کرونا و تأثیرات آن بر مفهوم شهروندی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش سیاست نظری
بهرام اخوان کاظمی
1
,
سید جواد صالحی
2
,
حسین محسنی
3
1 - استاد گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیراز، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تهران، ایران
3 - دانش‌آموخته دکتری علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیراز، ایران
کلید واژه: کروناویروس, شهروندی, عضویت, حقوق, تکالیف. ,
چکیده مقاله :
رخداد پاندمی کرونا در اواخر سال 2019 در چین و گسترش آن در عرصه جهانی، به‌مثابه چالشگر بشر و حیات سیاسی و اجتماعی او عمل کرد. سؤال محوری پژوهش این است که پاندمی‌کرونا چه تأثیراتی بر مقوله شهروندی داشته است؟ در پاسخ می‌توان گفت که کرونا ارکان چهارگانه شهروندی را به شدت تحت تأثیر قرار داد و شرایطی را فراهم آورد که ایده ثبات شهروندی را زیر سؤال برد. به تعبیری، در دو رکن عضویت و مشارکت، تأثیرات آن به گونه‌ای بود که نمی‌توان آن را در هیچ‌کدام از دو مدل شهروندی جمهوری‌گرا و لیبرال طبقه‌بندی کرد و از طرف دیگر بار تکالیف و وظایف شهروندان را سنگین کرده و بیش از آنکه بر حق‌ها تأکید شود، بر وظایف و تکالیف شهروندان تکیه می‌شد؛ امری که موجب تقویت الگوی شهروند جمهوری‌گرا شد. روش پژوهش، تبیینی- تحلیلی و روش گردآوری اطلاعات نیز کتابخانه‌ای- اینترنتی است.
COVID-19 and Its Impacts on the
Concept of Citizenship
Bahram Akhavan Kazemi*
Seyyed Javad Salehi**
Hossein Mohseni***
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in late 2019 in China and its subsequent global spread acted as a challenge to humanity and its political and social life. The central research question is: What impacts has the COVID-19 pandemic had on the concept of citizenship? In response, it can be said that COVID-19 severely affected the four pillars of citizenship and created conditions that called the idea of stable citizenship into question. In other words, regarding the two pillars of membership and participation, its effects were such that they cannot be classified within either of the two models of republican or liberal citizenship. On the other hand, it increased the burden of citizens’ duties and obligations, emphasizing responsibilities over rights, which strengthened the model of republican citizenship. The research method is explanatory-analytical, and the data collection method is library-based and internet-based.
Keywords: Coronavirus, citizenship, membership, rights, duties.
Introduction
In the early days of 2020, the world experienced a new pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus. One of the most important concepts affected by the COVID-19 pandemic was citizenship. Therefore, the authors first aim to present an analytical-theoretical framework regarding the concept of citizenship and, using an explanatory-analytical method and library and internet sources, examine how this impact has occurred.
Research Background
In this regard, it can be stated that numerous studies have been conducted, such as Citizenship in Times of Pandemic and The Importance of Citizenship and Competence in COVID-19 Treatment, among others. However, a study specifically addressing the topic of the present article has not yet been conducted. Based on this, the present research can be considered highly innovative in terms of both subject and content.
Theoretical Foundations: Citizenship and Its Four Pillars
In general, despite the many dimensions of citizenship, four main and fundamental pillars can be identified:
Membership: The first element in the discussion of citizenship is membership. In other words, citizenship is the same as membership in the political community. It can be said that the issue of membership lies at the center of the concept of citizenship, and in its specific meaning, it reflects the individual’s participation in society for the purpose of shaping their community.
Rights: Rights are crucial for successfully addressing major governance issues, such as the need for fair resource distribution and maintaining order. The importance of rights lies in granting political agency to individuals and recognizing them as worthy of respect and attention.
Duties: The concept of citizenship contains a paradox; that is, this concept encompasses not only rights but also duties and obligations. Therefore, citizens must assume responsibilities in relation to their citizenship rights.
Participation: The fourth pillar of citizenship is participation. Political participation is central for linking rights and responsibilities.
Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Citizenship
COVID-19 and Citizenship Membership
To combat the spread of the disease, many countries moved away from multilateralism and pursued more protectionist and nationalist policies. The mobilization of state power in response to the spread of COVID-19 led to the exclusion of some individuals and the inclusion of others. Activities that constitute citizenship itself came under pressure due to the pandemic. Furthermore, in all areas affected by the pandemic, civil registration and asylum procedures were disrupted. On the other hand, travel restrictions undoubtedly limited what can be called one of the “markets” of citizenship—that is, markets related to easy citizenship or “birthright citizenship.”
COVID-19 and Citizenship Rights
In the situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic, many civil, political, social, and cultural rights were suspended. For instance, rights such as freedom of movement, access to information, and transparency were significantly undermined. Therefore, it can be said that the pandemic temporarily facilitated a shift from rights to duties, emphasizing obligations over rights. Only rights such as the right to health were strongly prioritized, while other dimensions were somewhat marginalized (though not entirely).
COVID-19 and Citizenship Duties
With the outbreak of COVID-19, a clear increase in citizens’ duties and obligations became evident, particularly as legal obligations. During the pandemic, legal duties generally outweighed moral or ethical responsibilities. Citizens who failed to comply with quarantine measures faced various fines and penalties.
COVID-19 and Citizenship Participation
It can be argued that a pandemic like COVID-19 forces both individuals and governments to prioritize decision-making without citizen participation over decisions based on shared contractual rationality. In other words, since the government’s duty is to maintain security and protect citizens’ health, it cannot wait for public consensus on how to respond to a widespread crisis. Consequently, with the increasing spread of COVID-19 and rising mortality rates worldwide, the rights of citizens in relation to participation in urban or civic politics were effectively set aside.
Conclusion
Given these developments, a central question arises: in light of the pandemic’s effects on the four dimensions of citizenship, which direction has citizenship taken—toward the republican or liberal model? Regarding membership, which is foundational to citizenship, both liberal and republican traditions emphasize it, although they differ in implementation. The pandemic disrupted these mechanisms, placing membership outside the conventional frameworks of both models.
Regarding rights and duties, the liberal model prioritizes individual rights, emphasizing individual autonomy over collective obligations, whereas the republican model prioritizes societal duties over individual rights. The pandemic reinforced the republican emphasis on duties, as citizens’ responsibilities increased.
Finally, participation, a key dimension in both liberal and republican models, was weakened during the pandemic. Given that both models rely on active citizen engagement, participation under COVID-19 cannot be fully classified within either framework. Overall, the pandemic highlighted a shift in citizenship toward the republican model in terms of duties and rights while simultaneously limiting participation in ways not accounted for by traditional models.
References
Abbasi, M., et al. (2020) “The COVID-19 Pandemic: From Human Rights Considerations to Citizenship Obligations”, Medical Law, 14(55), pp.7–22. [In Persian/Farsi]
Akhavan Kazemi, B., & Mohseni, H. (2023) “Analyzing the Negative and Positive Effects of Pandemics on the Political Sphere: With Emphasis on COVID-19”, Strategic Policy Research, 12(44), pp.197–232. [In Persian/Farsi]
Boon Lim, S. (2021) “The Right or Wrong to the City? Understanding Citizen Participation in the Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Eras in Malaysia”, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(238), pp.1–18.
Brown, K., & Wang, R. C. (2020) “Politics and Science: The Case of China and the Coronavirus”, Asian Affairs, 51(2), pp.247–264.
Davis, M., & Lowina, L. (2020) Pandemic, People, and Narrative (E. Yazdanpour, Trans.). Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. [In Persian/Farsi]
Eli Gasht. (2020) “Border Closures Following the Spread of the Coronavirus”. Available at: https://www.eligasht.com/Blog/travelguide/ [In Persian/Farsi]
Finders, M. V. (2020) “Democracy and the Politics of Coronavirus: Trust, Blame and Understanding”, Parliamentary Affairs, 74(2), pp.1–17.
Gharib, M. (2020) “The Pandemic Is Not Good for Freedom and Democracy. But There Are Exceptions”, NPR, November 10. Available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/11/10/930464419/report-th-pandemic-is-not-good-for-freedom-and-democracy-but-there-are-exceptio
Gozdecka, D. A. (2021) “Human Rights During the Pandemic: COVID-19 and Securitisation of Health”, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 39(3), pp.205–223.
Helbling, M., Maxwell, R., Munzert, S., & Traunmüller, R. (2022) “The Importance of Citizenship for Deserving COVID-19 Treatment”, Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), pp.1–8.
Hosseini, S. R. (2020) “The COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis and the Necessity of the Moral Reproduction of Human Freedom in Political Theology”, Contemporary Political Essays, 11(4), pp.97–114. [In Persian/Farsi]
IDEA. (2020) Taking Stock of Global Democratic Trends Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Available at: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/global-democratic-trends-before-and-during-covid-19-pandemic.pdf [December 2020]
ICNL. (2020) U.S. Current Trend: COVID-19 and Civic Freedom, March 2020. Available at: https://www.icnl.org/post/analysis/u-s-current-trend-covid-19-and-civic-freedom
Javid, M. J., & Ebrahimi, M. (2013) “Citizenship Duties in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Journal of Public Law Studies, 2(2), pp.25–46. [In Persian/Farsi]
Kashtelz, S., & Davidson, A. (2003) Migration and Citizenship (F. Taghilu, Trans.). Tehran: Strategic Studies Research Center. [In Persian/Farsi]
Kazempour, L. (2012) The Impact of Globalization on the Concept of Citizenship (Master’s thesis, Supervisor: Dr. H. Ghasemi), Imam Khomeini International University, Faculty of Social Sciences. [In Persian/Farsi]
Kruman, M., & Marback, R. (2022) “Citizenship in Pandemic Times”, Citizenship Studies, 26(8), pp.1027–1031.
Maschiz, B. (2020) COVID-19 and the Clash of Civilizations, Digital Publication. [In Persian/Farsi]
Mercel, W. (2020) “Who Governs in Deep Crises? The Case of Germany”, Democratic Theory, 7(2), pp.1–11.
Mohseni, H. (2020) “Analyzing the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Good Governance: A Global Experience”, Contemporary Political Essays, 11(4), pp.339–359. [In Persian/Farsi]
Moghaddam Heydari, G. (2021) “Pandemic, Quarantine, and Medical Politics”, Philosophy of Science, 11(1), pp.195–209. [In Persian/Farsi]
Mir, S., et al. (2020) “Citizenship Rights and Social Communication Rights during and after COVID-19”, Journal of Journalism and Communications Law, 2(3), pp.115–141. [In Persian/Farsi]
Naderi, N. (2019) A Study of Citizenship Rights Policies in the Governments of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hassan Rouhani (Master’s thesis, Supervisor: Dr. M. A. Tavana), University of Yazd, Faculty of Humanities. [In Persian/Farsi]
Pelleu, R. (1991) Citizen and State (A. Ghazi, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian/Farsi]
Piredda, P. (2022) “The Use of Foucault’s and Schmitt’s Theories and War Metaphors in the Political Narratives of the COVID-19 Pandemic”, Interface, Available at: https://interface.org.tw/index.php/if/article/view/183/542
Safaei, M. M., & Parvaz, F. (2021) “Legal and Ethical Duties of Coronavirus Carriers and Ethical-Legal Considerations in Dealing with Them”, Proceedings of the Conference on Coronavirus in the Mirror of the Qur’an and Legal-Jurisprudential Thoughts, Yasouj University, pp.1–11. [In Persian/Farsi]
Shafi’i Seifabadi, M., & Bagheri Dowlatabadi, A. (2020) “Understanding the Realities and Social Impacts of the COVID-19 Crisis Based on Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory”, Interdisciplinary Human Sciences Studies, 12(2), pp.55–90. [In Persian/Farsi]
Saperstein, E. (2023) Global Citizenship in a COVID-19 World. Available at: https://www.henleyglobal.com/
Shaw, J. (2021) “Citizenship and COVID-19: Syndemic Effects”, German Law Journal, 22, pp.1635–1660.
Sikkink, K. (2020) “Rights and Responsibilities in the Coronavirus Pandemic”, Available at: https://www.openglobalrights.org/
Taylor, S. (2019) The Psychology of Pandemics. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tognotti, E. (2013) “Lessons from the History of Quarantine, from Plague to Influenza A”, Historical Review, 19(2), pp.254–259.
Tavana, M. A. (2009) Global Citizenship in the Era of Globalization: An Intercultural Approach (Doctoral dissertation, Supervisor: Dr. A. H. Beheshti), Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Humanities. [In Persian/Farsi]
Tavana, M., et al. (2008) Global Citizenship (K. Dalfrooz, Trans.). Tehran: Kavir. [In Persian/Farsi]
You, J. (2020) “Lessons from South Korea’s COVID-19 Policy Response”, American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), pp.801–808.
Zizek, S. (2020) COVID-19 Shakes the World (N. Gorgin, Trans.). Tehran: Shabkhiz. [In Persian/Farsi]
* Professor, Department of Political Science, Shiraz University, Iran.
kazemi@shirazu.ac.ir
Professor, Department of Political Science, Shiraz University, Iran.
kazemi@shirazu.ac.ir
** Corresponding author: Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, University of Tehran, Iran.
S.javad.salehi@ut.ac.ir
*** Ph.D Student, Political Science, Shiraz University, Iran.
اخوان کاظمی، بهرام و حسین محسنی (1402) «واکاوی اثرات سلبی و ایجابی پاندمی‌ها بر امر سیاسی؛ با تأکید بر کووید 19»، پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست، دوره دوازدهم، شماره 44، اردیبهشت، صص 197- 232.
ایران¬منش، محمدرضا (1394) مفهوم شهروندی، تهران، نگاه معاصر.
الی‌گشت (1399)، بسته شدن مرزها در پی شیوع ویروس کرونا، قابل بازیابی در https://www. eligasht. com/Blog/travelguide/ پللو، روبر (1370) شهروند و دولت، ترجمه ابوالفضل قاضی، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
توانا، محمدعلی (1388) شهروندی جهانی در عصر جهانی شدن؛ یک رهیافت بینافرهنگی، رساله دکتری علوم سیاسی، استاد راهنما دکتر علیرضا حسینی بهشتی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، دانشکده علوم انسانی.
جاوید، محمدجواد و محمود ابراهیمی (1392) «تکالیف شهروندی در قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، بررسی حقوق عمومی، سال دوم، شماره 2، تابستان، صص 25-46.
حسینی، سید رضا (1399) «بحران همه‌گیری کرونا و ضرورت بازتولید اخلاقی آزادی انسان در الهیات سیاسی»، جستارهای سیاسی معاصر، سال یازدهم، شماره 4، زمستان، صص 97- 114.
دیویس، مارک و لوینا لوهم (1399) پاندمی، مردم و روایت، ترجمه اسماعیل یزدان‌پور، تهران، مؤسسه مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
ژیژک، اسلاوی (1399) پاندمی کرونا دنیا را تکان می¬دهد، ترجمه نوید گرگین، تهران، شب‌خیز.
شفیعی سیف‌آبادی، محسن و علی باقری دولت‌آبادی (1399) «فهم واقعیات و پیامدهای اجتماعی بحران کووید 19 بر مبنای نظریه سیستم‌های اجتماعی نیکلاس لومان»، مطالعات میان¬رشته‌ای علوم انسانی، دوره دوازدهم، شماره 2، بهار، صص 55-90.
صفایی، محمدمحسن و فخر‌الدین پرواز (1400) «وظایف حقوقی و اخلاقی ناقلان ویروس کرونا و ملاحظات حقوقی و اخلاقی در برخورد با ایشان»، همایش کرونا در آیینه قرآن و اندیشه‌های فقهی و حقوقی، دانشگاه یاسوج، بهمن، صص 1-11.
عباسی، محمود و دیگران (1399) «پاندمی کرونا؛ از ملاحظات حقوق بشری تا الزامات شهروندی»، حقوق پزشکی، سال چهاردهم، شماره 55، زمستان، صص 7- 22.
فالکس، کیث (1381) شهروندی، ترجمه محمدتقی دلفروز، تهران، کویر.
فیرحی، داوود و احمد بیگلری (1396) «درآمدی بر تاریخ مفهوم شهروندی؛ از تصوری فضیلت‌مدارانه تا برداشتی حق‌بنیاد»، سپهر سیاست، سال پنجم، شماره 15، صص 102- 75.
کاستلز، استفان و آلیستر دیویدسون (1382) مهاجرت و شهروندی، ترجمه فرامرز تقی‌لو، تهران، پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
کاظم‌پور، لقمان (1391) تأثیر جهانی شدن بر مفهوم شهروندی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی¬ارشد رشته علوم سیاسی، استاد راهنما دکتر حاکم قاسمی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی.
ماس شیز، برونو (1399) کرونا و برخورد تمدن‌ها، مجموعه مقالات کرونا و تمدن، میز تخصصی تمدن اسلامی و گروه تاریخ تمدن اسلامی، نشر به صورت دیجیتال.
محسنی، حسین (1399) «واکاوی تأثیرات پاندمی کرونا بر حکمرانی خوب؛ تجربه‌ای جهانی»، جستارهای سیاسی معاصر، سال یازدهم، شماره 4، زمستان، صص 339- 359.
مقدم حیدری، غلامحسین (1400) «همه¬گیری، قرنطینه و سیاست پزشکی»، فلسفه علم، سال یازدهم، شماره 1، بهار و تابستان، صص 195- 209.
مهدویان‌فر، مسعود (1391) موانع توسعه شهروندی در ایران، از مشروطیت تاکنون، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی¬ارشد رشته علوم سیاسی، استاد راهنما دکتر محمدعلی توانا، دانشگاه یزد، دانشکده علوم انسانی.
میر، صمد و دیگران (1399) «حق شهروندی و حقوق ارتباطات اجتماعی در کرونا و پساکرونا»، حقوق روزنامه‌نگاری و ارتباطات، سال دوم، شماره 3، بهار و تابستان، صص 115- 141.
نادری، نسیم (1398) بررسی برنامه‌ها و سیاست‌های حقوق شهروندی در دولت‌های محمود احمدی‌نژاد و حسن روحانی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی¬ارشد رشته علوم سیاسی، استاد راهنما دکتر محمدعلی توانا، دانشگاه یزد، دانشکده علوم انسانی.
Boon Lim, Seng (2021) The Right or Wrong to the City? Understanding Citizen Participation in the Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Eras in Malaysi, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 7 (238), pp: 1- 18.
Brown, Kerry & Congjiang Wang, Ruby (2020) Politics and Science:The Cace of Chnia and the Crona Virus, Asian Affairs, Vol. LI, no. II, pp:247–264.
Finders, Matthew Vincent (2020) Democracy and the Politics of Coronavirus- Trust, Blame and Understanding, Parliamentary Affairs, 74(2), pp : 1- 17.
Gharib, Malaka (2020) The Pandemic Is Not Good For Freedom And Democracy. But There Are Exceptions, November 10, 2020, https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/11/10/930464419/report-th pandemic-is-not-good-for-freedom-and-democracy-but-there-are-exceptio.
Gozdecka, D. A (2021) Human Rights During the Pandemic: COVID-19 and Securitisation of Health, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 39:3, PP : 205-223.
Helbling, Marc, Maxwell, Rahsaan, Munzert, Simon, Traunmüller, Richard (2022) The importance of citizenship for deserving COVID-19 treatment. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pp: 1-8.
ICNL (2020) U.S. Current Trend: COVID-19 and Civic Freedom, March 2020, https://www.icnl.org/post/analysis/u-s-current-trend-covid-19-and-civic-freedom.
IDEA (2020) Taking Stock of Global Democratic Trends Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic, https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications /global-democratic-trends-before-and-during-covid-19-pandemic.pdf(december 2020).
Kruman. Marc, Marback, Richard (2022) Citizenship in pandemic times, Citizenship Studies, VOL. 26, NO. 8,pp: 1027–1031.
Mercel, Wolfgang (2020) Who Governs in Deep Crises? The Case of Germany. Democratic Theory Volume 7, Issue 2, Winter 2020: 1–11.
Munyede, Paradzai, Machengete, Vongai Praise (2020), Rethinking Citizen Participation and Local Governance Post Corona Virus Pandemic Era in Zimbabve, Transatlantic Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vo2, No 1& 2, pp: 1-16.
Piredda, Patrizia (2022) The Use of Foucault’s and Schmitt’s Theories and War Metaphors in the Political Narratives of the COVID-19 Pandemic, https://interface.org.tw/index.php/if/article/view/183/542.
Saperstein. Enan (2023) Global Citizenship in a Covid-19 World. https://www.henleyglobal.com/.
Shaw. Jo (2021) Citizenship and COVID-19: Syndemic Effects, German Law Journal (2021) 22, pp. 1635–1660.
Sikkink. Kathryn (2020) Rights and responsibilities in the Coronavirus pandemic. In https://www.openglobalrights.org/.
Snowden, Frank M (2019) Epidemics and Society From the Black Death to the Present, Yale University Press.
Taylor, Steven (2019) The Psychology of Pandemics, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tognotti, Eugenia (2013) Lessons from the History of Quarantine, from Plague to Influenza A. Historical Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, February 2013. pp 254- 259.
You, Jongeun (2020) Lessons From South Korea’s Covid-19 Policy Response. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 50 (6-7), pp:801– 808.
