelos L. Legal citizen knowledge and public participation on environmental and spatial planning policies: A case study in Portugal. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research2016; 2(7):28-33.
45. Vértesy L. The public participation in the drafting of legislation in Hungary. Central European Public Administration Review(CEPAR) 2016; 14:115-35
. 46.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed., Pearson Education, NJ.
